**CNN's six "undecided voters" were all Democratic operatives**

UPDATES BELOW - CNN hits bottom and digs: All six debate questioners appear to be Democratic Party operatives. So much for "ordinary people, undecided voters". To paraphrase Junior Soprano, CNN is so far up the DNC's hind end, Howard Dean can taste hair gel.

In a nutshell, CNN's six "undecided voters" were:

A Democratic Party bigwig
An antiwar activist
A Union official
An Islamic leader
A Harry Reid staffer
A radical Chicano separatist

Wow. This looks "rather" like a scandal. Hot Air:

...You’d think the network’s audience might want to know who among the questioners has had a paid, formal relationship with the party.

...I went back to the beginning of the debate to see how Blitzer introduced the format. Did he offer any details on who’d be doing the questioning? Why, yes. After mentioning that the debate was sponsored by the national party — something likely understood by most viewers as a mere formality — he described them as “ordinary people, undecided voters.” Note: not even “undecided Democrats.” Just undecided.

Word on the street is that Hillary's staffers are extremely pleased with CNN's Wolf Blitzer for his softball questioning of Sen. Clinton during Thursday's Las Vegas debate. Blitzer "was outstanding, and did not gang up like Russert did in Philadelphia. He avoided personal attacks, remained professional and ran the best debate so far."

Who were the questioners upon whom Blitzer called? According to CNN, they were "ordinary people, undecided voters.” Like these folks:

Plant #1: LaShannon Spencer, whom Blitzer introduced as an "undecided voter", was tagged by Dan Riehl: in truth, she served as the political director of the Democratic Party of Arkansas.

Plant #2: Khalid Kahn, who expressed concern about profiling and the Patriot Act, asked "[m]y question is that -- our civil liberties have been taken away from us. What are you going to do to protect Americans from this kind of harassment?" Classical Values notes that Mr. Kahn is the president of the Islamic Society of Nevada, who has hosted conferences like this one (with guest speakers like Muzzamil Siddiqi). In fact, Kahn in no stranger to CNN, appearing on a show called Keeping the Faith in Sin City.

Plant #3: Suzanne Jackson -- mother of a three-term Iraq war veteran -- is aso a well-known antiwar activist. She appeared in the Las Vegas Review Journal protesting -- with a poor monkey, no less -- outside of Harry Reid's office in May.

Plant #4: Maria Luisa -- the UNLV student who asked Hillary Clinton whether she preferred "diamonds or pearls" -- wrote that CNN forced her to ask the "frilly" question instead of a pre-approved query regarding the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste facility.

Update: Andy writes to point out the eerie similarities between Maria L. Parra-Sandoval and "Maria Luisa." Regarding Ms. Parra-Sandoval, the UNLV website states:

This spring she will serve as the political communications intern for Senator Harry Reid in Washington, D.C. Currently a junior at UNLV, Maria is... is an immigrant on a quest to become a United States citizen.

In other words, she's not even eligible to vote, unless the Democrats changed the rules when I wasn't looking.

The under- (or un-) reported aspect of this is the light it casts on the Democrats’ refusal to participate in a debate moderated by Fox News. The logical explanation is that all of the Dem candidates and CNN are in on the staging of MULTIPLE events. Despite the contrived intra-party dust-ups, they collectively are conspiring to make Dems appear more favorable than Repubs.

Fox apparently doesn’t let the DNC control the agenda for the events, and the candidates might actually have to answer some REAL questions. Couldn’t have that, could we?

To: maineman

“This is NOT news. The folks asking questons are “undecided voters”...meaning they are undecided on which democrat to vote for.”
Thank you. These are undecided democrats. These are the people that are represented by the Democrat party. I don’t see why people here are shocked to see that those who are undecided about who to vote for in the Democratic primary are actually democrats. BFD.

Because it just isn’t that interesting that the undecided Democratic primary voters are actually Democrats. Don’t see a story here.

I don't think anyone here is shocked by this. No more than when Captain Renault said: I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here! ...

Just exposing another tactic of the Liberals to the light of truth.

Maybe you missed the lie that CNN was going to have a fair debate.

Poofter Anderson Cooper is going to moderate the next one. They wouldn't let him do this one because they knew he would all ga-ga over Edwards' hair.

Watch for hard questions (fed to Cooper by the Clinton/Liberal machine.)

If it's not a story to you that's fine. Thanks for the bump!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Saturday, November 17, 2007

CNN's six "undecided voters" were all Democratic operatives