The amero conspiracy

The Boston Globe ^ | November 25, 2007 | Drake Bennett

[Toddsterpatriot]

Carl Marx... I know you were having a hard time with that one.

Yeah, I have a hard time when you misspell a name like that.

You trash anyone who recognizes what our leadership is up to.

No, just stupid liars.

In the face of tangible proof, you continue to hurl insults at others.

You posted tangible proof of something? Where?

[Heartofsong83]

Correct, also look at the results of their last provincial election - their conservative party beat the separatists and reduced them to 3rd party status (although that was also because they were so extreme on social issues).

[Heartofsong83]

Correct. The way you mentioned is fully constitutional as well, unlike the proposed NAU sellout which needs to be stopped at all costs.

[DoughtyOne]

Carl Marx... I know you were having a hard time with that one.

Yeah, I have a hard time when you misspell a name like that.

Google recognizes the name either way.  Perhaps you should run names by Google if you're having any problems.

You trash anyone who recognizes what our leadership is up to.

No, just stupid liars.

Then that would have to mean you.  The North Ameican Union is a bonified plan.  The Tri-laterial Security proposal was made by Bush.  The FTAA wasn't coined by internet conspirators.

Like I said earlier, if you need to catch up I'm willing to stand by...

In the face of tangible proof, you continue to hurl insults at others.

You posted tangible proof of something? Where?

Once again, you comprehension skills come into play.  And this after you claiming others had that problem.

Tangible proof has been presented on this thread.  I didn't say I provided it.

[Toddsterpatriot]

The North Ameican Union is a bonified plan.

Does Google recognize that misspelling too?

The Tri-laterial Security proposal was made by Bush.

Yeah, security is bad.

The FTAA wasn't coined by internet conspirators.

Yeah, trade is bad.

Tangible proof has been presented on this thread.

Tangible proof was provided showing that "Those that talked down the plan to build a transnational corridor were also slotted in the kook-file"

I didn't say I provided it.

No kidding.

[DoughtyOne]

The North Ameican Union is a bonified plan.

Does Google recognize that misspelling too?

This is what adults refer to as a typing error.

The Tri-laterial Security proposal was made by Bush.

Yeah, security is bad.

Hitching our future to a trilateral multi-national agreement that sees our borders with two other nations relaxed is bad.  We can't even control our southern border now.

Tens of thousands of people from terrorist states are coming across our southern border now, but you think a plan that would see that border relaxed would improve our security and sovereignty.

Ooookay...

The FTAA wasn't coined by internet conspirators.

Yeah, trade is bad.

A free trade agreement that would see two representatives from every nation in the Americas sitting on a multi-national body of governance, would see decisions made by that body where Venezuela would have as many votes as the United States as to what OUR trade policies would be in the future.  In addition to that, many non-trade type policy decisions would be made by this body since they could impact on trade.  Border maters, security matters, immigration matters, business related mattters, could all come under this commission's jurisdiction.

You think this would improve on our trade, security and sovereignty?

Ooookay...

Tangible proof has been presented on this thread.

Tangible proof was provided showing that "Those that talked down the plan to build a transnational corridor were also slotted in the kook-file"

Tangible proof was provided that an effort to create a North American Union was a reality.

I didn't say I provided it.

No kidding.

That's right.

[William Terrell]

In my view, paranoia and cynicism toward politicians and any political activity is robust mental health.

[DoughtyOne]

Dare I say it...

Our Founding Fathers were of the same mind.

[Toddsterpatriot]

This is what adults refer to as a typing error.

is a bonified plan

Yeah, an adult who doesn't know Latin.

Hitching our future to a trilateral multi-national agreement that sees our borders with two other nations relaxed is bad.

I didn't see anything about relaxing our border.

We can't even control our southern border now.

We need a wall now.

A free trade agreement that would see two representatives from every nation in the Americas sitting on a multi-national body of governance, would see decisions made by that body where Venezuela would have as many votes as the United States as to what OUR trade policies would be in the future.

You think Venezuela could make us do something we didn't want to? LOL!

Tangible proof was provided that an effort to create a North American Union was a reality

Proof where? That an effort was made by whom?

[DoughtyOne]

This is what adults refer to as a typing error.

is a bonified plan

Yeah, an adult who doesn't know Latin.

Perhaps you could act as if you knew English for a moment.  It would sure help.

You keep changing the emphasis of the issue we've already addressed.

"Is a bonified plan", wasn't included in the context of me misspelling the word "American".

Hitching our future to a trilateral multi-national agreement that sees our borders with two other nations relaxed is bad.

I didn't see anything about relaxing our border.

That is the supposed bonus of a tri-lateral security plan.  It will allow improved movements of good across borders.  It will also make travel across borders easier.

We can't even control our southern border now.

We need a wall now.

We agree on that point.  What we don't seem to agree on is that wall will be utterly useless, if our leaders sign on to a plan that essentially allows free access to move across our international borders.

A free trade agreement that would see two representatives from every nation in the Americas sitting on a multi-national body of governance, would see decisions made by that body where Venezuela would have as many votes as the United States as to what OUR trade policies would be in the future.

You think Venezuela could make us do something we didn't want to? LOL!

I don't see this as a laughing matter.  Venezuela could and probably would cancel out our vote on nearly every issue raised on the international trade commission.  From there on out it would be a free-for-all of nations that would or would not agree with us on a variety of matters where sovereign internal decision making had previously taken place.

It's not a matter of us allowing Venezuela to make us do something.  It would become an issue of participation in western hemispheric trade, if the governing body went against us more often than not.

Tangible proof was provided that an effort to create a North American Union was a reality

Proof where? That an effort was made by whom?

It's there.  Perhaps you can figure it out if you try really hard.

[philetus]

The “NAU” is a conspiracy theory of course “

DOH!

http://www.spp.gov/

[philetus]

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.”

“It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

DAVID ROCKEFELLER
June 1991

[Toddsterpatriot]

"Is a bonified plan", wasn't included in the context of me misspelling the word "American".

When I asked about your misspelling, I was referring to the misspelling of bona fide. I ignored your typing error.

It's there.

If you say so, it must be true. LOL!

[philetus]

We’re talking about an arrangement of government that the vast majority of We the People don’t want any part of.”

JAMES PAUL WARBURG, Foreign Agent of the Rothschild Dynasty, major player in the Federal Reserve Act scam: on February 17, 1950, while speaking before the United States Senate, this pompous Internationalist boasted confidently, “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”

[1rudeboy]

I think he means the people that he imagined said what he thought they should say in order so that he could call them idiots and use them as an illustration of what he thinks he should say but can’t because he never found someone that would allow him to say it.

[1rudeboy]

One other thing. I am in favor of the FTAA. So why don’t we discuss some real concerns instead of making up stories about the imaginary people who dismiss the real people worried about the FTAA as “kooks?”

[1rudeboy]

I’m also beginning to understand why people complain about the U.S. using the SPP mechanism to establish, for example, biometric standards for passports. See, a biometric passport represents a higher security standard than the non-biometric passport it replaces. How else are people going to be able to claim that the U.S. is doing nothing about border security if the new biometric standard is allowed to remain?

[Toddsterpatriot]

How else are people going to be able to claim that the U.S. is doing nothing about border security if the new biometric standard is allowed to remain?

They'll find something else to whine about, they always do.

[Schwaeky]

Didn’t they do that already? Wasn’t it called the Greater Far East Coprosperity Sphere???

[roamer_1]

Outside of a maybe a political union is there anything about the “NAU” that you would not want to be put into effect?

How about bloody-well none of it?