Skip to comments.
City Hikes Boy Scouts' Rent by $199,999 over Gay Ban (Philadelphia)
Philadelphia Inquirer ^
| 10/18/2007
| Joseph A. Slobodzian
Posted on 10/18/2007 9:41:25 AM PDT by Pyro7480
The Boy Scouts of America's refusal to bend its rules to permit gay scouts will cost the organization's local chapter $200,000 a year if it wishes to keep its headquarters in a city-owned building on Logan Square.
Representatives of the Boy Scouts of America's Cradle of Liberty Council were notified that to remain in their 79-year-old landmark headquarters, they needed to pay the city a "fair market" rent, Fairmount Park Commission president Robert N.C. Nix said yesterday. Currently, the rent is $1 a year....
(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: ban; boyscouts; bsa; childmolesters; discrimination; gaystapotactics; homofascism; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; jerks; lawsuit; moralabsolutes; philadelphia; politicalcorrectness; scouting; scouts; stalinism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 401-409 next last
To: Ditto
141
posted on
10/18/2007 10:33:09 AM PDT
by
trumandogz
(Hunter Thompson 2008)
To: Pyro7480
So, is the land worth $200,000 per year, or is the city trying to charge rent on the Boy Scouts own building?
To: Steve_Seattle; chaosagent
A contract is a contract. If the Scouts built the building in return for the rent, and the city wants to break the deal seems to me the City of Philadelphia may well have purchased a really expensive building.
Things probably worth half to 3/4 of a billion dollars, and that's just a bottem end guess, eh!
Well, I'm sure the city's lawyers will understand that.
To: trumandogz
The BSA used to be able to make a difference. They are hopelessly outnumbered today.
I agree, they should pull up and rent the building to the city.
Maybe they could rent it for 1$ a year for awhile. Then they could charge repair and maintenance fees.
144
posted on
10/18/2007 10:35:05 AM PDT
by
rawcatslyentist
(Hey Jessie, how much melanin do you have to have to form a socially acceptable lynch mob?)
To: Tenacious 1
That is all taken into consideration. However, their improvements become mine.
145
posted on
10/18/2007 10:35:16 AM PDT
by
trumandogz
(Hunter Thompson 2008)
To: Pyro7480
So, the city does not support freedom of assembly or association? Oh, I forgot, the BSA is a “traditionalist” group.
146
posted on
10/18/2007 10:35:30 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: restornu
But since the shoe is not on the other foot, your comment makes no sense.
147
posted on
10/18/2007 10:36:19 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
To: trumandogz
receive free rent from the city? You have made this same incorrect statement at least four times in this thread. The rent is not free. The Scouts pay a legally recognized amount of $1.00/year -- in accordance with their agreement with with the City.
Therefore, your whole premise of "free land" is false and your argument collapses under it's own weight.
To: Pyro7480
Portland, Maine, is a good candidate for SF East too.
Why do these perverts want to destroy everything good and decent about America????
149
posted on
10/18/2007 10:37:26 AM PDT
by
MrLee
(Sha'alu Shalom Yerushalyim!! God bless Eretz Israel.)
To: been_lurking
One dollar a year is Free Rent.
150
posted on
10/18/2007 10:37:36 AM PDT
by
trumandogz
(Hunter Thompson 2008)
To: trumandogz
How can you people get this far into a thread without having actually read the article or at least other posts in an effort to reasonably articulate cognoscente thoughts about the stated issue.
I thought only liberals and MSM made knee jerk judgments and reactions to two-bit headlines.
C’mon!
151
posted on
10/18/2007 10:37:37 AM PDT
by
Tenacious 1
(No to nitwit jesters with a predisposition of self importance and unqualified political opinions!)
To: Mean Maryjean
Yes, that is true, although there have ben troops that have kicked out atheist and gay youths, that is up to the troop, not the national or council level.
To: Petronski
Im just flagging your anti-Catholic bigotry for what it is.
Is it bigotry when someone refers to historical events? Just asking. I've got nothing against Catholics or any other people. Heck, my parents are Catholic.
153
posted on
10/18/2007 10:38:05 AM PDT
by
Hazwaste
(Now with added lemony freshness!)
To: trumandogz
"But why should the scouts get free land from the city?"
They are not getting free land. They are getting a nominal rental fee because THE SCOUTS BUILT THE BUILDING, per the full story that is linked in the excerpt shown here. What we don't know are the full terms of the original agreement between the Scouts and the city, and whether the agreemet had an expiration date or any other provisions that would allow the city to unilaterally terminate or amend it.
154
posted on
10/18/2007 10:38:29 AM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Petronski
You can’t even be honest in your own head! LOL
That’s alright the Lord love you anyway!:)
155
posted on
10/18/2007 10:38:36 AM PDT
by
restornu
(No one is perfect but you can always strive to do the right thing! PRESS FOWARD MITT!)
To: trumandogz
Exactly. Why are the Boy Scouts on Welfare? Most, if not all, scouting organizations participate as unpaid volunteers at community functions and special events. If they didn't, the city would have to staff those events at a significant cost.
156
posted on
10/18/2007 10:39:24 AM PDT
by
Bob
To: trumandogz
Your statement is a non-sequitor.
It’s now been established on the thread that the boy scouts built this building with their funds, and the City gets plenty of benefits from the Boy Scouts.
Yes, the Boy Scouts do deserve public help. Such as allowing the boy scout troops to use schools for meetings, etc. The benefits to the community in reducing juvenile delinquency and building up solid citizens more than pays for the minor costs involved, which is less than the maintenance of a park or two.
157
posted on
10/18/2007 10:39:51 AM PDT
by
WOSG
(I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
To: restornu
You’re bearing false witness against me while inhaling and praying for me while exhaling.
As I said, you make no sense.
158
posted on
10/18/2007 10:40:18 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
To: Petronski
159
posted on
10/18/2007 10:41:29 AM PDT
by
restornu
(No one is perfect but you can always strive to do the right thing! PRESS FOWARD MITT!)
To: Steve_Seattle
The rights of the property owner supersede those of the tenant.
And if a tenant wishes to improve a property the improvements become property of the landlord.
160
posted on
10/18/2007 10:41:35 AM PDT
by
trumandogz
(Hunter Thompson 2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 401-409 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson