Skip to comments.
Wolf Blitzer Is No Tim Russert: CNN Waves White Flag For Hillary (essential reading)
Post Chronicle ^
| Nov. 18, 2007
| by Roger Aronoff
Posted on 11/18/2007 6:46:18 AM PST by jdm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
1
posted on
11/18/2007 6:46:21 AM PST
by
jdm
To: jdm
And, don’t forget that the questions from the audience were p.l.a.n.t.e.d...
2
posted on
11/18/2007 6:50:34 AM PST
by
xtinct
(I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
To: jdm
3
posted on
11/18/2007 6:54:29 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: jdm
The CNN/Blitzer/LV Dem debate had one purpose: To rehabilitate Clinton’s candidacy.
It did that.
It put behind her flubs from the previous debate.
4
posted on
11/18/2007 6:59:10 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Dante3
“blitzer is a clown.”
he is also a presumptuous, pseudo-intellectual democrat who considers himself way up there.
5
posted on
11/18/2007 6:59:18 AM PST
by
ripley
To: jdm
the clinton news network conducted a pep rally not a debate for the piaps.....the useful idiot wolf blitzer probably had brown stains in his underwear in fear of saying something wrong against the piaps!!!
To: jdm
So what's new?
This has always been the standard MO for CNN toward the Clintons. They did it all thru the 90's.
7
posted on
11/18/2007 7:04:52 AM PST
by
what's up
To: TomGuy
While she did better, she still did not do well no matter how much the TH spin that she “won” and “did well.” She did not come across well and Biden, who has little if any chance to win, won the debate and made her look stiff and shrill and insincere.
8
posted on
11/18/2007 7:07:10 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: jdm
In the 90s, CNN was the Clinton News Network. Nothing has changed...
9
posted on
11/18/2007 7:07:16 AM PST
by
tips up
To: tips up
If they decide to hold a Republican debate, every candidate should say “NO” and use this debate as the reason.
10
posted on
11/18/2007 7:12:18 AM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Hunter Thompson in 08.)
To: jdm
White Flag? (Expletive deleted) CNN had Clinton operatives reading fake questions from the “audience” and Chicken Blitzer not asking ANY questions of Hillary!
11
posted on
11/18/2007 7:14:54 AM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(“If a tax cut increases government revenues, you haven’t cut taxes enough.” –Milton Friedman)
To: jdm
Simple solution. Edwards and Obama need to agree to do a Fox debate where everyone will be treated equally.
12
posted on
11/18/2007 7:25:23 AM PST
by
normy
(Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.)
To: xtinct
I wonder who draws up the pre-planned questions from the Hilary campaign? Sounds like the “Diamonds or Pearls” question was written by the same person that wrote the one for the person that asked Bill Clinton, “boxers or briefs”.
To: Blue Highway
according to previous articles on here —> CNN made up the pre-planned questions... shrug!!!
14
posted on
11/18/2007 7:46:36 AM PST
by
xtinct
(I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
To: xtinct
“And, dont forget that the questions from the audience were p.l.a.n.t.e.d...”
And don’t forget that the people who asked the questions were p.l.a.n.t.e.d.! No UNDECIDED or INDEMENDENT voters for the CLINTON NEWS NETWORK!
To: xtinct
And, dont forget that the questions from the audience were p.l.a.n.t.e.d... Which is not getting ANY airtime in the DBM!
16
posted on
11/18/2007 7:55:14 AM PST
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: xtinct
Not exactly love in bloom.
17
posted on
11/18/2007 8:09:19 AM PST
by
Liz
(Rooty's not getting my guns or the name of my hairdresser.)
To: jdm
I'm not quite sure, but isn't there a Republican candidates' debate on CNN this coming week?
Is Wolf Bluster going to be the interrogator again?
If so, watch him turn from a lamb into a lion for this event.
Leni
18
posted on
11/18/2007 8:13:42 AM PST
by
MinuteGal
(Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !!!)
To: jdm
Hillary doesn’t have to worry about Edwards or Osama because both will be fighting over who she will ask to be the vice president.
To: jdm
To Obama’s credit his position is not ‘nuanced’ (wrong as it may be). His position was Yes he supports them as part of an overall strategy. He did not speak it well but it was clear..
20
posted on
11/18/2007 8:15:14 AM PST
by
N3WBI3
(Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson