Skip to comments.
Mitt Romney Versus The Evangelicals
The National Ledger ^
| 10/10/07
| Chris Davis
Posted on 12/10/2007 5:10:30 PM PST by writer33
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: writer33
Was beginning to wonder if you were doing a critical analysis until I got to the snakes. :)
21
posted on
12/10/2007 5:36:32 PM PST
by
SouthTexas
(Have a Merry and Blessed Christmas.)
To: Brilliant
The Evangelicals have got to lose to Hillary before they will become reasonable. Voting for someone because he’s a Christian is nonsense.Why?
To: txzman
Glad you enjoyed it, txzman. Thanks for reading. I appreciate it.
23
posted on
12/10/2007 5:36:59 PM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservatie and Rush Limbaugh knows it.)
To: Tears of a Clown
The evangelicals will win, mittie.
24
posted on
12/10/2007 5:37:25 PM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: cricket
That said; Mitt is surely the best candidate. . .just don't know that he is the 'winning candidate'. He needs just a 'little 'Fred' in him. . .
Thanks for reading. Glad you enjoyed it. And I agree with you.
25
posted on
12/10/2007 5:38:41 PM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservatie and Rush Limbaugh knows it.)
To: SouthTexas
Yeah, usually I make it obvious so there’s no confusion.
26
posted on
12/10/2007 5:39:32 PM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservatie and Rush Limbaugh knows it.)
To: SouthTexas
It took you that long? LOL
27
posted on
12/10/2007 5:39:44 PM PST
by
NYTexan
To: Brilliant
Voting for someone because he’s a Christian is nonsense. NOT voting for someone because they wear mystical magical Mormon underpants is simple self interest.
28
posted on
12/10/2007 5:39:48 PM PST
by
humblegunner
(My KungFu is ten times power.©)
To: Salvation
29
posted on
12/10/2007 5:40:56 PM PST
by
redgirlinabluestate
(STOP Huck & Rudy -- Unite 4 Mitt -- Beat Hillary)
To: humblegunner
Really? How have I harmed you? How do you anticipate I may harm you?
30
posted on
12/10/2007 5:42:07 PM PST
by
Old Mountain man
(Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice!)
To: writer33
Satires are usually over the top... Sorry. I did not mean the piece was over the top. I meant this whole controversy is over the top.
31
posted on
12/10/2007 5:42:47 PM PST
by
Route66
(America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
To: writer33; NYTexan
Well, I was just perusing the Texas Secession papers last night and I don’t think any of us are opposed to showing the rats what an actual “civil war” is.....
32
posted on
12/10/2007 5:42:58 PM PST
by
SouthTexas
(Have a Merry and Blessed Christmas.)
To: writer33
Chris you had me LOL!! Thanks.
They do intrude and many times at the dinner hour, however.
33
posted on
12/10/2007 5:43:27 PM PST
by
gidget7
( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
To: Route66
You’re absolutely right. That whole thing is ridiculous.
34
posted on
12/10/2007 5:43:29 PM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservatie and Rush Limbaugh knows it.)
To: humblegunner
Gunner, ya need ta provide a link for that obscure reference!
35
posted on
12/10/2007 5:43:48 PM PST
by
NYTexan
To: SouthTexas
36
posted on
12/10/2007 5:45:23 PM PST
by
writer33
(The U.S. Constitution defines a conservatie and Rush Limbaugh knows it.)
To: writer33
Satirical, yes, but Mormons are NOT Christians. They believe that works can get one into heaven. They also believe that God came to earth in the form of a man and had sex with Mary to impregnate her. And those are just a couple of points.
37
posted on
12/10/2007 5:45:26 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Old Mountain man
How do you anticipate I may harm you? You are not running for president, different scenario.
Romney, in his much touted speech, said his church will not dictate his decisions as president.
Well, that's a lie. They dictate what kind of underpants he
wears, and will continue to do so should he become president.
If he will allow his church to make him wear special underpants, what else might they require of him in office?
Scary thought.
38
posted on
12/10/2007 5:47:16 PM PST
by
humblegunner
(My KungFu is ten times power.©)
To: writer33
I can’t choose between Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee ..because they are both bad choices
39
posted on
12/10/2007 5:48:51 PM PST
by
WalterSkinner
( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
To: NYTexan
Gunner, ya need ta provide a link for that obscure reference! Dang it, I'm at my daily word limit on that topic.
I'll post 'er tomorrow!
40
posted on
12/10/2007 5:50:25 PM PST
by
humblegunner
(My KungFu is ten times power.©)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson