Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/27/2007 4:02:08 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Nope, I showed up voted and left.


2 posted on 11/27/2007 4:04:03 PM PST by A. Morgan (Fred Thompson’s record is solid and he does not waffle. Fred for PREZ in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The real problem is that such laws prevent non-citizens and illegal aliens from voting in elections. Therefore disenfranchising a significant segment of democratic support.


3 posted on 11/27/2007 4:06:13 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Is there ANYTHING truthful coming out of the endless propaganda from the evil democrat national committee?


4 posted on 11/27/2007 4:08:31 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (“If a tax cut increases government revenues, you haven’t cut taxes enough.” –Milton Friedman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I’m 37 and still have to show a Wawa clerk my ID to get a carton of smokes (as if they’d know a passport from a library card).

No reason to not have to show ID to vote unless, of course, you don’t have one...in which case you won’t get to vote [Dummycrat].


5 posted on 11/27/2007 4:09:52 PM PST by Impugn (I am standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
But Michael P. McDonald, an assistant professor at George Mason University, said one election isn't enough to draw any conclusions about Indiana's law

Yeah, and if turnout was lower do you think there would be such a qualification? Ab-so-freakin-lutely not. It would be wall to wall I-told-you-so's (not necessarily from prof. McDonald, but they'd find an expert to raise the clarion call).

6 posted on 11/27/2007 4:11:48 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I sure hope there are no FReepers around here surprised by this.

Absolutely nothing wrong with having to show a pic ID to vote. This should be the minimum needed.


7 posted on 11/27/2007 4:31:32 PM PST by upchuck (Hildabeaste as Prez... unimaginable, devastating misery! She will redefine "How bad can it get?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Bookmarked. Ammunition for the inevitable Democrat caterwauling every time a Photo ID law comes up for a vote.


9 posted on 11/27/2007 4:36:57 PM PST by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
But...but...India doesn't have a record of racial tension and divisive discrimination that we have in the United States...




< /sarcasm>

10 posted on 11/27/2007 4:41:15 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
There is no logical reason not to require ID to vote.
11 posted on 11/27/2007 5:00:00 PM PST by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I would like to know if there is a correlation between “red” states and states that require ID at the polls.

I suspect the Dems and libs do a lot of fraud. If most “red” states are also “ID required” states, that would bear my theory some credence.


12 posted on 11/27/2007 5:13:55 PM PST by Marie2 (I used to be disgusted. . .now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

bump


13 posted on 11/27/2007 5:14:43 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1931449/posts

More than 49,000 ineligible voters on Texas rolls
Houston Chronicle ^ | R.G. RATCLIFFE

Posted on 11/27/2007 4:55:29 PM PST by Dubya

AUSTIN — More than 49,000 people on the Texas voter registration rolls in May may not have been eligible to vote, state auditors reported today.

The ineligible voters included 23,114 possible felons, 23,576 people who were deceased and 2,359 voters with duplicate records. The auditors said the ineligible voters represented 0.4 percent of the state’s 12.3 million registered voters.


14 posted on 11/27/2007 5:50:51 PM PST by Haddit (Hunter is still the Best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Great news! This takes away the phony rat argument that photo id lowers turn out. Now they have to think up another lie to get their illegals into the voting booth.


18 posted on 11/28/2007 5:21:19 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatives live in the truth. Liberals live in lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson