Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Gentlemen of the jury, have you reached a verdict?

1 posted on 11/16/2007 3:54:36 AM PST by Loyalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Loyalist

Special education teacher, huh?


2 posted on 11/16/2007 3:56:43 AM PST by ovrtaxt (You're a destiny that God wrapped a body around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

Not the best picture. Perhaps if the content of the sexually “explicit” conversations were made available , a decision could be reached. /s


3 posted on 11/16/2007 3:59:53 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

She looks innocent, but I would need a better picture to be sure ...


4 posted on 11/16/2007 4:02:36 AM PST by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

Well on RatemyTeachers.ca she only got a 3.8 out of 5 for “Average Easiness”. (Many did describe her as “beautiful” though.)

http://www.ratemyteachers.ca/schools/ontario/brampton/notre_dame___secondary_school/dina__calautti


5 posted on 11/16/2007 4:07:38 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

There really is an epidemic of women teachers abusing teens and subteens for their(the teacher’s) sexual gratification. A teacher is an authority figure. When is the NEA going to come out with some kind of statement or program against this kind of activity?

Women’s libbers railed against the abuse of power by men over women, and now women are showing they can abuse their power as well. Where is the outrage by the feminists?

And lastly, any comments on why this is a current epidemic?
Why are these women doing this to their students? Is it a power thing? Is this more common now, than before? Or perhaps, more known now because people are revealing these activities and prosecuting?

Although there have always been these kinds of liasions, it is amazing to me the high number of teacher student liasions, where the situation is fraught with the possibility of a leak of confidentiality and the loss to the teacher of their professional accreditation that they worked for. This is very dangerous behavior just on the professional level, let alone the moral and ethical ;evels for a teacher.

Why take the chance? I don’t understand this kind of behavior, outside of base human desires. I wonder if there is another dimension to this.


6 posted on 11/16/2007 4:10:15 AM PST by exit82 (I believe Juanita--Hillary enabled Juanita's rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

more evidence is required, but I’m feeling lenient based on the pic.


7 posted on 11/16/2007 4:12:09 AM PST by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Has anyone else noticed something here...

People scream bloody murder over the religious leader sexual abuse of young boys (i.e. homosexual, though that word is NEVER used in the media), primarily in the Catholic Church (though it’s happened in other religions as well). Now don’t get me wrong. This sort of thing is evil, and the harm it causes the child is devastating.

However...

Does anyone else notice that for the most part, the media is silent on the sexual abuse of children by public school teachers?

It seems to me that this sort of thing is far more prevalent than what we hear about with the Church.

Could it simply be that the media is more protective towards public school teachers, who tend to be union members, and be liberal, usually with the same political agenda as the media?

Mark


8 posted on 11/16/2007 4:13:36 AM PST by MarkL (Listen, Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

BS a 16 year old male cannot be assaulted by a female. At 16 he is looking for as many and as much as he can find.


9 posted on 11/16/2007 4:21:27 AM PST by YOUGOTIT (The Greatest Threat to our Security is the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

not bad, I wouldn’t throw it out of bed. not for a while anyway..


10 posted on 11/16/2007 4:30:20 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

Probable cause


11 posted on 11/16/2007 4:49:49 AM PST by JRios1968 (Faith is not believing that God can. It is knowing that God will. - Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist
She makes everything interesting to learn about."

I'm sure she does

12 posted on 11/16/2007 4:55:16 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist
Well,according to this article,I'm not so sure anything took place.

http://www.thestar.com/News/article/277016

13 posted on 11/16/2007 5:06:43 AM PST by quack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist
A Brampton high school student is outraged with Peel police for charging his teacher with allegedly committing sex-related offences against him, insisting all she did was help him get over an emotional breakup with his girlfriend.

The 16-year-old teen yesterday denied having any sexual or romantic relationship with his 35-year-old teacher but admitted he sought advice from her during online MSN Internet chats after his girlfriend dumped him.

"She did nothing wrong. She helped me get over my ex-girlfriend," said the Grade 11 student, who can't be named. "She did nothing to me. All we did was talk. Our conversations weren't sexually explicit.

"She never touched me. Police have taken this way, way too far. When they told me she was going to be charged, I was speechless."

From here.

Overreaction??????

14 posted on 11/16/2007 5:08:44 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

not guilty


15 posted on 11/16/2007 5:10:57 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

I would have to see THE WHOLE BODY OF EVIDENCE before rendering the decision........


18 posted on 11/16/2007 5:24:58 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist
Gentlemen of the jury, have you reached a verdict?

Not sure yet, but this could end up in a hung jury.
25 posted on 11/16/2007 6:21:49 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stylecouncilor

I say guilty.


33 posted on 11/16/2007 9:47:39 AM PST by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist

GUILTY!!! Looks like a young Fred Thompson in drag . . . .


34 posted on 11/16/2007 9:52:55 AM PST by King of Florida (A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trusts either of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Loyalist; jasoncann
New graphic for you

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

37 posted on 11/22/2007 7:52:32 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson