Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abstinence Activist Elected to School Board that Fired Him
LifeSiteNews ^ | 11/27/07 | Matthew Cullinan Hoffman

Posted on 11/27/2007 4:23:02 PM PST by wagglebee

PRIOR LAKE, Minnesota, November 27, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - After being fired for promoting abstinence among students at the school where he worked, ex school supervisor Chris Lind has been elected to the Prior Lake-Savage district school board in Minnesota.

Lind, who was a hallway and parking lot supervisor at a local high school and a "conservative Christian" was told by District Human Resource Director Tony Massaros that he could not discuss abstinence from sexual activity with any students, during or after school hours, on or off campus, according to a friend who witnessed the meeting. 

Lind was told that this restriction included Sunday Bible school classes at his own church, and it even extended to former students of the school.  He was also told to take down his "My Space" website, which purportedly gave advice to the many students who sought his counsel.

However, after the Prior Lake-Savage School District fired Lind on the recommendation of Superintendent Tom Westerhaus, the voters returned him to the District in the months following, electing him to the school board early this month.

Westerhaus soon after announced his resignation, stating that he couldn't continue to function as the employee of the man whom he had fired so recently.

What galled Westerhaus the most was the fact that the people of the school district had clearly sided with Lind. "It isn't that one person. It's the 3,400 people who said he's one of the best candidates for School Board," Westerhaus told a local reporter. "I'm being told this was courageous. I don't know that's what this was, but I'm taking a stand. Maybe that's what we need now in education more than ever."

Chuck Darrell of the Minnesota Family Council, noted that the school district that fired Lind has a "sex ed program" that promotes promiscuity and unnatural sexual behavior. "Perhaps Lind would have kept his job if he had limited his discussions to other comprehensive sex education topics such as how to get an abortion or oral sex with a dental dam," Darrell writes on MFC's blog, which has covered the issue for months.

"The recent rise in STDs and STIs in Minnesota is proof that current sex education curricula are a colossal failure," says Darrell. "And, as long as schools continue to fire personnel for promoting abstinence then we can only expect more of the same."

Although Lind will soon be a school board member, he has not ruled out the possibility of a lawsuit against the same board for his firing.

Related Links:

Homosexuality, abstinence figure huge in suburban election drama
http://www.tcdailyplanet.net/node/8083

JIM FRY TESTIMONY
http://bp3.blogger.com/LhhzMRZ5CEc/RnrBlO2nWrI/AAAAAAAAADo/f...



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: abstinence; ac; censorship; education; moralabsolutes; pc; persecution; sexpositiveagenda; thewormhasturned; tolerance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: wagglebee

No training at all. But it doesn’t take any training to put a condom on a mop handle either - and I wouldn’t want the janitor roaming the hallways showing the “proper usage” of that either.


21 posted on 11/27/2007 4:57:47 PM PST by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Although Lind will soon be a school board member, he has not ruled out the possibility of a lawsuit against the same board for his firing.

This is the courageous part. Cleaning house one room at a time.

22 posted on 11/27/2007 4:58:20 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geopyg

Its likely he had at least some contact with students (and if a Christian) was friendly and became friends with some...

I don’t know anyone that would believe it weird to discuss personal matters with real friends, and if this guy was older maybe functioned as a mentor of sorts for some to “pass along his wisdom”.

That’s not questionable..(of course this is all ‘what-if’) thought?!


23 posted on 11/27/2007 5:00:25 PM PST by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Sounds like he was “defeated” and knows it (look for slander of the good-councilman) now that the educrat has lost..that’s what the left does when they loose, they choose dirty ‘trickery’..!


24 posted on 11/27/2007 5:01:57 PM PST by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

For later.


25 posted on 11/27/2007 5:02:03 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: geopyg

I agree with you. A hall and parking lot monitor should not be discussing sex with the students, even if he is saying all the right things. His job is to monitor the hallways and parking lots, not teach sex ed.

However, I do think the school district was horribly wrong in trying to restrict him from his personal my space and from his Sunday School teaching. They do not own him, and his personal life is none of their business.

I do think it sends a message to the school district that the parents are unhappy with the current policy, which is great. He will have a much better opportunity to change things now.


26 posted on 11/27/2007 5:33:13 PM PST by ga medic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
What galled Westerhaus the most was the fact that the people of the school district had clearly sided with Lind. "It isn't that one person. It's the 3,400 people who said he's one of the best candidates for School Board," Westerhaus told a local reporter. "I'm being told this was courageous. I don't know that's what this was, but I'm taking a stand. Maybe that's what we need now in education more than ever."

Sure, take your stand against the wishes of 3,400 people and quit. What have you proved? You've just made 3,400 people happier. Idiot.

What a power hungry egotist. What ever happened to the school board actually representing the people who elected them? It's about time parents took back THEIR school district that's paying with THEIR taxes for the education of THEIR children.

27 posted on 11/27/2007 6:32:41 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abclily; aberaussie; albertp; AliVeritas; Amelia; AnAmericanMother; andie74; AVNevis; bannie; ...

Public Education Ping

This list is for articles relating to public education. mcvey and republican professor have asked me to take over the list. If you want on or off this ping list, please FReepmail me.
28 posted on 11/27/2007 6:33:25 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I live very nearby. The facts are different. Lind was fired because he violated his contract by meeting with students off campus.

He was then warned, but ignored the warnings. Basically, he was insubordiate.

I’m not even sure how many voters here knew about it but its an example of how things get spun and magnfied to suit one sides purpose.


29 posted on 11/27/2007 6:33:45 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (Dems will impeach Bush in 2008; mark my words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If only all democrats would show such courage, things would improve dramtically.

LOL!
30 posted on 11/27/2007 6:56:44 PM PST by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er; All

“I live very nearby. The facts are different. Lind was fired because he violated his contract by meeting with students off campus.”

How do you know his contract forbid him to meet students off campus? I know there was no such provision in my contract as a teaching assistant, nor is there one in my contract as a teacher. I somehow doubt it would be enforceable if there was.

Any lawyers out there want to comment?


31 posted on 11/27/2007 7:02:14 PM PST by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“What galled Westerhaus the most was the fact that the people of
the school district had clearly sided with Lind. “

This is as good as the griping of that Greeley, CO mayor (RINO)
that got the heave-ho in the latest election for being pro-Illegal.

Some people just can’t understand why the sun doesn’t always shine
on them and on them alone!


32 posted on 11/27/2007 7:07:52 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Democracy must really suck for leftists like Westerhaus.


33 posted on 11/27/2007 7:10:18 PM PST by Hoodat (satan always overplays his hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Student

How do you know his contract forbid him to meet students off campus?
**********
I heard that he was warned after the first incident- making this more a case of insubordination than a legal breach.

The Superintendent had quite the ego- I can’t say I’m sorry he’s out.

It’s a fasinating thing to watch a situation get spun politically, regardless of who was right.

I may vote for Lind next time, but I would be surprised if he has a legal case. If he sues, he’s not going to ingratiate himself with the public. He should let it pass and do his thing at board meetings. my two cents


34 posted on 11/27/2007 7:31:03 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (Dems will impeach Bush in 2008; mark my words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
thanks, it’s great that we win a battle every once in a while.
35 posted on 11/27/2007 7:42:05 PM PST by Coleus (Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ga medic

So are you saying that all employees of the school including teachers should be restricted from talking to students except for the subjects they teach? It seems to me that there would be a lot of opportunity for a hall and parking lot monitor to interface with kids about sex. What is he supposed to be monitoring anyways. Heck in the 70’s the hall and parking lots is where kids would make out.


36 posted on 11/27/2007 7:42:56 PM PST by sbhitchc (Now go to your room and don't come out until dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This Westerhaus guy sounds like he’s in the wrong country. Maybe he should check out opportunities for fascist apparatchiks in Ontario.


37 posted on 11/27/2007 7:47:48 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“Lind was told that this restriction included Sunday Bible school classes at his own church, and it even extended to former students of the school. He was also told to take down his “My Space” website, which purportedly gave advice to the many students who sought his counsel.”

And how is this legal?


38 posted on 11/27/2007 7:51:54 PM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Westerhaus soon after announced his resignation, stating that he couldn't continue to function as the employee of the man whom he had fired so recently.

What galled Westerhaus the most was the fact that the people of the school district had clearly sided with Lind.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

39 posted on 11/27/2007 9:01:53 PM PST by latina4dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Lind was told that this restriction included Sunday Bible school classes at his own church

Wrong answer. The govt has no say what is taught in a church so long as the church's activities don't infringe upon anyone else's rights.
40 posted on 11/27/2007 9:07:06 PM PST by JamesP81 ("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson