Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot
The North Ameican Union is a bonified plan.

Does Google recognize that misspelling too?

This is what adults refer to as a typing error.

The Tri-laterial Security proposal was made by Bush.

Yeah, security is bad.

Hitching our future to a trilateral multi-national agreement that sees our borders with two other nations relaxed is bad.  We can't even control our southern border now.

Tens of thousands of people from terrorist states are coming across our southern border now, but you think a plan that would see that border relaxed would improve our security and sovereignty.

Ooookay...

The FTAA wasn't coined by internet conspirators.

Yeah, trade is bad.

A free trade agreement that would see two representatives from every nation in the Americas sitting on a multi-national body of governance, would see decisions made by that body where Venezuela would have as many votes as the United States as to what OUR trade policies would be in the future.  In addition to that, many non-trade type policy decisions would be made by this body since they could impact on trade.  Border maters, security matters, immigration matters, business related mattters, could all come under this commission's jurisdiction.

You think this would improve on our trade, security and sovereignty?

Ooookay...

Tangible proof has been presented on this thread.

Tangible proof was provided showing that "Those that talked down the plan to build a transnational corridor were also slotted in the kook-file"

Tangible proof was provided that an effort to create a North American Union was a reality.

I didn't say I provided it.

No kidding.

That's right.

126 posted on 11/25/2007 1:15:43 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
This is what adults refer to as a typing error.

is a bonified plan

Yeah, an adult who doesn't know Latin.

Hitching our future to a trilateral multi-national agreement that sees our borders with two other nations relaxed is bad.

I didn't see anything about relaxing our border.

We can't even control our southern border now.

We need a wall now.

A free trade agreement that would see two representatives from every nation in the Americas sitting on a multi-national body of governance, would see decisions made by that body where Venezuela would have as many votes as the United States as to what OUR trade policies would be in the future.

You think Venezuela could make us do something we didn't want to? LOL!

Tangible proof was provided that an effort to create a North American Union was a reality

Proof where? That an effort was made by whom?

129 posted on 11/25/2007 1:24:45 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (What came first, the bad math or the goldbuggery?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson