Skip to comments.
Are you going to vote in the November 2008 election no matter who wins the Republican primary?
Posted on 11/25/2007 5:29:03 PM PST by cradle of freedom
I would like to know if you are going to vote in the November 2008 election even if your candidate does not win. Will you stay home if you don't like the Republican candidate?
Another thing that I have often wondered about is whether people actually stay home when they are disheartened. News commentators often say that some voters may have decided to stay home because they were not happy with the candidates. I think that is a mistake because even if you do not like the person at the top of the ticket you should at least vote for the other candidates. Have you every actually stayed home and not gone to the polls at all because you were not happy with a candidate?
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: elections; marines; republican; rudyhaterswarm; teachthegopalesson; wowicanseemynavel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620 ... 661-676 next last
To: cradle of freedom
Yes. I can always skip the Presidential line
581
posted on
11/26/2007 6:37:56 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
To: cradle of freedom
I have always voted GOP and plan to again.
582
posted on
11/26/2007 6:40:42 AM PST
by
Big Horn
(Life is a sexually transmitted disease that is 100% fatal . Author unknown)
To: fightinJAG
583
posted on
11/26/2007 6:43:32 AM PST
by
Paperdoll
( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
To: cradle of freedom
As goes Missouri, so goes the nation (except for 1954).
I will go to the polls in 2008 (to help Sam Graves beat Kay “carpetbagger” Barnes). I will likely vote for any Republican nominee, except for Guiliani.
It seems to me that if some folks spent as much time ensuring Giuliani doesn’t get the nomination that they do castigating those who won’t vote for him, we wouldn’t have this problem.
584
posted on
11/26/2007 6:52:46 AM PST
by
RabidBartender
(Al-Qaeda doesn't need an intelligence network. They have the U.S. media.)
To: G8 Diplomat
585
posted on
11/26/2007 6:54:53 AM PST
by
capebuffalo
(Call to Action)
To: capebuffalo
“I would like to know if you are going to vote in the November 2008 election even if your candidate does not win.”
Yes.
586
posted on
11/26/2007 6:57:54 AM PST
by
flaglady47
(Thinking out loud while grinding teeth in political frustration)
To: RabidBartender
It seems to me that if some folks spent as much time ensuring Giuliani doesnt get the nomination that they do castigating those who wont vote for him, we wouldnt have this problem.BINGO!!! The solution is simple. If you want to defeat Hillary, don't SPLIT the Party WIDE OPEN by nominating a candidate totally unacceptable to your base. If that happens, there will be only one Party that will PASSIONATELY UNITED, FIRED UP AND ENERGIZED--and you can guess which Party that will be!
587
posted on
11/26/2007 6:58:34 AM PST
by
stockstrader
(We need a conservative who will ENERGIZE the Party, not a liberal who will DEMORALIZE it!)
To: flaglady47
For me, the answer is “No.”
588
posted on
11/26/2007 7:00:19 AM PST
by
Oberon
(What does it take to make government shrink?)
To: cradle of freedom
I HAVE to vote so I can bitch for the next 4 years.
Won't be for Rudy though.
589
posted on
11/26/2007 7:01:21 AM PST
by
Manic_Episode
(Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
To: RabidBartender
It seems to me that if some folks spent as much time ensuring Giuliani doesn’t get the nomination that they do castigating those who won’t vote for him, we wouldn’t have this problem. Precisely.
590
posted on
11/26/2007 7:06:16 AM PST
by
B Knotts
(Tancredo '08!)
To: cradle of freedom
Damned right. The worst Republican candidate (And I do not count Ron Paul among them!) is better than the “best” RAT Candidate.
591
posted on
11/26/2007 7:07:59 AM PST
by
Redleg Duke
("All gave some, and some gave all!")
To: rineaux
If we keep fishin from the same ol pond, were gonna keep catchin the same ol big mouth bass.
Lets truly throw these bums outta Washington. How long do we have to endure this type of corruption in D.C.?
To: willk
“So God would rather see Hillary as President?”
My reply:
So God would rather see Giuliani as President?
So fellow Republicans, knowing that a pro-abortion candidate is unacceptable to millions of fellow Republicans, would rather take that chance?
593
posted on
11/26/2007 7:16:54 AM PST
by
mission9
(It ain't bragging if you can do it.)
To: willk
“So God would rather see Hillary as President?”
My reply:
So God would rather see Giuliani as President?
So fellow Republicans, knowing that a pro-abortion candidate is unacceptable to millions of fellow Republicans, would rather take that chance?
594
posted on
11/26/2007 7:19:12 AM PST
by
mission9
(It ain't bragging if you can do it.)
To: fightinJAG
This apparent conundrum is a false dilemma. I am responsible for murder, because I support the Iraq war? Are those who support life imprisonment responsible for murder when a released killer kills again? Am I responsible for my neighbor’s house burning down because I failed to pay my fire dues?
The contingencies of blame get stretched mighty thin. Those who kill are responsible for murder, not some Rube Goldberg cause and effect scenario that points to an alleged “enabler.” One thing that will not break are my vows to God.
The blame will lie solely on those who took for granted the votes of the Christian right, and then found the breaking point of our compromise.
595
posted on
11/26/2007 7:33:13 AM PST
by
mission9
(It ain't bragging if you can do it.)
To: BillyBoy
Your defense of Huckabee is admirable. The Thompsonites are in the process of burning bridges and eating their own. I am supporting Mitt because he has the best chance to beat Hillary, but Huck is way better than Fred.
596
posted on
11/26/2007 7:37:15 AM PST
by
mission9
(It ain't bragging if you can do it.)
To: Paleo Conservative
“What? Stay home and let Hillary win? Hell no!”
DITTO THAT!!
597
posted on
11/26/2007 7:38:15 AM PST
by
JZelle
To: cradle of freedom
I will vote for the Republican nominee. Period.
I will not stay home.
I will not vote third party.
I will not write in a name.
I will not vote for the Democrat.
598
posted on
11/26/2007 8:58:29 AM PST
by
EveningStar
(I'll vote for the Republican nominee because the USA is more important than my ego.)
To: cradle of freedom
599
posted on
11/26/2007 9:01:47 AM PST
by
subterfuge
(HILLARY IS: She who must NOT be Dismayed)
To: rineaux
I have promised myself that I will never again vote for a RINO. I will not join the “fear of Hillary” camp. I will vote my conscience in the primaries, and if I have a chance, I will do the same in the general election. If not, I will not vote. I am sure that there will be enough converts from the “sky is falling, quick vote for him even if he is a RINO” to offset my non-vote. Flame away.
600
posted on
11/26/2007 9:12:12 AM PST
by
alarm rider
(Why should I not vote my conscience?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620 ... 661-676 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson