1 posted on
11/28/2007 4:54:55 PM PST by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Bill Clinton when campaigning for anyone but himself is the Kiss of Death. His record since 2000, except for a very few instances, is rotten. How appropriate that he may indeed be the Downfall of Hillary out campaigning for her.
To: Kaslin
Enough said !!!
3 posted on
11/28/2007 5:01:44 PM PST by
xtinct
(I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
To: Kaslin
There’s gotta be a useful place in society for this guy. Hope he finds it someday.
4 posted on
11/28/2007 5:03:45 PM PST by
Dagnabitt
(Freedom for ourselves, and for our sons - And failing freedom, war -- Kipling)
To: Kaslin
I still resent that I was not asked or given the opportunity to support those soldiers," he said. Funny how Clintigula thinks the only way that he and others can "support those soldiers" is thru confiscatory tax policy. Says alot, doesnt it?
Also - to state the obvious - if he would like to "support those soldiers" he can write a check to the USO or the many other military support organizations that support our troops. Especially at this time of year.
5 posted on
11/28/2007 5:04:08 PM PST by
capydick
(Suit Up. Enter the Arena. Play the Game. Play Your Sport)
To: Kaslin
6 posted on
11/28/2007 5:10:04 PM PST by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: Kaslin
RUSH: There's another theory here is that I have evolved to explain Bill Clinton and his rampant lying. By the way, there is a distinction. In the nineties, when Clinton was out there telling whopper after whopper, the press just covered. They covered for him. In fact, they sat back and they did stories; they marveled at what a great liar he was. But now they're calling him on this, all the Drive-Bys. I mean, he's got some circling the wagons. You've got TIME Magazine. You've got ABC. Everybody is calling him on this. AP's Ron Fournier ripped him to shreds today in the "'Good Bill' vs. 'Bad Bill'" story. So that's different. That's going to come as a surprise. The Clintons are used to getting a pass on this kind of stuff from their buds in the Drive-Bys. But it also could be nothing more complicated than this: Maybe he's just panicked. If Hillary's defeated, he is defeated. If Hillary is defeated, his chance of getting back in the White House is fini. So he's out there stumping around doing all these things. Now, when you're in a panic state, you sometimes say impolitic things. But now that he's saying this twice in one day; it does appear to be calculated. (interruption) What, program observer? (interruption) Yes. (interruption) Mmm-hmm. A question is being asked: "Why would he want to go back to the White House?"
Snerdley says, "You know this guy better than himself. Why would he want to go back to the White House?" If he wants to go back White House, it's power, baby. It's power. He's a sixties generation anti-war guy. This is their last chance to remake the country. You can't remake the country in the image you want it to be making speeches in Abu Dhabi. You can't do that. He's got a lot of money now so he doesn't care about that. He doesn't care about popularity. He cares about popularity, but he thinks he's going to be more popular than ever if he gets back in the White House. That's ultimate power. That's what these people are about. I'm stunned, Mr. Snerdley, that you, of all people, don't understand the lure of power and what these people want to do with it. Besides, he won't actually have to be in the White House, which is a bonus. He will have power as though he's in the White House, but he will be all over the world. Hillary will make sure of that. You see if she loses, none of this happens, and he's just a former president without a future that involves the presidency or his wife having a future. Look, it's just a theory. It's just a theory to explain all this. Another theory is, he doesn't want to go to the White House; has no desire for any of this, he's happy catting around right now and the sooner Hillary loses and gets out of this race -- the more he can date, the more he can do, whatever, I don't know -- and is trying to sabotage her.
Clinton: Pathology or Sabotage?
7 posted on
11/28/2007 5:15:35 PM PST by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: Kaslin
I’d love to see a televised panel of psychiatrists analyze the both of them. They are both off their nuts.
To: Kaslin
“50-minute address”
Dang. Bubba talking about himself for 50 minutes is too much to take.
To: Kaslin
[He told the crowd where he bought coffee that morning and where he ate breakfast. . .detailed his Thanksgiving Day guest list, and menu.]
When Clinton’s oversize, unreadable memoirs appeared in stores—invariably discounted—I hefted one up and turned to the index. An acquaintance of mine was one of the top Clinton/Gore fund raisers for years and a visible party activist in the region of the country where I live. The guy’s name wasn’t in the book.
12 posted on
11/28/2007 5:45:00 PM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: All
14 posted on
11/28/2007 5:49:57 PM PST by
IPWGOP
(I'm Linda Eddy... I'm the cartoonist for iowapresidentialwatch.com)
To: Kaslin
I wanna talk about me
Wanna talk about I
Wanna talk about number one
Oh my me my
What I think, what I like, what I know, what I want, what I see
Hillary Who?
16 posted on
11/28/2007 6:07:55 PM PST by
Samwise
(Fred doesn't suffer fools or the media. Did I repeat myself?)
To: Kaslin
His sociopath ways are worse than ever.
23 posted on
11/28/2007 6:47:51 PM PST by
pray4liberty
(Watch and pray.)
To: Kaslin
In the next 10 minutes, he used the word "I" a total of 94 times and mentioned "Hillary" just seven times in an address that was as much about his legacy as it was about his wife's candidacy. LOL! So who's really running?
29 posted on
11/29/2007 5:21:36 AM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Kaslin
Late in his 50-minute address, Clinton told the crowd that wealthy people like he and his wife should pay more taxes in times of war. "Even though I approved of Afghanistan and opposed Iraq from the beginning, I still resent that I was not asked or given the opportunity to support those soldiers," he said. WTFO? There are any number of ways he can support the troops! He can also send in all the tax money he wants - no one is stopping him!
I am so sick of this charlatan and grifter and his sanctimonious pap! Will he just STFU?
30 posted on
11/29/2007 5:24:34 AM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Kaslin
She has the best policy plans; Unfortunately she can't disclose them till afteer the election!
She works well with Republicans;
Maybe with some RINOs. But truthfully I don't believe she works well with anyone!
She's a problem solver;
One example please? Oh yes, the White House Travel Office Staff - is that how she solves problems? Or Vince Foster?
And she has the best range of experience.
Ha! What range of experience?
31 posted on
11/29/2007 5:30:21 AM PST by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
32 posted on
11/29/2007 10:08:39 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Tuesday, November 27, 2007___________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson