Skip to comments.
Tale of a Clinton 'target' (Kathleen Willey Takes Aim At Clinton's)
Washington Times ^
| Nov. 20, 2007
| By Andrew Richards
Posted on 11/20/2007 7:40:25 PM PST by jdm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
11/20/2007 7:40:26 PM PST
by
jdm
To: doug from upland
2
posted on
11/20/2007 7:40:50 PM PST
by
jdm
To: jdm
3
posted on
11/20/2007 7:42:40 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: jdm
The Clintons must be incredibly, pathetically unhappy.
4
posted on
11/20/2007 7:42:53 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(www.BulletBras.net)
To: jdm
5
posted on
11/20/2007 7:43:07 PM PST
by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: jdm
Barnes & Noble just called and said our new book by Kathleen Willey just came in. We are looking forward to reading it. We’ve been trying to get this book at Costco or Barnes & Noble, but neither store has stocked it.
6
posted on
11/20/2007 7:43:52 PM PST
by
Plains Drifter
(If guns kill people, wouldn't there be a lot of dead people at gun shows?)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
If she wanted to stay alive, she needed to go public in a huge way, so the spotlight wouldn’t allow BC and HC to get away with anything, should Kathleen’s car suddenly lose its breaks and she goes off a cliff somewhere.
Best thing she could do for self-preservation, to write the book and keep talking about the Perv and the Anabler to the Perv.
7
posted on
11/20/2007 7:44:56 PM PST
by
adopt4Christ
(The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.)
To: Plains Drifter
8
posted on
11/20/2007 7:47:40 PM PST
by
basil
(Support the Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
To: jdm
"Hillary Clinton wants everybody to believe that she's a champion for women's rights, a feminist, a woman's advocate," Mrs. Willey said. "She could not possibly be any of those if she continues to degrade and abuse woman like me." Roughly fifty percent of the nation will happily vote for this succubus. I don't get it.
9
posted on
11/20/2007 7:58:18 PM PST
by
stevem
To: stevem
Succubus? LOL. I haven’t heard that word in a long time.
10
posted on
11/20/2007 7:59:35 PM PST
by
jdm
To: jdm
I’m an old time Redneck. The Clintons are old time “White Trash”. I was raised up in a world where your word was your bond.
Hilary has finally landed among her own, in NooYawk, where being a lying piece of crap is a profitable occupation.
11
posted on
11/20/2007 8:00:51 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
This is the only safe place for her! If she doesn’t “hide” out in the open, killing her would be easier.
12
posted on
11/20/2007 8:01:06 PM PST
by
bannie
To: bannie
I think that is right. Besides, she needs to tell the truth because it is the truth.
13
posted on
11/20/2007 8:03:30 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Cobra64
Unhappy with their marriage and etc. but he probably is happy in his free and laid back life style, doing what ever and who ever he wants and she, happy to be wielding big money and big power. That’s all she stuck around for with the “loser” anyway, and now she has it. (almost)
14
posted on
11/20/2007 8:09:12 PM PST
by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: Cobra64
The Clintons must be incredibly, pathetically unhappy.You jest!
You obviously don't understand psychopaths...
15
posted on
11/20/2007 8:14:18 PM PST
by
Wil H
To: jdm
No apostrophe in “Clinton” as it is used in your title (unless she is taking aim at some part of the Former Boy President’s anatomy, which part, for reasons of decorum, you demurely decline to name).
16
posted on
11/20/2007 8:16:56 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
(Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
To: Steely Tom
some part of the Former Boy Presidents anatomy, which part, for reasons of decorum, you demurely decline to name I believe Slick named it "Willard."
17
posted on
11/20/2007 8:22:39 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: r9etb
I believe Slick named it "Willard." I had forgotten that. Didn't you love the '90's?
\sarc
18
posted on
11/20/2007 8:31:16 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
(Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
To: Cobra64
The Clintons must be incredibly, pathetically unhappy.
At least they have each other. That being the case, it saves screwing up two couples.
19
posted on
11/20/2007 8:39:13 PM PST
by
RobinOfKingston
(Man, that's stupid...even by congressional standards.)
To: stevem
20
posted on
11/20/2007 8:39:31 PM PST
by
BerryDingle
(Illegitimi Non Carborundum (Don't let the bastards wear you down))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson