1 posted on
11/24/2007 11:28:49 AM PST by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: SunkenCiv
GGG Ping.
Our first posting of this article was pulled by JimRob for a copyright complaint...I think it was The Independent
2 posted on
11/24/2007 11:30:32 AM PST by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
If Europeans were first in the area now known as Mexico City, it’s time for the Mexicans to go back to where they came from.
We have a predicament.
3 posted on
11/24/2007 11:33:28 AM PST by
toddlintown
(Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: blam
Does skull prove that the first Americans came from Europe?"Scientists in Britain have identified the oldest skeleton ever found" proves only that it's the oldest skeleton FOUND. But interesting article, none the less.
5 posted on
11/24/2007 11:40:11 AM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: blam
This story is rich for making fun of the aztlan/reconquista folks.
6 posted on
11/24/2007 11:50:38 AM PST by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: blam
7 posted on
11/24/2007 11:53:25 AM PST by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: blam
lol, I mentioned this to a latino aquaintenance, they went balistic. the thought that white europeans predate american indians, what a hoot.
9 posted on
11/24/2007 11:55:42 AM PST by
television is just wrong
(deport all illegal aliens NOW. Put all AMERICANS TO WORK FIRST. END Welfare)
To: blam
I demand reparations on behalf of my long lost cousins, who were the victims of genocide!
10 posted on
11/24/2007 11:57:33 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: blam
Thor Heyerdahl would not have been surprised.
11 posted on
11/24/2007 12:03:20 PM PST by
outofstyle
(My Ride's Here)
To: blam
That’s probably right,...making the arguement we were here first more useless.
12 posted on
11/24/2007 12:05:13 PM PST by
Rick_Michael
(The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
To: blam
Hmmmm....it's clear now that Mexicans are settlers on conquered land. Are their passports in order?
I expect they'll be teaching Euro languages in Mexicans schools...?
Doesn't this call for a RereConquest, and doesn't that make us REreConquistadores...?
Did they find an ancient solar leaf-blower along with the lass..?
14 posted on
11/24/2007 12:13:58 PM PST by
gaijin
To: blam
Primitive Mexican tribesmen celebrate bountiful harvest in ancient rite
16 posted on
11/24/2007 12:23:06 PM PST by
gaijin
To: blam
This is just racist, sexist, homophobia!
(/sarcasm)
21 posted on
11/24/2007 12:36:23 PM PST by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
To: blam
Well, other than having fun by infuriating the Reconquista Front, what's the point?
The land mass of the U.S. was essentially empty when the settlers arrived. The fact that a few million (or less) aboriginals eked out a primitive existence on the land prior to that is not relevant to the debate of "who owns the land". Those questions were settled by our ancestors, maybe not to the liking of everyone, but you can't please all the world.
To: blam
23 posted on
11/24/2007 12:45:41 PM PST by
Racehorse
(Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
To: blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
24 posted on
11/24/2007 12:56:50 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Sunday, November 18, 2007"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'"'https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: blam
Ha. I just told my half-Cherokee wife that we didn't take
her land. We took
our land
back.
25 posted on
11/24/2007 1:24:07 PM PST by
Viking2002
(Waterboarding the Left every chance I get.)
To: blam
Bookmarking with a giant smirk.
26 posted on
11/24/2007 1:40:33 PM PST by
JOAT
To: blam
Actually the "Clovis First" theory has a lot of credible challenges;
Were the Clovis people the first Americans?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clovis_culture
PBS did a great special on this subject as well:
Most notably, the new dates suggest that Clovis might not have come first.
Archeologists have previously dated other sites from non-Clovis early Americans, from Canada to South America http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7565568
27 posted on
11/24/2007 1:54:56 PM PST by
Kid Shelleen
(Aztlan My Azz: La Raza is Spanish for Tan Klan)
To: blam
29 posted on
11/24/2007 2:11:08 PM PST by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
To: blam
Analysis of skeletal remains has led to at least two models to explain the origin of early human populations in the Americas. a, It was originally thought that the first colonizers were the direct ancestors of present-day Native Americans, who arrived from northeast Asia and possibly central Asia in three successive migrations about 12,000 years ago. b, More recent analyses of the craniofacial features of skulls dating from the end of the Ice Age suggest that the first arrivals were from south Asia or the Pacific Rim. These 'Palaeoamericans' were thought to be unrelated to the majority of modern Amerindian remains a later group of colonizers from northeast Asia were thought to have given rise to these late-prehistoric populations. Now, González-José et al.5 have found that a group of early historic Amerindian skulls from the Baja peninsula in Mexico bear a strong resemblance to the early Palaeoamericans, suggesting that the colonization of the Americas was more complex than had previously been suspected.
31 posted on
11/24/2007 2:15:23 PM PST by
blam
(Secure the border and enforce the law)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson