Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Royal targeted in sex and drugs blackmail plot (UK royal family)
The Sunday Times ^ | October 28, 2007 | David Leppard

Posted on 10/28/2007 12:16:36 AM PDT by tlb

A MEMBER of the royal family has been targeted in an alleged “sex and drugs” blackmail plot being investigated by Scotland Yard.

The royal - who cannot be named for legal reasons - called in the police after being approached by two alleged blackmailers in August.

The men demanded £50,000 not to publicise a video, which they suggested showed the royal engaged in a sex act. The case is understood to be the first time in more than 100 years that a member of the royal family has been the victim of blackmail.

During telephone calls to the royal’s office, the suspected blackmailers also claimed to have evidence suggesting that the royal had supplied an aide with an envelope containing cocaine. They claimed that they had a video tape showing the aide snorting the drug.

After the approach from the two men in August, the royal tipped off Scotland Yard. Detectives then set up an undercover operation to trap the suspects. On September 11, two men were arrested in a police sting at a London hotel. They were seized as they played what they claimed was the sex video in a suite at the Hilton hotel on Park Lane in Mayfair.

The men thought they were showing the film to a member of the royal’s staff. In fact, the man they met was an undercover detective from Scotland Yard’s kidnap and blackmail unit.

The Yard issued a statement yesterday saying: “Two men, a 30-year-old man and a 40-year-old man, appeared at City of Westminster magistrates’ court on September 13, each charged with one count of blackmail.”

Neither the royal nor any of the witnesses in the case can be identified after a judge issued a gagging order.

The alleged extortion attempt began on August 2 when a man telephoned the royal’s office. The caller identified himself only by his first name. He said he was aware that another man who worked on the royal’s staff had in his possession an envelope containing cocaine. The caller suggested the envelope was embossed with the royal’s personal insignia.

The caller then claimed he had a video tape that showed the royal aide giving someone oral sex. He indicated that the person was the royal. The caller asked for the royal to call him and left a mobile phone number.

During subsequent calls, one of the men claimed that the tapes showed a royal aide snorting cocaine. But the caller guaranteed that nobody would ever see them because they were safe in his flat. A Whitehall security official said: “He then said he wanted £50,000 from the royal for the tape.” The source said a senior legal adviser to the royal agreed with one of the men that he would see the tape before handing over the cash.

By this time a detective had been attached to the royal’s staff. He contacted the gang posing as a member of staff and the meeting was arranged at the Hilton. Parts of the video were shown and the meeting was secretly videoed by Scotland Yard detectives in an adjacent room. The two suspects were then arrested.

The official said the video also contained unsubstantiated allegations about other members of the royal family, including the Queen.

The case is the first in modern times that a member of the royal family has been targeted in an alleged blackmail plot. In 1891 the future Edward VII discussed with his solicitor paying off two prostitutes he had visited in return for letters he had written to them. Details emerged only in 2002 when the letters were sold for £8,220 at Bonhams, the auctioneers.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: blackmail; cocaine; fergie; greatbritain; montypython; royals; uk; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Plus there was the matter regarding Irene Adler.

To try to shake down people with a national security service at their beck and call you have to be very stupid or very certain of your evidence.

Prince Andrew, or Prince Edward ?

1 posted on 10/28/2007 12:16:37 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tlb

Dinsdale?


2 posted on 10/28/2007 12:19:55 AM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (Stop calling them "liberals," they're Bolsheviks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Exactly - more than a few people who have attempted to do so have ended up messily dead.


3 posted on 10/28/2007 12:20:40 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
"And now: a letter, a hotel registration book, and a series of photographs, which could add up to divorce, premature retirement, and possible criminal proceedings for a company director in Bromsgrove. He's a freemason, and a conservative M.P., so that's 3,000 pounds please Mr. S... thank you... to stop us from revealing: Your name, The name of the three other people involved, The youth organization to which they belonged, and The shop where you bought the equipment!"
4 posted on 10/28/2007 12:25:59 AM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (Stop calling them "liberals," they're Bolsheviks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
the meeting was arranged at the Hilton.

The Paris Hilton, I presume.

5 posted on 10/28/2007 12:28:30 AM PDT by JennysCool (Don't taze me, Bro!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist
"But right now, yes everyone is the moment you've all been waiting for; it's time for our Stop the Film spots! As you know, the rules are very simple. We have taken a film which contains compromising scenes and unpleasant details which could wreck a man's career. (gasp) But, the victim may 'phone me at any moment, and stop the film. But remember the money increases as the film goes on, so-o-o-o: the longer you leave it, the more you have to pay! Tonight, Stop the Film visits the little Thames-side village of Thames Ditton."
6 posted on 10/28/2007 12:29:22 AM PDT by oprahstheantichrist (Stop calling them "liberals," they're Bolsheviks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Prince Andrew, or Prince Edward ?

Prince Harry, Prince William or even Prince Phillip? I doubt Prince Charles simply because there has already been way too much about his sex life in the media.
7 posted on 10/28/2007 12:44:05 AM PDT by Talking_Mouse (O Lord, destroy Islam by converting the Muslims to Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

England will soon have a king *AND* a queen in the same person... Hee Hee


8 posted on 10/28/2007 12:44:11 AM PDT by chadwimc (Proud to be an infidel ! Allah fubar !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I know that when the Brits talk about the ‘Royals’, they mean more than the Royal Family of Queen Elizabeth, Prince Phillip, their children and grandchildren. Possibly includes all of the descendants of Queen Victoria (a LOT of people) or all the way back to George I and all of his descendants?


9 posted on 10/28/2007 1:27:22 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (No Covenant with Death: Giuliani Shall Not Pass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I’d be more likely to think that Charley poo was bi.


10 posted on 10/28/2007 1:31:45 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I don’t know; but they didn’t say it was man/woman or woman/man.


11 posted on 10/28/2007 1:38:01 AM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

True.

But I’m not sure it would have been such a big deal . . . if it were hetero.

Besides, there’s been persistent rumors . . . of . . . such extracurricular activities, IIRC.

And it seems to me, that inexplicably, the younger generation is slightly healthier.


12 posted on 10/28/2007 1:47:46 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Talking_Mouse

Prince PHilip would probably be pleased if he could be on an “embarrassing” video. The man is 86 years old, with a heart condition.


13 posted on 10/28/2007 3:45:56 AM PDT by laconic (ence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Irene Adler? The A. Conan Doyle character in a blackmail plot? I doubt there is as much fiction here. I want to hear the other side of this story.


14 posted on 10/28/2007 4:36:02 AM PDT by bajabaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

A cruel man, but fair.


15 posted on 10/28/2007 4:42:31 AM PDT by Proud_texan (Just my opinion, no relationship to reality is expressed or implied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I vote for Andrew, there were lots of rumors about his behavior with his Navy pals even when he was married to Fergie.


16 posted on 10/28/2007 6:53:43 AM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
I know that when the Brits talk about the ‘Royals’, they mean more than the Royal Family of Queen Elizabeth, Prince Phillip, their children and grandchildren. Possibly includes all of the descendants of Queen Victoria (a LOT of people) or all the way back to George I and all of his descendants?

Why, then, there are millions of us. Actually, considering the sexual behavior of European "nobility" over the last thousand years I'd bet we are ALL Royals! LOL!

17 posted on 10/28/2007 7:13:50 AM PDT by Seruzawa (Attila the Hun... wasn't he a liberal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I was wondering what Fergie was up to these days. ;)


18 posted on 10/28/2007 7:23:32 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Oh my God! Lyndon LaRouche was right!!


19 posted on 10/28/2007 9:08:46 AM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju; Atlantic Bridge; Alberta's Child; fieldmarshaldj; LdSentinal; Norman Bates; JulieRNR21; ...

“Lyndon LaRouche was right!!”

He did say that the Queen of England was a drug trafficker. But I don’t think that Queen Elizabeth was in those tapes.


20 posted on 10/28/2007 4:21:35 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson