Skip to comments.
ON DEADLINE: "Good Bill" vs "Bad Bill"
Yahoo!News ^
| November 27, 2007
| Ron Fournier
Posted on 11/28/2007 4:54:49 PM PST by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
11/28/2007 4:54:55 PM PST
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Bill Clinton when campaigning for anyone but himself is the Kiss of Death. His record since 2000, except for a very few instances, is rotten. How appropriate that he may indeed be the Downfall of Hillary out campaigning for her.
To: Kaslin
Enough said !!!
3
posted on
11/28/2007 5:01:44 PM PST
by
xtinct
(I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
To: Kaslin
There’s gotta be a useful place in society for this guy. Hope he finds it someday.
4
posted on
11/28/2007 5:03:45 PM PST
by
Dagnabitt
(Freedom for ourselves, and for our sons - And failing freedom, war -- Kipling)
To: Kaslin
I still resent that I was not asked or given the opportunity to support those soldiers," he said. Funny how Clintigula thinks the only way that he and others can "support those soldiers" is thru confiscatory tax policy. Says alot, doesnt it?
Also - to state the obvious - if he would like to "support those soldiers" he can write a check to the USO or the many other military support organizations that support our troops. Especially at this time of year.
5
posted on
11/28/2007 5:04:08 PM PST
by
capydick
(Suit Up. Enter the Arena. Play the Game. Play Your Sport)
To: Kaslin
6
posted on
11/28/2007 5:10:04 PM PST
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: Kaslin
RUSH: There's another theory here is that I have evolved to explain Bill Clinton and his rampant lying. By the way, there is a distinction. In the nineties, when Clinton was out there telling whopper after whopper, the press just covered. They covered for him. In fact, they sat back and they did stories; they marveled at what a great liar he was. But now they're calling him on this, all the Drive-Bys. I mean, he's got some circling the wagons. You've got TIME Magazine. You've got ABC. Everybody is calling him on this. AP's Ron Fournier ripped him to shreds today in the "'Good Bill' vs. 'Bad Bill'" story. So that's different. That's going to come as a surprise. The Clintons are used to getting a pass on this kind of stuff from their buds in the Drive-Bys. But it also could be nothing more complicated than this: Maybe he's just panicked. If Hillary's defeated, he is defeated. If Hillary is defeated, his chance of getting back in the White House is fini. So he's out there stumping around doing all these things. Now, when you're in a panic state, you sometimes say impolitic things. But now that he's saying this twice in one day; it does appear to be calculated. (interruption) What, program observer? (interruption) Yes. (interruption) Mmm-hmm. A question is being asked: "Why would he want to go back to the White House?"
Snerdley says, "You know this guy better than himself. Why would he want to go back to the White House?" If he wants to go back White House, it's power, baby. It's power. He's a sixties generation anti-war guy. This is their last chance to remake the country. You can't remake the country in the image you want it to be making speeches in Abu Dhabi. You can't do that. He's got a lot of money now so he doesn't care about that. He doesn't care about popularity. He cares about popularity, but he thinks he's going to be more popular than ever if he gets back in the White House. That's ultimate power. That's what these people are about. I'm stunned, Mr. Snerdley, that you, of all people, don't understand the lure of power and what these people want to do with it. Besides, he won't actually have to be in the White House, which is a bonus. He will have power as though he's in the White House, but he will be all over the world. Hillary will make sure of that. You see if she loses, none of this happens, and he's just a former president without a future that involves the presidency or his wife having a future. Look, it's just a theory. It's just a theory to explain all this. Another theory is, he doesn't want to go to the White House; has no desire for any of this, he's happy catting around right now and the sooner Hillary loses and gets out of this race -- the more he can date, the more he can do, whatever, I don't know -- and is trying to sabotage her.
Clinton: Pathology or Sabotage?
7
posted on
11/28/2007 5:15:35 PM PST
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: capydick
"I still resent that I was not asked or given the opportunity to support those soldiers," he said. What the heck did Bubba mean by that? I just can't figure out what he's referring to. Did someone muzzle him?
To: Kaslin
I’d love to see a televised panel of psychiatrists analyze the both of them. They are both off their nuts.
To: Aristotelian
It’s a bizarre comment, isnt it? The only thing I take away from it is he really thinks that the only way he can “support those soldiers” is thru higher taxes on his income. This comment provides a wider view into his belief that anything and everything begins and ends with government involvement.
10
posted on
11/28/2007 5:24:43 PM PST
by
capydick
(Suit Up. Enter the Arena. Play the Game. Play Your Sport)
To: Kaslin
“50-minute address”
Dang. Bubba talking about himself for 50 minutes is too much to take.
To: Kaslin
[He told the crowd where he bought coffee that morning and where he ate breakfast. . .detailed his Thanksgiving Day guest list, and menu.]
When Clinton’s oversize, unreadable memoirs appeared in stores—invariably discounted—I hefted one up and turned to the index. An acquaintance of mine was one of the top Clinton/Gore fund raisers for years and a visible party activist in the region of the country where I live. The guy’s name wasn’t in the book.
12
posted on
11/28/2007 5:45:00 PM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: Miss Didi
Hillary doesn’t CACKLE anymore and she doesn’t SHRIEK anymore either.....maybe after this, Bill won’t mention himself anymore......yeah right!!
13
posted on
11/28/2007 5:48:59 PM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: All
14
posted on
11/28/2007 5:49:57 PM PST
by
IPWGOP
(I'm Linda Eddy... I'm the cartoonist for iowapresidentialwatch.com)
To: capydick
When ever someone tells me they “don’t need Bush’s stinking tax cut” I always ask them if they are taking their mortgage deduction.
If they say yes, I ask them why. Also, I suggest they break out their check book and return the money to the treasury. Strange, none of them ever do.
15
posted on
11/28/2007 6:01:56 PM PST
by
Holicheese
(1-21-09 Hillary starts to destroy America!)
To: Kaslin
I wanna talk about me
Wanna talk about I
Wanna talk about number one
Oh my me my
What I think, what I like, what I know, what I want, what I see
Hillary Who?
16
posted on
11/28/2007 6:07:55 PM PST
by
Samwise
(Fred doesn't suffer fools or the media. Did I repeat myself?)
To: katieanna
5 minutes, no make that 5 seconds would be to much
17
posted on
11/28/2007 6:19:51 PM PST
by
Kaslin
(Peace is the aftermath of victory)
To: Miss Didi
I was listening to Rush during this segment
18
posted on
11/28/2007 6:29:09 PM PST
by
Kaslin
(Peace is the aftermath of victory)
To: Aristotelian
What the heck did Bubba mean by that? I just can't figure out what he's referring to. Did someone muzzle him? Did nobody tell him he could overpay his taxes? Or send a check to the USO? Or to any of the charities that are involved with supporting the troops.
19
posted on
11/28/2007 6:37:17 PM PST
by
okie01
To: okie01
Wasn’t it because of the Clinton defense spending cutbacks that our troops didn’t have enough body armor and reinforced vehicles? Didn’t Clinton spend the “peace dividend” (after the end of the Cold War) and neglect the military? Didn’t he reduce the size of our forces, so that we became stretched thin with our involvement in Iraq?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson