Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Royal targeted in sex and drugs blackmail plot (UK royal family)
The Sunday Times ^ | October 28, 2007 | David Leppard

Posted on 10/28/2007 12:16:36 AM PDT by tlb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Plus there was the matter regarding Irene Adler.

To try to shake down people with a national security service at their beck and call you have to be very stupid or very certain of your evidence.

Prince Andrew, or Prince Edward ?

1 posted on 10/28/2007 12:16:37 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tlb

Dinsdale?


2 posted on 10/28/2007 12:19:55 AM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (Stop calling them "liberals," they're Bolsheviks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Exactly - more than a few people who have attempted to do so have ended up messily dead.


3 posted on 10/28/2007 12:20:40 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
"And now: a letter, a hotel registration book, and a series of photographs, which could add up to divorce, premature retirement, and possible criminal proceedings for a company director in Bromsgrove. He's a freemason, and a conservative M.P., so that's 3,000 pounds please Mr. S... thank you... to stop us from revealing: Your name, The name of the three other people involved, The youth organization to which they belonged, and The shop where you bought the equipment!"
4 posted on 10/28/2007 12:25:59 AM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (Stop calling them "liberals," they're Bolsheviks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
the meeting was arranged at the Hilton.

The Paris Hilton, I presume.

5 posted on 10/28/2007 12:28:30 AM PDT by JennysCool (Don't taze me, Bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist
"But right now, yes everyone is the moment you've all been waiting for; it's time for our Stop the Film spots! As you know, the rules are very simple. We have taken a film which contains compromising scenes and unpleasant details which could wreck a man's career. (gasp) But, the victim may 'phone me at any moment, and stop the film. But remember the money increases as the film goes on, so-o-o-o: the longer you leave it, the more you have to pay! Tonight, Stop the Film visits the little Thames-side village of Thames Ditton."
6 posted on 10/28/2007 12:29:22 AM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (Stop calling them "liberals," they're Bolsheviks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Prince Andrew, or Prince Edward ?

Prince Harry, Prince William or even Prince Phillip? I doubt Prince Charles simply because there has already been way too much about his sex life in the media.
7 posted on 10/28/2007 12:44:05 AM PDT by Talking_Mouse (O Lord, destroy Islam by converting the Muslims to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

England will soon have a king *AND* a queen in the same person... Hee Hee


8 posted on 10/28/2007 12:44:11 AM PDT by chadwimc (Proud to be an infidel ! Allah fubar !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I know that when the Brits talk about the ‘Royals’, they mean more than the Royal Family of Queen Elizabeth, Prince Phillip, their children and grandchildren. Possibly includes all of the descendants of Queen Victoria (a LOT of people) or all the way back to George I and all of his descendants?


9 posted on 10/28/2007 1:27:22 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (No Covenant with Death: Giuliani Shall Not Pass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I’d be more likely to think that Charley poo was bi.


10 posted on 10/28/2007 1:31:45 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I don’t know; but they didn’t say it was man/woman or woman/man.


11 posted on 10/28/2007 1:38:01 AM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

True.

But I’m not sure it would have been such a big deal . . . if it were hetero.

Besides, there’s been persistent rumors . . . of . . . such extracurricular activities, IIRC.

And it seems to me, that inexplicably, the younger generation is slightly healthier.


12 posted on 10/28/2007 1:47:46 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Talking_Mouse

Prince PHilip would probably be pleased if he could be on an “embarrassing” video. The man is 86 years old, with a heart condition.


13 posted on 10/28/2007 3:45:56 AM PDT by laconic (ence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Irene Adler? The A. Conan Doyle character in a blackmail plot? I doubt there is as much fiction here. I want to hear the other side of this story.


14 posted on 10/28/2007 4:36:02 AM PDT by bajabaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

A cruel man, but fair.


15 posted on 10/28/2007 4:42:31 AM PDT by Proud_texan (Just my opinion, no relationship to reality is expressed or implied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I vote for Andrew, there were lots of rumors about his behavior with his Navy pals even when he was married to Fergie.


16 posted on 10/28/2007 6:53:43 AM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
I know that when the Brits talk about the ‘Royals’, they mean more than the Royal Family of Queen Elizabeth, Prince Phillip, their children and grandchildren. Possibly includes all of the descendants of Queen Victoria (a LOT of people) or all the way back to George I and all of his descendants?

Why, then, there are millions of us. Actually, considering the sexual behavior of European "nobility" over the last thousand years I'd bet we are ALL Royals! LOL!

17 posted on 10/28/2007 7:13:50 AM PDT by Seruzawa (Attila the Hun... wasn't he a liberal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I was wondering what Fergie was up to these days. ;)


18 posted on 10/28/2007 7:23:32 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Oh my God! Lyndon LaRouche was right!!


19 posted on 10/28/2007 9:08:46 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju; Atlantic Bridge; Alberta's Child; fieldmarshaldj; LdSentinal; Norman Bates; JulieRNR21; ...

“Lyndon LaRouche was right!!”

He did say that the Queen of England was a drug trafficker. But I don’t think that Queen Elizabeth was in those tapes.


20 posted on 10/28/2007 4:21:35 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson