1.Concerned Undecided Gay Military Retiree Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr = Hillary/Kerry supporter and anti-Dont Ask, Dont Tell activist Keith H. Kerr
2.Concerned Undecided Mom LeeAnn Anderson = Activist for the John Edwards-endorsing United Steelworkers union LeeAnn Anderson
3.Concerned Undecided Log Cabin Republican supporter David Cercone = Obama supporter David Cercone
4.Concerned Young Undecided Person Journey = John Edwards supporter Journey
1 posted on
11/29/2007 2:16:28 AM PST by
rawhide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: rawhide
2 posted on
11/29/2007 2:36:10 AM PST by
GOP Poet
To: rawhide
What does Glenn Beck have to say about Corrupt News Network?? He must be so proud.
Pray for W and Our Troops
3 posted on
11/29/2007 2:40:02 AM PST by
bray
(Let's Bring Christ Back to Christmas)
To: rawhide
Can you just imagine the outrage, and senate hearings, if a Hunter, or Tancredo supporter actually got to axe the Dums a question?
Their heads would explode!
4 posted on
11/29/2007 2:48:42 AM PST by
rawcatslyentist
(I'd rather be carrying a shotgun with Dick, than riding shotgun with a Kennedyl! *-0(:~{>)
To: rawhide
Obviously CNN is biased or is so incompetent, they do not take time to check on the people who submit questions.
What a farce.
To: rawhide
I’m concerned about general happy feet being deliberately allowed to ask this question. There was no excuse for them not to know and offer full disclosure. And it was PURE HUBRIS for the hillary campaign to assume they’d get away with it.
All the other folks it could be said that the number of questions from democrap supporters is roughly proportionate to the youtube demographic.
But ultimately it will come down to:
OH HOW CLEVER OF HILLARY TO HAVE PLANTED A QUESTION AT THE GOP DEBATE!
9 posted on
11/29/2007 3:00:13 AM PST by
Samurai_Jack
(ride out and confront the evil!)
To: rawhide
I am sure CNN is cooperating with the Clinton campaign on these plants. After that first Democrat debate that showed up Mrs. Bill so badly, there will be NO more debates that are not under the control of the Clintons. The Republicans will go into the presidential debates knowing that they are loaded for Clinton because if they refuse to participate in these Clinton lovefests then MSM will stage empty chair debates and accuse the Republicans of being afraid to debate the invincible Mrs. Clinton. Blitzer showed us how it will go.
12 posted on
11/29/2007 3:11:56 AM PST by
ThanhPhero
(di hanh huong den La Vang)
To: rawhide
You forgot “selected from among 5000 youtube” submissions. Yeah, they just happened to choose them. The weirdest was the “every word in this book” guy. I only had audio and that guy was decidedly creepy/high/drunk sounding. I don’t believe for a second that guy is a Bible-believing Christian.
18 posted on
11/29/2007 3:17:40 AM PST by
visualops
(artlife.us)
To: TheStickman
19 posted on
11/29/2007 3:18:36 AM PST by
visualops
(artlife.us)
To: rawhide
The first rule of the left is “win by any means necessary”. They don’t live by the same set of rules as normal people. They have no principles, no morals, no ethics.
This campaign will get even dirtier because the left is close to getting a real communist in the White House.
To: rawhide
This has to be a double reverse negative inversion psychological ploy by the libs. No one can possibly this stupidly ham handed if trying to effect the outcome of the debates was the end game.
To: rawhide
29 posted on
11/29/2007 3:43:57 AM PST by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: rawhide
We may be up to SIX. A poster at Michelle's blog found that the 'corn subsidies' guy had been an intern to dimocRAT Jane Harman and the 'aspiring TV writer' who asked about Republicans attracting the black vote appears to be a John Edwards supporter.
Corn subsidies guy
Aspiring TV writer
30 posted on
11/29/2007 3:45:19 AM PST by
Bob
To: rawhide
do I really have to say it???
33 posted on
11/29/2007 3:52:33 AM PST by
Chode
(American Hedonist)
To: rawhide
The CNN-Dem debate revealed the network’s desired end state: elect Hillary. The CNN-Rep debate revealed that the network will employ any means to make it happen.
Is it possible that CNN’s arrogance is so repulsive to the citizenry that this event will forever tarnish the network’s reputation? Or has this nation come to accept that the ends justify the means?
38 posted on
11/29/2007 3:57:40 AM PST by
mj81
To: rawhide
Ok, the Libs have had their shot, now lets get a real debate going. I nominate Rush as the moderator and a question set created by the candidates themselves. One question from each. Reworded by Rush’s staff to be neutral questions.
To: rawhide
This story should make cynics of us all.
42 posted on
11/29/2007 4:05:12 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: rawhide
43 posted on
11/29/2007 4:06:23 AM PST by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: rawhide
47 posted on
11/29/2007 4:13:46 AM PST by
DaveTesla
(You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
To: rawhide
GOP candidate can simply REFUSE to be interviewed on CNN by anybody. No debates, no statements. Forever !
Let the Clinton News Network twist in the wind.
49 posted on
11/29/2007 4:14:02 AM PST by
ex-Texan
(Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
To: rawhide
Hillary! at cnn/youtube debate.
51 posted on
11/29/2007 4:16:30 AM PST by
InvisibleChurch
(Tempus Fidget - The time between the final hymn and recessional.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson