Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Understanding Social Conservatives
Capitol Hill ^ | Nov 17, 07 | JB Williams

Posted on 11/17/2007 9:10:19 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican

Because the religious right is the most visible champion of social conservative values today, and the secular socialists have worked so hard to make sure that social conservatism is defined as some right-wing religious extremism, it is in vogue to refer to social conservatives as some mutant breed of social Nazis.

(snip)

However, in reality, social conservatism actually has little to do with religion. In fact, until recent years, when the Democratic Party became run by Democratic Secular Socialists, it wasn’t even an idea limited to the right or Republicans. It was a very fundamental American precept shared by most Americans on all sides of the political spectrum. It was simply about individual responsibility and accountability, always inherent with individual right’s.

Is it just a right-wing effort to legislate morality?

(Excerpt) Read more at capitolhillcoffeehouse.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaigns; moralabsolutes; prolife; rudy; secularism; socialconservatives; socons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
This speaks for me!
1 posted on 11/17/2007 9:10:20 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican; TitansAFC; Mr. Silverback; Jim Robinson
"So, most social conservatives support life rather than death, because it is a fundamental American precept. If one does not respect and protect the sanctity of life, what other unalienable rights can they possibly be trusted to protect and preserve?"

PING!!! ;)

2 posted on 11/17/2007 9:16:18 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

Anything or anyone that reflects AMERICAN CORE VALUES, especially CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES is a “zazi thing”, “an extremist element”, to the Marxist socialists trying to take over America and crush individual freedoms. At least that is how they want their radical fringe voting mob to see it, along with how they want THE MSM TO PRINT IT.


3 posted on 11/17/2007 9:19:07 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Can’t believe I forgot to PING you to this one! ;)


4 posted on 11/17/2007 9:20:24 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!" -- Jim Robinson, 09/30/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

“However, in reality, social conservatism actually has little to do with religion.”

That’s kind of a lie.


5 posted on 11/17/2007 9:22:05 AM PST by Grunthor (Liberals need to be reminded that The Holy Bible is more than just God’s opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

I always thought the term ‘conservative’ was not very good.

We should just call ourselves ‘the normals’.


6 posted on 11/17/2007 9:23:27 AM PST by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"If one does not respect and protect the sanctity of life, what other unalienable rights can they possibly be trusted to protect and preserve?"

If one does not respect and protect the sanctity of self-determination and personal choice, how can they be trusted to protect and preserve life?

Right to Free Speech -- Freedom to Keep Views Private
Right to Keep and Bear Arms -- Freedom to Go Unarmed
Right to Worship -- Freedom from Compulsion of Worship
Right to Life -- Freedom to Choose to Die

7 posted on 11/17/2007 9:25:15 AM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

Great article. By trying to label social conservatives as right-wing religious fanatics, liberals hide the fact that social conservatives base their views, not just upon their religious values, but on logic.

One thing JB points out “America is built upon a belief in individual rights, not special rights for individual minority voting blocs. America is nothing more than a vast collection of minority blocs, none of which have more power than the other, or at least they aren’t supposed to have,” is exceedingly important. This is why multiculturalism as defined by separatist ethnic assistance groups-turned-lobbyists should not receive federal funding.


8 posted on 11/17/2007 9:28:37 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
We've gotten so far off base from what conservatism really means. It isn't about religion - it's about what our founding fathers envisioned for this "New World" they sought to create. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.......not the guarantee of happiness.

We are in dire need of a leader to take us back to these principles.

9 posted on 11/17/2007 9:38:59 AM PST by alicewonders (Duncan Hunter needs to be our next Sec. of Defense, Dir. of Homeland Security - or Vice President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Exactly!


10 posted on 11/17/2007 9:48:02 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

How?


11 posted on 11/17/2007 9:48:38 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


12 posted on 11/17/2007 9:48:51 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

I like “Americans”...


13 posted on 11/17/2007 9:49:11 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


14 posted on 11/17/2007 9:49:44 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

When one takes the life of another, how can it be defined as “self-determination?”


15 posted on 11/17/2007 9:50:10 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

I’d say “Amen” except that would be religious expression and some who believe in “freedom from religious expression” would be offended... LOL

I saw one secular socialist troll here already...


16 posted on 11/17/2007 9:52:37 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

Tribute to a conservative: Pissant

17 posted on 11/17/2007 9:52:59 AM PST by ElPatriota (Duncan Hunter 08 & Let's not forget, we are all still friends, basically :) despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: alicewonders

You bet!


18 posted on 11/17/2007 9:53:18 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Certainly no one can stop you from killing yourself. What social conservatives object to is the wish of many in the Right to Die movement to corrupt the medical establishment in order to commit suicide more comfortably.

Most of us don’t want to visit a hospital, or have friends and family visit a hospital, and wonder if some doctor or nurse might think we’re better off dead.

Kill yourself? Sure. I don’t think it’s right, but I can’t stop you. But I will oppose efforts to turn the health industry into a death industry.


19 posted on 11/17/2007 9:54:41 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Gondring: “If one does not respect and protect the sanctity of self-determination and personal choice, how can they be trusted to protect and preserve life?”

Gon, please explain of what use “self-determination and personal choice” is to someone who doesn’t have life.

Obviously — duh — life must be protected first, or any other right, determination, or choice is irrelevant.


20 posted on 11/17/2007 9:56:12 AM PST by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson