Posted on 12/13/2007 10:58:57 AM PST by traviskicks
This article is just another bunch of slogans and demagoguery. There is NO program to actually DO anything presented by Paul.
What is Paul’s plan of action?
Does he want to get government out of the business of licensing physicians, and requiring medical schools to be accredited?
That is really where the biggest bottleneck is. Not enough physicians because of the licensure and accredidation retrictions.
ping
I asked him, "How can elderly people be taken care of without a big government program like that?"
"Right now, it's difficult," Paul said, "because we made a whole generation who are too dependent. But the question that we ought to ask is, if we continue to do what we do, how are we going to finance it? There's no funding for Medicare. It's under a greater threat than Social Security
Don’t hold your breath waiting for a response to that simple question.
Interesting idea, but easier said than done. If the government pulls the plug on Medicare, I want all of my contributions back, compounded for all the years they have had them. And I want them to make good with my former employer, who adjusted my retirement policies over many years under the assumption that medicare was going to kick in.
I think it’s not too late to pull the plug on Bush’s recent and very stupid medicare prescription plan. Rational employers continue to offer better, less expensive alternatives in their retirement plans, though no doubt some employers have drunk the koolaid. But getting out from under Medicare is another matter entirely.
That’s the problem with socialist interference. Once done, it’s very difficult to undo. You can’t just stamp your foot and declare it out of existence. It’s like Russia after 70 years of Communism. You can’t easily just start over, with a wrecked economy, a surviving Apparat of KGB agents, and a population mostly stupified by vodka. It’s not easy to fix.
I'd rather have no plan rather than the abortion of a boondoggle Bush's Medicare shenanigans turned out to be.
Best way to flummox a Paulbot is to ask them about a plan...
“This article is just another bunch of slogans and demagoguery.”
Much like the majority of your posts......
I don’t understand how conservatives can read this, understand his message, and still post such vile things about him. Dr. Paul IS conservatism.
I’m NOT a fan of Paul’s, but he is right this issue, at least the part of getting Government out of Healthcare where Government should never have been in the first place. I think the transition from Government meddling to Free Market policies is what really needs to be addressed, and then do it.
Get Government out of Healthcare. It’s to Politicians’ a huge pot of gold to play Pol games with.
Ron Paul is to conservatism as Fred Phelps is to the Bible.
Was that vile enough?
Wish I could remember who said that first, I’d like to give credit.
“Young people tend to be more principled...”
Fascinating quote. I think he’s right.
I asked him, “How can elderly people be taken care of without a big government program like that?”
“Right now, it’s difficult,” Paul said, “because we made a whole generation who are too dependent. But the question that we ought to ask is, if we continue to do what we do, how are we going to finance it? There’s no funding for Medicare. It’s under a greater threat than Social Security”
“What is Pauls plan of action?”
As you can see from the above response, he has none. How anyone can possibly think that this maroon is presidential material I will never know. Oh wait, I take that back. There are people who will fall for anything....Scientology, 9/11 conspiracies, alian abductions.....so why not Ron Paul?
That would be a good start. I'd want my payments for care that were elevated due to cost shifting too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.