Posted on 11/28/2007 8:30:59 AM PST by NCjim
Dwayne Allen Dail, who was wrongly convicted of rape and spent 18 years in prison, was expected in court Wednesday in a civil suit for back child support.
Lorraine Michaels, the mother of Dail's son, filed the lawsuit. The suit does not specify how much money she wants, as is normal in North Carolina, but asks a "reasonable sum for the care and maintenance of the minor child" for the years Dail was in prison.
In August, new DNA evidence showed Dail did not rape a 12-year-old Goldsboro girl on Sept. 4, 1987. Dail is entitled to $360,000 in compensation from the state for the wrongful conviction and imprisonment.
Dail said his son recently moved to Florida to live with him.
(Excerpt) Read more at wral.com ...
$20,000 per year of imprisonment? That’s derisory.
360 k????? thats all????? BS. If I were him I would sue to bankrupt the State!!! They could buy me off for a cool 10 mil.
That’s ridiculous. I would sue her for false imprisonment
he deserves 20 million (year=million) from the state.
Sue the state and make them pay the back child support. False imprisonment should buy you a free ride for the rest of your life. Then the state will be more careful.
Related story...
Standard procedure dictated that all the evidence from Dails case should have been destroyed after a period of time, but authorities found a journal kept by the lead investigator in the case, which he passed to another detective upon his retirement. It led Dail’s lawyers to a box of evidence stored at the police department that had never been destroyed because it wasn’t used at trial.
Strickland said he pushed forward with the prosecution because the 12-year-old victim positively identified Dail as her attacker. Dail had been spending time with numerous friends in the neighborhood before and after the rape, and the girl’s mother asked the victim if Dail was the man who had attacked her, said Christine Mumma, Dail’s current lawyer.
Hair found at the scene was also found to be microscopically consistent with Dail’s.
“We had, not the strongest case in the world, but we had a case. And in the days before DNA, that’s what we did,” Strickland said.
“You had a little, 12-year-old girl who, there is no question about it, she was brutally raped. And she said, ‘That’s the man who did it,’” he continued.
Strickland said he told the victim they could stop the case before going to trial if she had any doubts, but she stayed solid in her identification of Dail in testimony at the 1989 trial.
At one point, prosecutors offered Dail a plea deal under which he would plead no contest to charges of taking indecent liberties with a minor and receive only three years’ probation in return.
Asked by WRAL why he didn’t take the deal, Dail responded: “I didn’t do it. Nobody would have gotten justice in that. Me or her. Somebody did that to that girl. And somebody needs to pay for that.”
During the trial’s closing arguments, Strickland remarked on Dail’s remarkable confidence in his innocence in the face of such serious charges, Dail said.
After being sentenced to two life sentences, plus 18 years, Dail continued to maintain his innocence from behind bars. His exoneration justified all that confidence, Dail said at his release Tuesday.
“I’d like to tell Mr. Donald Strickland that I’m as confident and cavalier today as I have ever been in my life,” Dail said.
Strickland expressed regret about Dail’s wrongful conviction, but said he acted on the evidence available at the time.
“I feel very bad about it, but I don’t have any guilt, because I don’t think I’ve done anything wrong,” he said. “I proceeded with the case as I had it.”
Dail said he was undone by his faith in the justice system.
“I can tell you this for a fact, I would not walkin there with the faith I had when I was 20,” he said. “I never thought that I could ever be convicted. I had faith in a system that I was innocent.
“And I didnt have no idea that innocent people were sent to prison. I thought if you didnt do anything, then you didnt have nothing to worry about,” he continued. “And that is ignorant.”
According to the N.C. Center for Actual Innocence, around 200 wrongly imprisoned inmates across the nation have been exonerated by the work of nonprofit agencies. The Center receives around 1,000 claims of innocence by N.C. inmates each year, said Mumma, who is also the Centers executive director.
Successfully exonerating wrongly convicted inmates is an uphill battle, because eyewitness testimony and physical evidence can often prove to be inaccurate, helping move juries to wrongful convictions, Mumma said.
You write down all the humans that come into contact with each case, and there is a lot of potential for human error unintentional, unavoidable human error, she said earlier.
Strickland agreed that Dail was the victim of judicial system that should have protected his good name and freedom.
“I’ve had some stronger (cases), I’ve had some weaker, and there is just no perfect system of justice,” he said.
With an official reopening of the case by the Goldsboro Police Department, that judicial system is once more investigating the 20-year-old rape. Investigators are talking with the victim again and reviewing the old case files.
“It definitely has challenges because of the time frame, but I’d like to feel pretty confident that we’ll reach a resolution,” Sgt. Chad Calloway of the Goldsboro police said.
The newly uncovered DNA evidence could be the key to breaking the case, said investigators, who declined to say if they had found possible matches in the State Bureau of Investigation database.
Released from prison, Dail said he’s moved past anger at the child who identified him as the rapist and bitterness at the real perpetrator.
“I cannot possible have hard feelings against a child who has been sexually assaulted,” he said. “Bitterness doesn’t hurt anyone, but yourself and maybe the people that you love.”
In the future, Dail said he may write a book or go to college. He’s also enjoying reconnecting with his 17-year-old son Chris Michaels, who was born after he went to prison.
“He’s grown up only seeing his father in prison, and that’s a terrible way for a kid to grow up,” Dail said.
“It’s over, so we can now start spending more time together and getting to know each other a lot better,” Michaels said.
For now, Dail said he’s enjoying the “Four F’s”: “Freedom. Family. Friends. And food.”
“Standard procedure dictated that all the evidence from Dails case should have been destroyed after a period of time, but authorities found a journal kept by the lead investigator in the case, which he passed to another detective upon his retirement. It led Dails lawyers to a box of evidence stored at the police department that had never been destroyed because it wasnt used at trial.”
THAT SCARES ME. This was pure luck — how many others are scapegoated and have there ticket to freedom, destroyed? Protect the prosecutor in the end.
It would be cheaper to arrange a dirt nap...
There’s precedent in NC over what the state pays for wrongful imprisonment. A few years ago a guy named Darryl Hunt was found innocent after serving 18 years. The State paid him $358,545.00. He proceeded to sue the City where he was prosecuted and got $1.65 million tax free from the City Council in a settlement.
He got two live sentences plus 18 years... but they had been willing to plee bargan it to just 3 years probation. What the hell is wrong with out justice system?
“...but they had been willing to plee bargan it to just 3 years probation.”
That was a big HUH? for me too - probation for raping a little girl? I wonder if the prosocution figured they had a REALLY weak case and figured he wouldn’t get convicted on the weak evidence if it went to trial. Or - even worse, the Strikland guy knew he had weak evidence and seeing that the guy was very confident and calm while claiming his innocence, Strikland started to think “Hey, maybe this guy IS innocent?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.