--another tempest in a teapot, attracting the attention of the buffoons who write for newspapers and those who get elected to public office---
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: rellimpank
Maybe they hunt with bows? Spears (the ones with sharp points, not Britney)? Knifes?
2 posted on
10/31/2007 6:40:32 AM PDT by
fireforeffect
(A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
To: rellimpank
What’s a “Gun Hunting” license? or a “Gun Deer”.
3 posted on
10/31/2007 6:40:45 AM PDT by
RedStateRocker
(When the government fears the People= Liberty. When the People fear the Government =Tyranny)
To: rellimpank
Muzzle loaders are not covered under firearms law nor are bows or crossbows.
4 posted on
10/31/2007 6:41:25 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
To: rellimpank
Dozens of felons bought gun deer hunting licenses last year despite laws banning them from possessing firearms. Possession of a hunting license is not prima facie evidence that the possessor intends to hunt. Nor is it definitive evidence that he is in possession of a firearm. Consequently, the two activities -- owning a hunting license and being a felon -- are completely compatible under law and logic.
5 posted on
10/31/2007 6:42:19 AM PDT by
IronJack
(=)
To: rellimpank
How can I get in on this “Gun Huntin’ “, all these years I’ve been paying for mine and now I find out they roam the wilds...
6 posted on
10/31/2007 6:42:23 AM PDT by
NativeSon
(off the Rez without a pass...)
To: rellimpank
Yes, but how many felons register to vote democrat in Wisconsin?
7 posted on
10/31/2007 6:42:26 AM PDT by
VRWCmember
(Fred Thompson 2008! Taking America Back for Conservatives!)
To: rellimpank
How about arresting the felons?
Typical Wisconsin! Let’s make everybody else responsible for the actions of despots. Besides, has anyone actually proved that these felons used the hunting licenses with firearms? What if they went hunting with slingshots, stones or sticks?
How far should they take this? Should they investigate the people they ride in cars with? Should they investigate roomates? Should they make sure no one in a building has a firearm that they might patronize? I'm not advocating felon rights. I just don't think an additional burden should be placed on the public bacuase government can't do their job.
8 posted on
10/31/2007 6:42:37 AM PDT by
Tenacious 1
(No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
To: rellimpank
Unfortunately, it is a Republican pushing this. I see nothing wrong with a felon going hunting with a borrowed firearm. In fact, I'd like to see the Lifetime no-ownership of guns dropped completely, at least for first offenders. If you screw up once, you should be able to make restitution and regain all your citizenship rights, including gun ownership.
"Some" criminals actually "do" get "re-habilitated". Admittedly, the number is small, but it "does" happen.
9 posted on
10/31/2007 6:44:10 AM PDT by
Wonder Warthog
(The Hog of Steel-NRA)
To: rellimpank
If they are an adult trustworthy enough to be released from jail/prison, they are trustworthy enough to own a gun, in my opinion. If they are THAT likely to misuse it, then LOCK’EM UP!
11 posted on
10/31/2007 6:49:48 AM PDT by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: rellimpank
Considering that the government is trying to make us all felons, who cares? What type of felon? A violent criminal or someone whose wife during the divorce claimed he hit her to try to win custody of the kids?
14 posted on
10/31/2007 7:00:44 AM PDT by
CodeToad
To: rellimpank
Define felon (as in what crimes)
Define hunting license (for what, using what)
—
This sounds more like another subversive attempt at media shock and awe; attacking the second amendment in the name of security and public safety from behind a facade of legitimate concern and objectivity.
16 posted on
10/31/2007 7:10:48 AM PDT by
Red6
(Come and take it.)
To: rellimpank
Getting a deer permit is light years away from possessing a gun.
19 posted on
10/31/2007 7:30:23 AM PDT by
ought-six
("Give me liberty, or give me death!")
To: rellimpank
Demoncrats don't want felons to have guns but they do want them to get their right to vote restored...
To: rellimpank
Rep. Terry Musser (R-Black River Falls) said he will draft legislation requiring criminal background checks on firearm hunting license applicants. Just another convenient list of gun owners? No thanks Mr. Rino!
22 posted on
10/31/2007 7:57:23 AM PDT by
beltfed308
(Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
To: rellimpank
I thought that Wisconsin was one of the states that restores convicted felons their rights after they serve their time (at least for voting). What? You mean that guns aren’t part of the rights that were restored?
To: rellimpank
"Rep. Terry Musser (R-Black River Falls) said he will draft legislation requiring criminal background checks on firearm hunting license applicants."What for moron? You've already got your background check to buy guns. A gun doesn't come from a hunting license. This is just another bureaucratic money and time wasting hastle.
30 posted on
10/31/2007 8:52:29 AM PDT by
spunkets
("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
To: rellimpank
The actual number was likely higher because only one of every five Wisconsin hunters consented to release their names when applying for a license.These guys deserve to go back to prison for stupidity. Not only do they basically admit to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, they volunteer to release their names when they are not required to do so.
32 posted on
10/31/2007 9:23:53 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: rellimpank
Hmm. Wonder when they’ll start crosschecking IRS and Social Security data?
33 posted on
10/31/2007 9:24:07 AM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(No buy China!!)
To: rellimpank
Why is this stupid? Because a black powder weapon is completely unregulated and can be used during regular season.
37 posted on
10/31/2007 2:52:59 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(False modesty is as great a sin as false pride.)
To: rellimpank
OH NO!!! the word FELON they might rob the deer!
because the felon is actually doing something positive with a firearm this is a stupid restriction on a felon IF THEY WANTED A FIREARM THEY COULD GET ONE TO COMMIT A CRIME
use some EMPATHY felons hunting is the least of our worries
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson