Posted on 11/05/2007 5:59:52 PM PST by laurenmarlowe
“We do indeed, in all its forms. What about it?’
Just needed a clarification. I couldn’t remember what it was.
See #28 for the rest of the story!
Hey, how are you tonite?
Are you working?
Hmmm... if a kid’s getting one in AIT, he’s a screw-up. If he gets one afterwards, it can actually be a compliment: the powers-that-be think you’re salvageable, and are just smacking your head back into adjustment before it gets REAL ugly.
Stacked too..
Some of the songs were something else.
Don’t ever get the “Monkey,dunky doo” trapped in your head.
Is hell exothermic or endothermic?
Theorem: Hell is exothermic.
Proof:
First, We postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell and at what rate are souls leaving? I think we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave.
Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls entering hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, then you will go to hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and souls go to hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell to increase exponentially.
Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant. Two options exist:
So which is it? If we accept the quote given to me by Theresa Manyan during Freshman year, "that it will be a cold night in hell before I sleep with you" and take into account the fact that I still have NOT succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then Option 2 cannot be true...
Thus, hell is exothermic.
Foster’s Brother...Cactus Tom Brooks was an Icon on local TV in Louisville.
Had a couple of shows..
*smooch*
Poor Baby!
What happened?
I taped 3 hours of Buster Keaton many years ago (from PBS). I still watch it from time to time.
He got his nickname from a family friend, Harry Houdini. After seeing little Master Keaton doing one of his pratfalls, Houdini said he was a real “buster”.
I have seen every single Marx Brothers movie in a movie house except for one.
Somehow, I have never been able to actually see “Coconuts”.
I think that it was Animal Crackers that was finally released more than 30 years ago that helped make my almost complete viewings possible.
Forty-four years after its original release, in June 1974, Animal Crackers was once again released in theaters. The film had been tied up in a copyright dispute since 1957, when Universal Pictures -- which owned all pre-1948 Paramount films -- renewed the copyright for the picture but neglected to renew the music rights or the rights to the original Broadway play. The 1974 re-release was big news at the time since the Marx Brothers were enjoying a resurgence in popularity among younger audiences. At the New York City re-release premiere, which Groucho attended, a riot broke out and he required police escort.
Can't argue with you there!
Evening Radix.
That kind of Marxist is ok..
Cold season is upon us.
Finally done with dinner!:)
Thank Lauren for this evenings thread! What a cute idea! *Hugs*
My favorite show which just happens to be funny to me
is “Monk”.
I think I relate to him! :D
Great thread, Lauren and a subject that all can “get into”!
?
?
?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.