Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01
Wasn’t it because of the Clinton defense spending cutbacks that our troops didn’t have enough body armor and reinforced vehicles? Didn’t Clinton spend the “peace dividend” (after the end of the Cold War) and neglect the military? Didn’t he reduce the size of our forces, so that we became stretched thin with our involvement in Iraq?
20 posted on 11/28/2007 6:41:55 PM PST by Aristotelian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Aristotelian
...because of the Clinton defense spending cutbacks that our troops didn’t have enough body armor and reinforced vehicles? Didn’t Clinton spend the “peace dividend” (after the end of the Cold War) and neglect the military? Didn’t he reduce the size of our forces, so that we became stretched thin with our involvement in Iraq?

No question about it. And, as I recall, we didn't get a tax cut with the "peace dividend", either.

So, he's hardly in a position to complain about "no tax hike" when the military had to be re-equipped.

24 posted on 11/28/2007 7:07:53 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson