Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Fred Dead or Just Resting?
Real Clear Politics ^ | 20 November 2007 | Tom Bevan

Posted on 11/20/2007 8:47:19 PM PST by Spiff


Is Fred Dead or Just Resting?

TOM BEVAN

In early October I argued there was a disconnect between the way the pundits and voters viewed Fred Thompson's candidacy. Sitting here six weeks later, however, evidence continues to pour in that Thompson has completely underwhelmed the Republican electorate.

It seems like every other day a new poll comes out in a key early state showing Fred losing ground - sometimes significant ground. Indeed, if you take a look at groups that have conducted at least two surveys since early September (when Thompson officially entered the race and began campaigning) the trend lines are unmistakable:

freddead.gif

Thompson is now running a distant fourth in Iowa, has almost dropped off the charts to sixth place in New Hampshire, is running in 3rd place in South Carolina about 4 points behind Romney and Giuliani, and has fallen well off the pace into 3rd in Florida.

The national polls aren't as important, but still reflect the same downward trend:

freddead2.gif

Thompson has shed seven and a half points in the RCP Average since he officially entered the race.

This is more than a candidate not being able to sustain a "bump." In fact, outside of the NRLC endorsement last week, it's hard to find any positive evidence for Thompson at the moment. To the contrary, backers of Thompson are now expressing doubts to the press.

So can Thompson turn it around? As we all know by now, anything is possible in politics. And, as is usually the case, it all starts with Iowa. With New Hampshire effectively off the table, Thompson's campaign cannot afford a poor showing in Iowa or it'll be on life support by the time South Carolina rolls around.

Indeed, Larry Kudlow reports in his column today that the Thompson folks are now focusing heavily on Iowa:

[Thompson's] campaign strategists told me they are pouring tons of money into Iowa advertising. They see a strong opportunity for a Thompson surge in the state, undermining Romney and inflicting damage on Giuliani.

Watch and see if the NRLC endorsement and increased spending in Iowa spark a turnaround for Thompson. At this point, it's his best (and perhaps only) hope of staying in the game long enough to score a win in South Carolina - a state no eventual Republican nominee for president has ever lost.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: doa; fredthompson; mitt; mittromney; naptime; romney; spacemanspiff; thinkfulwishing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-344 next last
To: Romneyfor President2008
Reminds me of people at Star Trek conventions who fight over Kirk or Picard. LOL

PICARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
281 posted on 11/21/2007 3:51:43 AM PST by ChocChipCookie (Homeschool like your kids' lives depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Thanks, fieldmarshal. Do you happen to have a link for his re-examination on that and/or when he re-canted?


282 posted on 11/21/2007 4:08:09 AM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Second place in the national polls is "demise" now, is it?

Your feisty, fantasy life is absurd. You candidate is a dud, and your denials are making a fool of yourself.

283 posted on 11/21/2007 4:16:34 AM PST by SergeiRachmaninov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

You’re welcome! I stole my tagline from another Freeper, so why not?


284 posted on 11/21/2007 4:30:46 AM PST by Fairview ( Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Spiff
People that don't support Fred don't "Hate" him. They just have different priorities than you happen to have. Winning being one of them.

All Spiff did was post an article that used poll numbers as facts (do you disagree with the facts stated in the article?), yet because they are not glowing towards Fred you spew hateful intentions to him.

Spiff has been great showing us charts showing trends, and just because he likes Mitt better doesn't mean his charts are wrong, or put out just to bring Fred down.

Yesterday, seeing Freepers rip Brit Hume of all people because he was having a political discussion regarding Fred falling in the polls was beyond comprehension. Sometimes I wonder if some of the Fred supporters wouldn't be happier if this website wasn't renamed Fred Republic. We are in the beginning of the GOP primary, and Fred can still pull it out, but just because someone expresses doubt that it can be done, does not mean the "hate" Fred, or if by some miracle does pull it out, that we won't all rally behind him at that time.

285 posted on 11/21/2007 4:32:49 AM PST by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Swordfished

My eyes are open, as are the eyes of 86% of Free Republic.

Interesting you make a Mormon jab though, since I have never said anything about Mitt’s relgion, nor do I care until he makes it an issue, if he ever does.


286 posted on 11/21/2007 4:33:07 AM PST by ejonesie22 (ROMNEY HOCKS! (hey, he's spent a lot of his own cash so far...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Romneyfor President2008

Interesting...


287 posted on 11/21/2007 4:36:24 AM PST by ejonesie22 (ROMNEY HOCKS! (hey, he's spent a lot of his own cash so far...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: codercpc
Sometimes I wonder if some of the Fred supporters wouldn't be happier if this website wasn't renamed Fred Republic

You're right... Try typing in the url fredrepublic.com, and see what happens.

lol

288 posted on 11/21/2007 4:40:48 AM PST by incindiary (Washington needs a doctor, not a lawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
That’s the problem right there. You’re as blind as a bat. You should wake up and smell the hairspray.

You know, I have never alerted on one individual poster before, and I am not going to start now, but I have read your posts over the years and agreed with most. Tonight your vitriol is over the top. I have been on this website as long as you have, so according to your "judge" criteria, I have as much right to speak as you do. YOU ARE RUDE. You are not helping your candidate at all.

I don't know if you "hit the bottle" in the middle of the night, or if you have just hit your boiling point, but if you want others to actually listen and be persuaded by your opinions tone it down. If instead, this is just your preferred posting style I won't bother to respond anymore, because frankly, you are just not worth it.

289 posted on 11/21/2007 5:17:47 AM PST by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: incindiary

Unbelievable!


290 posted on 11/21/2007 5:33:25 AM PST by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: pissant
So you whined your way back LOL
291 posted on 11/21/2007 6:56:50 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Go Mitt Go! Clinton ‘08!


292 posted on 11/21/2007 6:57:57 AM PST by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1928826/posts

293 posted on 11/21/2007 7:01:25 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie
Very good observations! Thank you for these well stated sentiments.

Good luck and God bless with your home-schooling!

294 posted on 11/21/2007 7:10:59 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Given the timing ofthe post, I think Mitt must have the living-in-mom’s-basement voters all wrapped up.


295 posted on 11/21/2007 7:19:10 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
A good analysis on your part. I don’t like how these primaries are sooner and closer together. I think it’s like making a hasty major purchase decision (somewhat).

I agree with you completely on this point. If I were in charge, the primaries wouldn't start until February, and only Iowa and New Hampshire would be allowed to have primaries in February. The other states would rotate starting positions beginning in March, and there would be no "super Tuesday" primaries. We'd get a chance to look at every candidate and see how he or she performed over the long campaign.

Bill

296 posted on 11/21/2007 7:24:30 AM PST by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
The dems put three horrible issues on the ballot in the last electin to get them to the polls (and they had the same two in NV and MO).

I'm afraid that they learned that trick from the 2004 election. I still wonder whether President Bush would have beaten Kerry if we hadn't had homosexual marriage on the ballot in eleven states (or however many it was). California had a controversy about school books recently. I think they were eliminating references to Christmas or something of that nature because a state judge ruled that these references violated the state constitution's separation clause. I've wondered if Republicans shouldn't get amendments on the 2008 ballots to say that school books can contain religious references. That kind of referendum might get our people to the polls again.

Bill

297 posted on 11/21/2007 7:28:28 AM PST by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Why is it so hard for a Congressman to get elected?

Several reasons. The primary one is that they serve a relatively small constituency, and so have no national, or even statewide, recognition. It also means that they only need appeal to a narrow segment to be elected, which often translates into lack of broader appeal needed to win nationally. Senators and Governors need to win approval on a statewide basis, and so tend to have more populist positions.

Senators tend to be centrist and Representatives tend to be more partisan to the Right or Left, depending on their district. The nature of the way the House conducts business tends to highlight this.

Then, there is the fact that there are 100 Senators and 50 Governors. Congressmen get lost in the crowd of 435. This means they have less influence on policy, and therefore less appeal to the money donors.

298 posted on 11/21/2007 7:44:46 AM PST by LexBaird (Behold, thou hast drinken of the Aide of Kool, and are lost unto Men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“I don’t know why anyone thought FT would be the big conservative savior. Maybe because he looks the part?”

Because many people really really wanted him to be. Don’t expect the “True Believers” to let go until there is no spark of life whatsoever in FDT campaign....and maybe not even then.


299 posted on 11/21/2007 7:58:59 AM PST by snarkybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Welcome back!


300 posted on 11/21/2007 8:05:37 AM PST by lesser_satan (READ MY LIPS: NO NEW RINOS | FRED THOMPSON - DUNCAN HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 341-344 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson