Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Berkeley council takes no vote on cell-phone towers
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 10/24/7 | Carolyn Jones

Posted on 10/24/2007 7:57:40 AM PDT by SmithL

Berkeley -- Berkeley is home to some of the world's leading scientific, technological and telecommunications research, but good luck getting a cell phone connection there.

Coverage in the bustling college town has been notoriously spotty since the city imposed restrictions on cell-phone towers six years ago amid health and aesthetic concerns, phone users say.

Telecom giant Verizon recently filed a lawsuit in federal court to try and force the city to approve the towers, but little has changed.

The City Council on Tuesday night considered whether to approve five new antennas for Verizon and six new antennas for Nextel. But after a 90-minute public hearing, the council took no action - all five members abstained from deciding the matter.

City Manager Phil Kamlarz had recommended that the council overturn the city zoning board's denial of the permit and allow the antennas to be installed on the roof of the UC Storage building on Shattuck Avenue south of downtown.

The council is scheduled to take up the question again, and possibly take another vote, on Nov. 6.

Before the vote, the City Council met in closed session to discuss settling the Verizon case, which the city's outside attorneys are recommending it do. Other cities that have banned cell-phone towers have lost legal battles, and Berkeley stands to lose about $1 million in attorneys' fees if it loses. But no action was taken in that closed meeting.

"I don't think we have much choice (but to settle)," said City Councilwoman Betty Olds had said before the meetings. "I don't want the city to lose a million dollars. You've got to be realistic about these things."

Verizon sued Berkeley in August over the permit denials, saying that federal law prohibits cities from banning cell-phone towers on the basis of health or aesthetic concerns.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: beserkeley; canyouhearmenow
I love it.

The People's Republic of Berkeley SHOULD put its money where its mouth is. I hope that they stand their ground, even if it Bankrupts them. Especially if it bankrupts them!

1 posted on 10/24/2007 7:57:41 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Busniesses would be smarter to simply cease providing any service what-so-ever in such hostile areas.


2 posted on 10/24/2007 8:01:09 AM PDT by SampleMan (Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

How are they going to coördinate protests if they can’t use their cell phones?


3 posted on 10/24/2007 8:01:21 AM PDT by null and void (Franz Kafka would have killed himself in despair if he lived in the world we inhabit today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Exactly. I think they should ban all cell phone toowers in Berkely. Let the liberals taste the salt of their own tears.


4 posted on 10/24/2007 8:03:10 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
They pulled the same aesthetic reasoning in snooty neighboring Winter Park. The telecommunication companies put up towers resembling trees.
5 posted on 10/24/2007 8:03:15 AM PDT by poobear (Pure democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for dinner. God save the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The city of Berkeley wants their cell-phone towers to be placed near coffee plantations, to provide shade for the shade-grown coffee that they covet so much.


6 posted on 10/24/2007 8:03:35 AM PDT by Disambiguator (Political Correctness is criminal insanity writ large.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Cell tower:
7 posted on 10/24/2007 8:03:58 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Verizon does not have a case.


8 posted on 10/24/2007 8:06:47 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If they’re worried about aesthetics they should ban ugly feminists...oh...wait...then most of their citizens would have to leave town.


9 posted on 10/24/2007 8:08:25 AM PDT by RockinRight (The Council on Illuminated Foreign Masons told me to watch you from my black helicopter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Cell phone companies can place cell phone towers on boat masts offshore as well as on blimps above...both are areas where federal law prohibit city interference.

...but why?! Berkeley having crappy cell phone service serves the Berzerkers right. For that matter, electricity towers should come down there, too. Let them live by their own words. No towers.

No water towers. No electricity towers. No cell phone towers.

That’s how Berkeley should be.


10 posted on 10/24/2007 8:10:25 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto

Verizon routinely wins these suits.


11 posted on 10/24/2007 8:12:01 AM PDT by SmithL (I don't do Barf Alerts, you're old enough to read and decide for yourself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
the city imposed restrictions on cell-phone towers six years ago amid health and aesthetic concerns

"Health concerns"? But this is Berzerkley - their tinfoil hats will protect them.

12 posted on 10/24/2007 8:40:50 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Verizon should offer to make the towers look like giant dildos.


13 posted on 10/24/2007 9:22:43 AM PDT by MarineBrat (My wife and I took an AIDS vaccination that the Church offers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson