Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/26/2007 2:04:53 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: MizSterious; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...

Ping


2 posted on 11/26/2007 2:05:12 PM PST by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Maybe they can put a picture of Mao on the Aussie dollar?


4 posted on 11/26/2007 2:06:57 PM PST by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
During the campaign Mr Rudd, who speaks fluent Mandarin and has lived in China...

Oh wonderful.

5 posted on 11/26/2007 2:07:03 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Australia has a queen?


6 posted on 11/26/2007 2:07:21 PM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

So long Australia.


7 posted on 11/26/2007 2:07:31 PM PST by Ingtar (The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his Lacking Decisive Stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Can we run this through Babelfish so the political terms are in proper American? Republican seems to have a different connotation than we can adapt to even with Republicans acting like spend-crazy Democrats.


8 posted on 11/26/2007 2:09:06 PM PST by RightWhale (anti-razors are pro-life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk; naturalman1975; Aussie Dasher; All

Hey Aussie Freepers is this true???


9 posted on 11/26/2007 2:09:10 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
He said yesterday that he would withdraw Australian troops from Iraq and ratify the Kyoto pact on climate change.

Hang onto your seats Mates, your grand/proud country is in for a helluvaride.

10 posted on 11/26/2007 2:09:50 PM PST by yoe ( NO THIRD TERM FOR THE CLINTON'S!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Australia will keep the monarchy until at least the Queen dies. She is still liked there by many. It will be a voter turnout problem for the republicans. There is also some benefits of being in the Commonwealth that the Aussies won’t want to readily give up.


11 posted on 11/26/2007 2:10:01 PM PST by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Is this Oz, or Looking-Glass Land?


12 posted on 11/26/2007 2:10:11 PM PST by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I suspect that Rudd will get the rug pulled out from under him. He comes in at a time when the economy is booming. He’s got no where to go but down.


13 posted on 11/26/2007 2:10:18 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
What in the world were they thinking when they voted for this guy?

Oooops ... I bet they asked the same question when we elected Clinton I. I hope they are dissapointed when we reject Clinton II!

14 posted on 11/26/2007 2:10:22 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I would hope the good people of Australia would blanch at this separation from the queen notion. The day will come in the not too distant future when Australia had better have solid ties to Britain and the U.S. Unless Australia wants to become China’s upcoming satellite, it better pull it’s head out.


15 posted on 11/26/2007 2:10:32 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Those pesky republicans!


16 posted on 11/26/2007 2:10:50 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

After they banned guns what else did they expect?


19 posted on 11/26/2007 2:14:16 PM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Mr Rudd has three children and is independently wealthy because of the business success of his wife, Therese Rein, the founder of the Ingeus empire which bids for contracts to assist disabled people back into work.

JFnK jr?

PS First with it's Bush's fault!

28 posted on 11/26/2007 2:22:29 PM PST by rocksblues (Just enforce the law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Sounds like Australians have elected their own Dennis Kucinich.
30 posted on 11/26/2007 2:25:46 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I have never believed in MONARCHIES. They are rarefied welfare recipients on the permanent dole at the expense of the taxpayer. They have no place in the 21st century. I might also add that we as Americans and especially conservative “republicans” with a small “r” should begin in earnest to export the ideology and principles of our founding fathers. For far too long we have imported the failed ideas of others. It’s time to fight back, the cultural and ideological war is just as important as the one we fight with bullets and bombs. We cannot afford to win on one front and yet lose on the other.


33 posted on 11/26/2007 2:30:32 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

36 posted on 11/26/2007 2:37:51 PM PST by Constitution Day (Everything was fine until membership lost its privileges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

To amend the Australian constitution to make Australian a republic, the measure must:

1. Pass a majority of States (4 out of 6)

2. Pass a majority of the whole number of voters nationwide.

Here are the votes in 2000:

States, must win 4

New South Wales - 46.43%

Victoria - 49.84%

Queensland - 37.44%

Western Australia - 41.48%

South Australia - 43.57%

Tasmania - 40.37%

Territories, national vote only:

Australian Capital Territory - 63.27%

Northern Territory - 48.77%

National total - 45.13%

The republicans “might” be able to get a nationwide majority if they run up the numbers in Victoria, New South Wales, and the Australian Capital Territory. (Canberra, whose votes only count in the nationwide vote, not the state vote.)

The question is can the republicans get four states? In 1999 they didn’t top 50% in any of them.

I’m wondering in 2010 if they will do much better?


38 posted on 11/26/2007 2:46:24 PM PST by GreenLanternCorps (Thompson for President: 2008, 2012: Jindal for President 2016, 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson