Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/24/2007 5:43:02 PM PST by Lovebloggers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Lovebloggers

If this guy was any dumber you’d have to water him.


2 posted on 11/24/2007 5:45:50 PM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers
Terrorists are ``just hoodlums and convicts,"

"And if we would stop convicting them, they wouldn't even be convicts! Once again, it's our fault!"

3 posted on 11/24/2007 5:46:41 PM PST by Larry Lucido (Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers

And women incite rapists by appearing outside without burkas.


4 posted on 11/24/2007 5:46:56 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; Petronski; Allegra; SJackson; George W. Bush; Extremely Extreme Extremist; traviskicks; ...
"No country is going to attack us!"

Did anybody catch the interview where he said this? Because I want to verify this. Because...wow.

That's just stunningly ignorant.

5 posted on 11/24/2007 5:49:18 PM PST by Ultra Sonic 007 (Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers

The most dangerous aspect, of course, is the notion that this is all just a ‘law enforcement’ issue.

It’s a war, Ron.

‘Peace in our time” is still a bad idea.


6 posted on 11/24/2007 5:49:42 PM PST by IncPen (The Liberal's Reward is Self Disgust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers
I can't recall any of them ... Pubbie or dhim ... offering their reaction on September 12, if they were the CIC.

We hear a lot now about how the effort has failed ... or we're done with our part .. or something like that ... but what would RP had done on 9/12 and following if he'd been CIC?

7 posted on 11/24/2007 5:51:00 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers

What the heck do some “conservatives” see in him???
He is scary stupid.


9 posted on 11/24/2007 5:51:18 PM PST by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers

Actually, I don’t disagree with his assesment, I’ve said the same myself, however, when you can kill hundres of innocents at one blow, does it really make any difference what their motivation is?


10 posted on 11/24/2007 5:53:49 PM PST by CaptRon (Pedicaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers

“Hoodlums and convicts”, my eye. Why do most on the left and even some on the right dismiss the terrorist threat so easily? Thousands of ruthless, ingenuous terrorists are desperately trying to murder Americans - why is this a concern that just doesn’t rate for so many people?

You can find flaws in George Bush’s handling of the war on terror, but at least he’s willing to wage it. He has been serious about it. The more solitary he becomes in this, the more I appreciate him.


12 posted on 11/24/2007 5:54:42 PM PST by Irish Rose (Will work for chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers
Message to Ron Paul from The Twins:

"We are getting aggravated."
"Yes, we are."

14 posted on 11/24/2007 5:55:45 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers

well, I think Paul is right. The only way to destroy the greatest nation on earth is to provoke us to destory ourselves. These thugs and criminals are incapable of doing it themselves.

And our foreign policy is not helping, supporting the Saudi criminals and Egyptian tyrants, plus, look at what is happening in Pakistan, 10 billion wasted to spread the military socialism and the money is spent against India and we expect terrorism to decrease? If I was a Pakistani citizen I would be upset over the support of the United States, financially and politically, to the criminal Musharaf who has thrown thousands of citizens and journalists and opposition leaders in jail and runs a socialistic military junta which is invested in most sectors of the economy with government imposed monopolies.

So, I think Paul is not so far off in his comments, in fact, I think he is correct.


18 posted on 11/24/2007 5:59:09 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers

The Paulites were out on threads earlier.

When the far left and fascist anti semites both suppport him as his anti war, anti Jewish, and 9/11 truthers (the gov. did it)propaganda fills his support sites.

Also L Ron Paul said he probably would not support the Republican nominee so:

Why are the L Ron Paul supporters allowed on Free Republic as they make Rudy seem like a pure conservative Republican.


20 posted on 11/24/2007 6:01:52 PM PST by SoCalPol (Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers
Terrorists are ``just hoodlums and convicts,"

Right. ...religious fanatics that hijack airlines and fly them into buildings and are dedicated to killing as many "infidels" as possible are essentially the same as small-time criminals who hold up liquor stores and sell crack on street corner? No difference at all, right RP? "..but we incite them with our foreign policy,"

No, we our very existence incites them. ...as does the existence of all non-Muslims. This whole blame America first crap is getting real old.

21 posted on 11/24/2007 6:01:56 PM PST by Mr. Mojo (“Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors and miss.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers
Terrorists are ``just hoodlums and convicts,"

Right. ...religious fanatics that hijack airlines and fly them into buildings and are dedicated to killing as many "infidels" as possible are essentially the same as small-time criminals who hold up liquor stores and sell crack on street corner? No difference at all, right RP?

"..but we incite them with our foreign policy,"

No, we our very existence incites them. ...as does the existence of all non-Muslims. This whole blame America first crap is getting real old.

22 posted on 11/24/2007 6:02:11 PM PST by Mr. Mojo (“Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors and miss.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers

The Doolittle Raid no doubt incited some Japanese.


23 posted on 11/24/2007 6:03:06 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers

Wow.


24 posted on 11/24/2007 6:04:09 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers
“... but we incite them with our foreign policy”

Well actually we “incite” them with out culture which is found all over the planet whether we like it or not. Our movies, music, capitalism and even elected government is an afront to their world view. Troops or no troops, foreign policy or no foreign policy all of these things that outrage these people would still be “threatening” their populations. Because it is the ideas, the information that is the threat. It subverts their women and children from the straight and narrow of their religion...

We are the "Great Satan" because we are the center of this cultural change towards freedom and person expression - for better and for worse.

So Paul is dead wrong. There will peace only if they succeed at stopping our culture from polluting their world or we stop them where they are before they get here to kill more of us.

26 posted on 11/24/2007 6:04:44 PM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers; All

28 posted on 11/24/2007 6:05:57 PM PST by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers
Where are all the Paulettes? Why are they not here to deny that he ever said this?

Oh Paulettes WHERE ARE YOU?

29 posted on 11/24/2007 6:06:06 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lovebloggers
>>
Terrorists are ``just hoodlums and convicts, so to speak, but we incite them with our foreign policy,’’ he said.
<<

Cong. Paul is also a physician, so he, like Dr. Howard Dean of the Democrat Party are not dumb. However, Cong/Dr. Paul’s comment is just ignorant and dangerous based on the facts of Jihadist ideology and this is exactly where I part company with the Libertarians that Paul is strongly connected to.

Jihadists do not live to enjoy voluntary exchange and the fruits of the division of labor. They do not seek to live in a non-coercive society. Indeed, **they reject such ideas** as ideas of the infidel, and would seek to use whatever force necessary to replace the free market, especially the free market in ideas, with the will of Ummah under Sharia.

Dr. Paul, and those who think like he does (that jihadists fight the west only because Bush invaded Iraq) ought to spend some time reading Osama bin Laden’s own words as to why he, and his supporters, struck the US on 9/11/2001. But he also ought to recall the words of the Marine hymn, “From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli...” because this is a direct reference to the US attack on the Barbary Pirates, who were jihadist Muslims who were attacking and enslaving our sailors in the late 1700’s.

Indeed, we are now seeing stunning scholarship about the millions of Africans and Europeans who were enslaved by Muslims and who still practice slavery.

The future course is clear: the world is on a collision course. Some future battle will settle humanity’s biggest question: will Islam be successfully resisted by the non-Islamic nations?

This is not a liberty issue. This is a fundamental battle against an ideology that insists on forcing every non-believer to answer the Three Demands: convert, submit, or die. Mere “hoodlums and convicts” do not make such demands. The only person who is qualified to be President until this matter is settled, will be one who understands how serious this conflict really is.

see:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1654140/posts

31 posted on 11/24/2007 6:08:40 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson