Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Groups assail governor on guns
SacBee ^ | 12 NOV 2007 | Jim Sanders

Posted on 11/12/2007 10:23:41 AM PST by radar101

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a quick-trigger, guns-a-blazing action hero in Hollywood, is being blasted by firearms groups as a Second Amendment wimp in the Capitol.

Schwarzenegger's signing of bills to require microstamping of semiautomatic pistols and to ban lead bullets in condor country has prompted gun groups to paint him as one of the state's most anti-gun Republican governors.

"Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger might as well change his last name to Kennedy because he is acting just like radical, anti-gun U.S. Sen. Ted Kennedy, his uncle-in-law," read a recent statement by Gun Owners of California, a nonprofit advocacy group.

"We don't believe he has a very clear understanding of the Second Amendment and what it means to protect the right to keep and bear arms," executive director Sam Paredes added in an interview. "We're very disappointed in his decisions."

Others dismiss such criticism as grossly unfair

"I think a lot of the extremely right-wing Republicans, who won't even vote against outlawing assault weapons, they're going to be upset with him," said Sen. Jack Scott, D-Altadena, who has had gun bills signed and vetoed. "To me, he's just a reasonable person on the issue."

No one who is qualified to buy guns will be prevented from doing so by the microstamping or condor bills, Scott noted.

Aaron McLear, Schwarzenegger's spokesman, described the governor as "largely a centrist" on gun bills who evaluates each on merit, not politics.

"He's not a leader who simply kowtows to a particular constituency," McLear said. "He does what's best for California."

Schwarzenegger, in the past four years, has restricted sale and ownership of the .50-caliber BMG rifle, outlawed the firing of a BB gun in a "grossly negligent" manner, and removed a statutory disincentive for ammunition sellers to check the age of young buyers.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; ca; california; callegislation; girlyman; guns; jackscott; microstamping; schwarzenegger; secondamendment

1 posted on 11/12/2007 10:23:41 AM PST by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radar101

His wife is in control.


2 posted on 11/12/2007 10:24:30 AM PST by bmwcyle (BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

>>”We don’t believe he has a very clear understanding of the Second Amendment and what it means to protect the right to keep and bear arms,” executive director Sam Paredes added in an interview.

Schwartzenkennedy wants to change the rules so he can become President.


3 posted on 11/12/2007 10:26:03 AM PST by Psychic Dice (ArtOfPsychicDice.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I think that Governor Arnold Kennedy should never have signed the microstamping bill, despite what his wife told him to do.


4 posted on 11/12/2007 10:38:54 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

This “microstamping” issue doesn’t make me question his ideology so much as his intelligence. He’s dumb if he thinks this will in any way contribute to solving crimes (any more than the old law of recording handgun ammunition purchases did), and he’s dumb if he doesn’t understand that it’s merely a law to impose higher overhead cost to companies that want to sell their products in California.


5 posted on 11/12/2007 10:48:11 AM PST by VR-21 (Leftists justify their existance by kicking their own country in the teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

I think a lot of the extremely right-wing Republicans, who won’t even vote against outlawing assault weapons, they’re going to be upset with him,” said Sen. Jack Scott, ...

Oh? And what “assualt weapons would those be?”

Can’t say I’ve ever seen many outside of the force.


6 posted on 11/12/2007 11:18:23 AM PST by bill1952 ("all that we do is done with an eye towards something else." - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
"... "We don't believe he has a very clear understanding of the Second Amendment and what it means to protect the right to keep and bear arms," executive director Sam Paredes added in an interview. "We're very disappointed in his decisions."

Wait a minute.

I am not defending Governor Schwarzenegger on signing the CA Microstamping and 'Lead-Free' ammo bills, but to those in the know, Sam Paredes of 'Gun Owners of California' is probably most to blame in regards to the behind the scenes workings of how the bills came to be signed.

What happened was that Paredes had a personal vendetta against a CA Dept of Fish & Game administrator who had been a relatively good friend to the issue of RKBA and decided to lobby the Governor to remove him from his job. Paredes finally managed to get his way and when it came time for the Governor's staff to round up 'Yea-or-Nay' testimony over the two bills in question, the soon-to-be fired administrator spitefully fired back at 'Gun Owners of California' and chose not to support opposition to their signing.

'Gun Owners of California' are not your friends, California shooters. Those schmucks are responsible for more anti-gun legislation being passed than they've defeated.

7 posted on 11/12/2007 11:22:19 AM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The KG9 Kid

Yep. Read about it on www.calguns.net
CRPA often makes things worse rather than better.


8 posted on 11/12/2007 11:57:09 AM PST by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Sen. Jack Scott, D-Altadena, who has had gun bills signed and vetoed. "To me, he's just a reasonable person on the issue."

This coming from someone who is NOT a reasonable person on the issue.

CA State Senator Jack Scott (D, Pasadena) says he'd be "PLEASED" to see guns confiscated from homes

9 posted on 11/12/2007 12:06:58 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Oh, he’s the one they voted for because he could win. Sound familiar?


10 posted on 11/12/2007 12:13:03 PM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
His wife is in control.

He turned out to be the ultimate girly man.

11 posted on 11/12/2007 12:25:01 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

She most likely will divorce him and she has all the pictures. He is frighten.


12 posted on 11/12/2007 12:31:04 PM PST by bmwcyle (BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

I wonder where Maria keeps his testicles?


13 posted on 11/12/2007 7:14:32 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: radar101
"I think a lot of the extremely right-wing Republicans, who won't even vote against outlawing assault weapons, they're going to be upset with him," said Sen. Jack Scott, D-Altadena

I suspect Sen. Scott's definition of an "assault weapon" is .....

...any firearm.

14 posted on 11/12/2007 7:17:40 PM PST by Mr. Mojo (“Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors and miss.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson