[AU72]

Taking advice of nuclear technology from M.ElBaradei is like having Madonna in charge of a school’s abstinence program.

[USS Alaska]

‘I can’t judge whether Iran intends to develop a nuclear bomb. It would need between three and eight years to do so. All intelligence services are agreed on that,’ said ElBaradei.

Just look at the contradiction in these two sentences. What an ass.

[Mr Apple]

"Iran would need ‘between three and eight years’ to develop an atomic bomb and constitutes no immediate danger"

See if the Israelis fall for this line of chit.

[Thermalseeker]

Iran would need ‘between three and eight years’ to develop an atomic bomb and constitutes no immediate danger

Unless, for incidence, Iran builds the components, then passes them off to a terrorist group. Iran might not ever assemble an operational bomb on their soil. Does that mean that we shouldn't stop them from passing the technology to others who would use it? The IAEA is clearly enabling these Iranian thugs.....

[Captain Rhino]

Of course, Mr. El Baradei would like us to wait until there is no doubt that Iran is a clear and present danger - say, until the day after they detonate their first nuclear weapon.

[CPOSharky]

Looks like Bagdad Bob found a writing job.

[ZULU]

When your first name is Mohamad, how could you POSSIBLY consider Iran a danger?

[Gay State Conservative]

No,they won’t be a clear and *present* danger until they deploy their first nuke....in about a year,eh mohammed? Somehow I doubt that Israel will wait until the 9th Century mullahs in Tehran become a *present*,as well as a *clear*,danger before they take action.

[reagan_fanatic]

Typical UN behavior - deny the problem even exists until Iran starts producing nuclear weapons and sharing the technology with terrorist elements around the globe, then issue condemnations and strongly-worded letters. That'll teach 'em who's boss.

It always worked in the past, right?