Posted on 12/11/2007 12:49:00 PM PST by pissant
The anti-Rudy gang are are willing to throw the Republican party under the bus to get their way.
I look at it differently. The GOP rank and file are willing to throw conservatism and Reaganism under the bus to get a supposedley electable candidate.
Self destruction is not pleasant to watch.
“The anti-Rudy gang are are willing to throw the Republican party under the bus to get their way.”
More accurately, Rudy and the blue state, country club Republicans are willing to trash the party in an attempt to elect one of their own. Or, more accurately, an attempt to nominate a liberal, blue state Republican that red states will have to elect in November, 2008.
Enviroracist site.
No requests for pics of Michelle Malkin? Why should Ann Coulter be the exception? This is Bizarre World!
Proof, please.
IT IS official!!
Jim Gilchrist is the new Benedict Arnold!!
Benedict Arnold has become an American expression used to describe traitors and remains widely recognized as such even in 21st century America.
Someone’s got a huge vat of Kool-Aid somewhere. Just unbelievable.
Mendacity! by annoiting another RINO? If that were the case they need to push Tancredo and Hunter to the front. WE ARE THE BASE I am sick of some of you conservatives saying, aww hunter/tancredo cant win, I will throw money at the best looking rino that msmbccnnfox says will win. I would love for there to be Hunter/Tancredo administration. maybe we prove the pollsters wrong.
Why isn’t this denounced as a Huck-a-flop?
And then there is this:
Roy Beck of Numbers USA on Fred’s immigration plan:
When Fred Thompson came out with a detailed immigration policy this fall, I knew it was very good but was too busy leading the fight against amnesties in the Senate to give thorough attention.
Reading Thompsons full proposed immigration policy this afternoon, I am blown away by its depth, its breadth and at how it would so fundamentally change Americans future for the better.
It’s true that Numbers USA has been critical of Thompson in the past (mostly over LEGAL immigration issues, as they want a reduction in immigration overall), however Mr. Beck went further in his analysis:
As a Senator from Tennessee in the 1990s, Thompson had a mixed record on immigration. I’ve studied that record and believe it reflects the problem that we saw even in some of this year’s Senate heroes who also were mediocre in the 1990s — most of them just weren’t paying much attention to this issue in the 1990s (just like a lot of you have only become active on this during the last couple of years).
NumbersUSA always gives ample credit to politicians who turn from bad or mediocre records and decide to become our champions. But less-than-stellar past records require us to look for signs of sincerity and assurance that they will follow through on their promises.
With Thompson, we will be watching closely for these signs. One strong point for him is that he finished his Senate career with an A-minus performance in 01/02 term after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. And since coming out with his official stance, he has not been equivocating when asked about immigration in media appearances or in strong immigration ads.
It is. This guy is a disaster.
What’s next? Tancredo drops out and endorses the huckster?
Nothing would surprise me now.
The NRO staff were right on immigration too but they are picking Romney....ahh the “establishment wing” of the party has made their choice.
He’s dead. Jim.
Well, we will certainly find out. The Huckster seems to have the wind at his back these days.
Dang. You missed the joke...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.