Who would have guessed Robert Reich has a blog?
1 posted on
12/04/2007 5:56:38 AM PST by
jdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: jdm
It’s a short blog.
Hillary needs convictions........and sentencing..........
2 posted on
12/04/2007 5:57:30 AM PST by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: jdm
"between someone who talks the talk, and somebody who's walked the walk." Avoid clichés like the plague.
5 posted on
12/04/2007 5:59:25 AM PST by
HIDEK6
To: jdm
shock, shock the commie dwarf backs obama
7 posted on
12/04/2007 6:00:43 AM PST by
sticker
To: jdm
![](http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20071121/capt.00b8a9c369404c919344d2974e351282.clinton_2008_ianh103.jpg?x=287&y=345&sig=HThYeZKCE3AQYCc1pTJKlQ--)
He's just a not nice man, like his freind Obama; they do not play nice in the playground and now their hitting on me, a woman. They were not nice men then, and they are bad men now. Democrats have to vote for me, I'm entitled to it"
/Sarcasm OFF
8 posted on
12/04/2007 6:03:38 AM PST by
sr4402
To: jdm
One socialist criticizing another socialist....what a RIOT!!
10 posted on
12/04/2007 6:05:14 AM PST by
Ann Archy
(Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: jdm
Robert Reich: [Hillary] Clinton lacks 'conviction about anything'Define irony.....
Robert Reich belittling someone.
11 posted on
12/04/2007 6:05:31 AM PST by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
To: jdm
Interesting; Hitlary has had a bad two weeks and it seems to be getting worse and frankly, though I despise the Clintons, it somewhat surprises me; I’d have thought the MSM would have given her a free pass.
Strange, very strange; I guess that one can only sweep so much under the rug before it starts to ooze out continuosly.
12 posted on
12/04/2007 6:07:18 AM PST by
glide625
To: jdm
Lacks conviction but should be convicted.
13 posted on
12/04/2007 6:07:45 AM PST by
Hacklehead
(Pretending to be a civilized man.)
To: jdm
and now teaches public policy at the University of California-Berkeley.WTF?
I had no idea they paid people to do something like this. Isn't "public policy" one of those made-up things like "social work?"
15 posted on
12/04/2007 6:09:15 AM PST by
HIDEK6
To: jdm
He left the Clinton administration in 1997 and now teaches public policy at the University of California-Berkeley. And also represents the Lollipop Guild.
17 posted on
12/04/2007 6:09:54 AM PST by
Sloth
(Democrats and GOPers are to government what Jeffrey Dahmer and Michael Jackson are to babysitting)
To: jdm
A former Clinton acolyte who has the nerve to state that the Empress has no clothes. Coming from Reich, it’s a small wonder.....
18 posted on
12/04/2007 6:11:53 AM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: jdm
Kinda shocking to hear this from a former Clinton hack. Reich is an unrepentant leftist, but for all his faults he’s never tried to hide that.
22 posted on
12/04/2007 6:27:51 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
(I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
To: jdm
This is good news. It means we get to hear Rush talk about Robert Reishshshshshshshshshshshshshsch some more.
23 posted on
12/04/2007 6:28:50 AM PST by
advance_copy
(Stand for life or nothing at all)
To: jdm
Its nice to see Reich stand tall on an issue.
25 posted on
12/04/2007 6:31:53 AM PST by
poinq
To: jdm
Robert RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRReich-a said this? WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
28 posted on
12/04/2007 6:33:22 AM PST by
GOP_Lady
To: jdm
Hey Hillary. Put some ice on that.
38 posted on
12/04/2007 7:12:05 AM PST by
manic4organic
(Send a care package through USO today.)
To: jdm
Time to start collecting quotes for the 2008 campaign.
41 posted on
12/04/2007 7:23:31 AM PST by
popdonnelly
(Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
To: jdm
RUSH: ...The Clintons are famous for dirty campaigns and negative campaigns, but here's the thing, folks. If Barack Obama... Look at what he's just been accused of? He's just been accused of running a slush fund, from the Clintons, by Howard Wolfson! Slush fund? Try multiple slush funds: the legal defense fund, the illegal Chinese campaign contributions back in the nineties, the Chinatown contributions this year, Norman Hsu, and the Clintons call Obama and his PAC a slush fund? I'll tell you if Barack Obama has the onions here, folks, he would stomp Mrs. Clinton on this. She is the last person in the country running a campaign to talk about ethics and money in the same sentence. If he's serious about this, if he and his camp are really serious, they're going to say more than just, "Well, look at this. They're running a negative campaign." They are going to have to turn this around on her and on her husband, and say that this is the height of chutzpah, to be accused of running a slush fund by people who have created it as a work of art and who continue to do so to this day. Campaign slush fund! He's got a golden opportunity here, folks, but it does mean that Mrs. Clinton is in somewhat of a state of panic. A lot of people think that they're a week ahead of everybody in terms of polling data and understanding what's happening, and a lot of people think that she's panicking and coming out with the claws bared at Obama and others because they've got some internal numbers that show her crashing in Iowa and maybe in some other states. It could explain it.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I don't know how much it matters, but it's just been pointed out to me that Robert B. Reichhhh on his blog, and I just read it, is all upset at Mrs. Clinton for her attacks on Barack Obama. He doesn't understand it. He doesn't understand why she's stooping so low to challenge his courage, why she is stooping so low to challenge his health care plan, and other things. This is beneath what Democrats stand for, he says. It's alternative universe time. Anyway, I guess the bottom line of it is, is that there are some people out there in Drive-By Media circles, the Democrat Party, asking, "What is this?" They don't understand why Mrs. Clinton's turning on him. This is who she is, Mr. Reichhhh! I can't believe that all you Democrats have no clue who she really is. Obviously, you do. I think these are just warnings to her to pull back. Because they know exactly who she is and they know exactly how destructive it's going to be if she doesn't get a handle on this. You can say what you want about Obama, but he's not an unlikable guy. She is unlikable. But he's not. You know, he's running around. He's seems a nice, soft-spoken kind of guy, seems deep. He seems to care, has all the requisite requirements for a Democrat résumé. He cares, number one at the top. He's not mean. He hasn't been out there attacking anybody, hasn't done anything like that, and so Mrs. Clinton, to turn on him like this, it's like I'm telling you:
There are people that think that their internal polling shows that her support is just crashing, and I'm guessing beyond Iowa. But don't think that they think they can lose Iowa and handle this, because they've pumped this candidacy of inevitability.
Show Us Some Onions, Obama...Respond to Mrs. Clinton's ridiculous hypocritical attacks.
49 posted on
12/04/2007 8:28:24 AM PST by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: jdm
![](http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/misc/nytlogo153x23.gif)
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Clinton lacks ‘conviction about anything’ Former President Bill Clinton’s name does not appear on the cover, but there is no mistaking the target of the 237-page final report released today by the independent counsel Robert W. Ray, the successor to Kenneth W. Starr. The report is intended to remind the public that prosecutors had ample evidence to file criminal charges against Mr. Clinton, if he had not struck a deal on his last full day in office in January 2001.
Just four years ago, Mr. Clinton’s affair with Ms. Lewinsky, then a 21-year-old White House intern, transfixed the nation. It was only three years ago that Mr. Clinton became the second American president to be impeached by the House, only to be spared removal after a wrenching trial in the Senate....
The report, mandated by law and released by a three-judge panel here, closes the final chapter on the Clinton/Lewinsky matter. One of Mr. Ray’s supporters said today that the report was a historical document that would remind Americans of a recent era when ‘’the Constitution was threatened.’’...
Democrats dismissed the Ray report today as a rehash of some of the most salacious aspects of the Lewinsky story. On Jan. 19, 2001, Mr. Clinton agreed to a settlement in which he avoided the possibility of indictment in exchange for admitting that he gave false testimony under oath. He also agreed to surrender his law license for five years....
Some Clinton associates wondered if there was a partisan motive behind the timing of the report’s release. Mr. Ray has told Republican leaders in New Jersey that he may run as a Republican there; he has until April 8 to file a petition for his candidacy....
John Podesta, the last chief of staff at the Clinton White House, said Mr. Clinton had assumed that he had put those charges behind him in his 2001 deal with Mr. Ray. ‘’He thought it was over,’’ Mr. Podesta said, ‘’but it’s not over.’’
The Democrats complained that Mr. Ray’s report resembled a prosecutor’s closing argument, with no opportunity given to Mr. Clinton’s lawyers to respond.
Source: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C01E2D61230F934A35750C0A9649C8B63&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/J/Jones,%20Paula%20Corbin
.
50 posted on
12/04/2007 8:35:43 AM PST by
OESY
To: jdm
Yea, well when she wins the nomination he’ll come crawling back on his hands and knees begging for forgiveness.
54 posted on
12/04/2007 7:07:19 PM PST by
kempo
(I)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson