Posted on 11/24/2007 6:05:40 PM PST by Travis McGee
Even experienced banker friends tell me that they think the worst of the US banking troubles are over and that things are slowly getting back to normal. What is lacking in their rosy optimism is the realization of the scale of the ongoing deterioration in credit markets globally, centered in the American asset-backed securities market, and especially in the market for CDOs—Collateralized Debt Obligations and CMOs—Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. By now every serious reader has heard the term “It’s a crisis in Sub-Prime US home mortgage debt.” What almost no one I know understands is that the Sub-Prime problem is but the tip of a colossal iceberg that is in a slow meltdown. I offer one recent example to illustrate my point that the “Financial Tsunami” is only beginning.
Deutsche Bank got a hard shock a few days ago when a judge in the state of Ohio in the USA made a ruling that the bank had no legal right to foreclose on 14 homes whose owners had failed to keep current in their monthly mortgage payments. Now this might sound like small beer for Deutsche Bank, one of the world’s largest banks with over €1.1 trillion (Billionen) in assets worldwide. As Hilmar Kopper used to say, “peanuts.” It’s not at all peanuts, however, for the Anglo-Saxon banking world and its European allies like Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas, Barclays Bank, HSBC or others. Why?
A US Federal Judge, C.A. Boyko in Federal District Court in Cleveland, Ohio ruled to dismiss a claim by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. DB’s US subsidiary was seeking to take possession of 14 homes from Cleveland residents living in them, in order to claim the assets.
Here comes the hair in the soup. The Judge asked DB to show documents proving legal title to the 14 homes. DB could not. All DB attorneys could show was a document showing only an “intent to convey the rights in the mortgages.” They could not produce the actual mortgage, the heart of Western property rights since the Magna Charta if not longer.
Again why could Deutsche Bank not show the 14 mortgages on the 14 homes? Because they live in the exotic new world of “global securitization”, where banks like DB or Citigroup buy tens of thousands of mortgages from small local lending banks, “bundle” them into Jumbo new securities which then are rated by Moody’s or Standard & Poors or Fitch, and sell them as bonds to pension funds or other banks or private investors who naively believed they were buying bonds rated AAA, the highest, and never realized that their “bundle” of say 1,000 different home mortgages, contained maybe 20% or 200 mortgages rated “sub-prime,” i.e. of dubious credit quality.
Indeed the profits being earned in the past seven years by the world’s largest financial players from Goldman Sachs to Morgan Stanley to HSBC, Chase, and yes, Deutsche Bank, were so staggering, few bothered to open the risk models used by the professionals who bundled the mortgages. Certainly not the Big Three rating companies who had a criminal conflict of interest in giving top debt ratings. That changed abruptly last August and since then the major banks have issued one after another report of disastrous “sub-prime” losses.
A new unexpected factor
The Ohio ruling that dismissed DB’s claim to foreclose and take back the 14 homes for non-payment, is far more than bad luck for the bank of Josef Ackermann. It is an earth-shaking precedent for all banks holding what they had thought were collateral in form of real estate property.
How this? Because of the complex structure of asset-backed securities and the widely dispersed ownership of mortgage securities (not actual mortgages but the securities based on same) no one is yet able to identify who precisely holds the physical mortgage document. Oops! A tiny legal detail our Wall Street Rocket Scientist derivatives experts ignored when they were bundling and issuing hundreds of billions of dollars worth of CMO’s in the past six or seven years. As of January 2007 some $6.5 trillion of securitized mortgage debt was outstanding in the United States. That’s a lot by any measure!
In the Ohio case Deutsche Bank is acting as “Trustee” for “securitization pools” or groups of disparate investors who may reside anywhere. But the Trustee never got the legal document known as the mortgage. Judge Boyko ordered DB to prove they were the owners of the mortgages or notes and they could not. DB could only argue that the banks had foreclosed on such cases for years without challenge. The Judge then declared that the banks “seem to adopt the attitude that since they have been doing this for so long, unchallenged, this practice equates with legal compliance. Finally put to the test,” the Judge concluded, “their weak legal arguments compel the court to stop them at the gate.” Deutsche Bank has refused comment.
What next?
As news of this legal precedent spreads across the USA like a California brushfire, hundreds of thousands of struggling homeowners who took the bait in times of historically low interest rates to buy a home with often, no money paid down, and the first 2 years with extremely low interest rate in what are known as “interest only” Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs), now face exploding mortgage monthly payments at just the point the US economy is sinking into severe recession. (I regret the plethora of abbreviations used here but it is the fault of Wall Street bankers not this author).
The peak period of the US real estate bubble which began in about 2002 when Alan Greenspan began the most aggressive series of rate cuts in Federal Reserve history was 2005-2006. Greenspan’s intent, as he admitted at the time, was to replace the Dot.com internet stock bubble with a real estate home investment and lending bubble. He argued that was the only way to keep the US economy from deep recession. In retrospect a recession in 2002 would have been far milder and less damaging than what we now face.
Of course, Greenspan has since safely retired, written his memoirs and handed the control (and blame) of the mess over to a young ex-Princeton professor, Ben Bernanke. As a Princeton graduate, I can say I would never trust monetary policy for the world’s most powerful central bank in the hands of a Princeton economics professor. Keep them in their ivy-covered towers.
Now the last phase of every speculative bubble is the one where the animal juices get the most excited. This has been the case with every major speculative bubble since the Holland Tulip speculation of the 1630’s to the South Sea Bubble of 1720 to the 1929 Wall Street crash. It was true as well with the US 2002-2007 Real Estate bubble. In the last two years of the boom in selling real estate loans, banks were convinced they could resell the mortgage loans to a Wall Street financial house who would bundle it with thousands of good better and worse quality mortgage loans and resell them as Collateralized Mortgage Obligation bonds. In the flush of greed, banks became increasingly reckless of the credit worthiness of the prospective home owners. In many cases they did not even bother to check if the person was employed. Who cares? It will be resold and securitized and the risk of mortgage default was historically low.
That was in 2005. The most Sub-prime mortgages written with Adjustable Rate Mortgage contracts were written between 2005-2006, the last and most furious phase of the US bubble. Now a whole new wave of mortgage defaults is about to explode onto the scene beginning January 2008. Between December 2007 and July 1, 2008 more than $690 Billion in mortgages will face an interest rate jump according to the contract terms of the ARMs written two years before. That means market interest rates for those mortgages will explode monthly payments just as recession drives incomes down. Hundreds of thousands of homeowners will be forced to do the last resort of any homeowner: stop monthly mortgage payments.
Here is where the Ohio court decision guarantees that the next phase of the US mortgage crisis will assume Tsunami dimension. If the Ohio Deutsche Bank precedent holds in the appeal to the Supreme Court, millions of homes will be in default but the banks prevented from seizing them as collateral assets to resell. Robert Shiller of Yale, the controversial and often correct author of the book, Irrational Exuberance, predicting the 2001-2 Dot.com stock crash, estimates US housing prices could fall as much as 50% in some areas given how home prices have diverged relative to rents.
The $690 billion worth of “interest only” ARMs due for interest rate hike between now and July 2008 are by and large not Sub-prime but a little higher quality, but only just. There are a total of $1.4 trillion in “interest only” ARMs according to the US research firm, First American Loan Performance. A recent study calculates that, as these ARMs face staggering higher interest costs in the next 9 months, more than $325 billion of the loans will default leaving 1 million property owners in technical mortgage default. But if banks are unable to reclaim the homes as assets to offset the non-performing mortgages, the US banking system and a chunk of the global banking system faces a financial gridlock that will make events to date truly “peanuts” by comparison. We will discuss the global geo-political implications of this in our next report, The Financial Tsunami: Part 2.
© 2007 F. William Engdahl
Financial Nonsense is not the first to cover this, so discrediting the messenger will only go so far.
Have the others covered it as badly as this? It would be hard to believe.
This blog is hardly the only source of information on this ruling. The story came out in major media over a week ago. The judge told Deutsche specifically on October 10 that the foreclosure actions would be dismissed if Deutsche didn’t produce the actual documents showing they owned the mortgage notes. They showed up without them 3 weeks later and the judge kept his promise. I gather that the issue here is not the mortgage notes themselves, but rather the documentation proving that Deutsche actually owned the mortgage notes in question on or before the date it made the foreclosure filing. Deutsche was able to some up with “intent to convey” documents, but never with actual closing documents — scary considering that the mortgage pool in question is less than 18 months old.
The tale of the missing documentation. LOL. This has happened before. The boom/bust of the 1970’s was full of this kind of crap. I know, I audited REITS and found, you guessed it, mortgage loans galore with no documentation.
You hit the nail on the head with the first part of that. Not so sure about the second part.
If DB sold interests in this mortgage pool trust it created, without actually owning every single one of the mortgages in question, their next logical step is to try to quietly pay off the defaulted mortgage notes with cash from DB's own pockets. If they can do it quietly enough, the SEC just might be too busy with other things to remember to send the federal marshalls over to handcuff and haul off the DB guys who authorized the sale of securities via fraudulent representations of underlying collateral.
What legal precedent was set, regarding resolution of legal standing, as far as title?
Yes, the Canadian National Post agrees with your statement regarding outright fraud in the subprime mess..
http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=39d470d5-e383-4991-bdb5-0abb1f6a94bd
The only precedent that I know of was that banking laws were changed to force banks to carry such BS on their books at reduced or zero value instead of continuing to carry them at mortgage value. Most of the stuff was worth 10 - 50% of the book value. Both due to lack of documentation and lack of a market.
And at the time the only securitization was in conforming loans under GNMA and such.
I guess my main point is that all of these scheduled interest rate hikes and losses aren’t locked into concrete. People on both sides will make adjustments to minimize their pain. That is, it is a dynamic situation and not one that has to follow a fixed path to ruin as implied by the article.
As I recall the court ordered that they provide proof of ownership, hence standing in the court, and was given substantial time to do so. The court ruled against them only after that time had expired and they had failed to provide it. It is pretty clear they don’t have the actual documents required and that they were not able to acquire them in a reasonable period of time provided by the court.
I have not laugh so hard in a long time. That was so funny but true. Thanks for the link.
It’s not a blog - next time try actually taking a look at the site and reading some of teh articles prior to engaging your slack jaw.
Lurking’
“Do you have any idea what the “collateralized” in “collateralized debt obligations” means?”
And the point of the entire article IS... they can’t find out who owns the collateral.
Do you actually bother to read the articles or just shoot from the lip.
Lurking’
did you read this one Petron????
how is it wrong???
details, we need to know the details of your analysis.
Lurking’
they tried that already - NO LUCK wise guy!
you should really try to read up about your subject
Lurking’
Or perhaps someone with a loan that is connected to Deutche Bank who hopes they can get away with not paying it...
Econom/Credit/Housing Issues Ping List
If you want on or off this list let me know.
Good luck getting any details out of her.
Petro is more the sideline cheerleader type.
.....millions of homes will be in default but the banks prevented from seizing them as collateral assets to resell.....
The solution for DB and others is simple and assured.
Carry the deed of trust into court. It takes at least 90 days to forclose and during that ample time, the deed of trust can be moved from the depository to the DB vault
.... Start with the fact that they were unable to produce the required paperwork in court, .....
They deliberately chose not to produce the Deed of Trust because for many years the courts have followed the precedent of not requiring it to be waved in the face of the judge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.