Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking News: Former Speaker Hastert to resign
Los Angeles Times ^ | October 17, 2007

Posted on 10/18/2007 8:39:51 AM PDT by george76

The Roll Call newspaper in Washington reported on its website this evening that former House Speaker Dennis Hastert of Illinois intends to resign his House seat later this year.

The subscription-only site said Hastert, who had already announced he would not seek reelection in 2008, was calling friends and associates today and telling them of his decision. His early departure would create the need for a special election in his exurban Chicago district, possibly on Illinois' Feb. 5 presidential primary day.

The 65-year-old former high school teacher and wrestling coach, first elected to the U.S. House in 1986 after six years in the Illinois house, has easily won reelection in the state's 14th District in recent years...

(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 200710; dennishastert; elections; hastert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: 1rudeboy

Yep, the court was also wrong.


41 posted on 10/18/2007 9:14:33 AM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

I only included Paul as a reference. I agree with the “throw the bums out” mentality regarding government spending but as a practical matter, I’d still rather start with the Dems.


42 posted on 10/18/2007 9:15:02 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
I'm throwing this out there, in case anyone wishes to educate themselves:

We hold that the compelled disclosure of privileged material to the Executive during execution of the search warrant for Rayburn House Office Building Room 2113 violated the Speech or Debate Clause and that the Congressman is entitled to the return of documents that the court determines to be privileged under the Clause.

43 posted on 10/18/2007 9:15:43 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Great. The court was still wrong about this in my view.

As was Denny Hastert.


44 posted on 10/18/2007 9:19:32 AM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
First of all, I don't know what Hastert actually said, so I can't even determine whether the court agreed with him or not. And no one is willing to elaborate up to this point.
45 posted on 10/18/2007 9:21:31 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
"When does the mass retirement of Democrats start?"

Democrats do have a lot more older members of Congress than Republicans. I think Democrats have 26 over 70 to Republicans’ 15 over 70 in Congress. Democrats have I think 84 to Republicans’ 52 in Congress between the ages of 60 and 69. Democrats should have more retiring from Congress than Republicans in the coming years. In the Senate though Republicans and Democrats I believe are even in the 60 to 69 demographic but Republicans have 15 over 70 to Democrats’ 10. A few more Republicans are likely to retire from the Senate than Democrats in the coming years. Both houses are graying more than in the past, with the average age of members creeping up. We could probably do without so many senile old farts. These Senators often run for new six year terms when they are already in their mid seventies or older. It’s getting so expensive to run campaigns these days there is a lot of pressure on these guys to stay in longer and longer so we can have incumbents in office that are tough to beat. We’ll probably see more and more dying in office or having to get out because they get Alzheimer's disease or other serious age related maladies.

46 posted on 10/18/2007 9:22:02 AM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Well what do you know, I agree with you! Throw them all out, starting with the Rats.


47 posted on 10/18/2007 9:23:17 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Okay.


48 posted on 10/18/2007 9:23:40 AM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
I’ll never forgive his ‘congress is above the law’ insanity in regards to Jefferson.

That's how I'll always remember him.

49 posted on 10/18/2007 9:26:03 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Methinks he doth protest way too much about that whole William Jefferson affair.

Officers of the executive branch literally raided Capitol offices. I can't imagine any congressional leader from any party in any period in history who would let that stand.

That doesn't mean that members of Congress are immune, or even that congressional offices are off-limits; just that the congressional leadership should have been consulted and the Capitol police should have formally executed the warrant (with the Feds along for the ride).

50 posted on 10/18/2007 9:28:31 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
And just how safe is Hastert’s district?

Very.

51 posted on 10/18/2007 9:29:54 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
When does the mass retirement of Democrats start? I guess they can’t give up the socialist power. It seems like it’s always Republicans retiring lately.

It's no fun going from the majority party to the minority party, and there were a lot of Democrat retirements after the '94 election. If anything it's an indication that a lot of GOP members don't expect to return to the majority any time soon.

52 posted on 10/18/2007 9:33:11 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo

Hastert’s district has had a huge influx of illegal aliens. It is probable that a lot of them are also now illegal voters because of motor voter and hispanic organizing campaigns.

It is a process that is being seen in a lot of new areas.
Illegals in northern Virginia, actively recruited and registered by La Raza and LULAC and MeCHa made the difference in Webb’s 9000 vote victory over Allen.

Election fraud by illegals is one of American politics’ dirty little secrets, and Republican candidates can’t do much about it without being labelled as racists.


53 posted on 10/18/2007 9:34:11 AM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

I never liked Hastert.


54 posted on 10/18/2007 9:34:25 AM PDT by gunservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

‘That’s how I’ll always remember him.’

Yep. Damn shame, given how long he served in office. I can’t help but think things would have been handled differently if DeLay had still been there at the time.


55 posted on 10/18/2007 9:35:07 AM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: george76
Boy, if I was one of those Conspiracy Theory subscribers, I would observe that we are near the completion date of the Socialist takeover of the U.S.A.

Phoney "Republicans" are bailing out daily, so they can be replaced by Socialists/Progressives/Democrats, and the '08 Congress ill have super-majorities in both Houses, and the Hildabeast will take the throne. This will complete passage of all necessary preparation for the appointment of 2 or 3 activist replacement Justices at the USSC, and all 3 branches of government then are at the control of the Socialist Elites, and the Constitution will be relegated to the ash heap of history in total.

Is this scary, or what????

56 posted on 10/18/2007 9:45:00 AM PDT by traditional1 (GO TRIBE !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunservative

does he have a wide stance also?

WIFE-O-BUCKHEAD


57 posted on 10/18/2007 9:50:11 AM PDT by Buckhead (making the comments buckhead won't make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo

“And just how safe is Hastert’s district?”

Safe for what? big government spenders like Hastert?


58 posted on 10/18/2007 9:56:32 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
He never met a donut or a spending bill he didn’t like. Tip O’Neil was positively miserly compared to Hasterets Congress.

Wasn’t there something about him buying land cheap, selling high and then an exit ramp off a Fed highway was put in?

59 posted on 10/18/2007 10:03:50 AM PDT by Leisler (Liberal (adj.) [lib-er-uh / lib-ruhl] 1. a narcissistic sufferer of grand delusions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: george76
Hastert, Lott and Frist. Three Republican leaders who could have gone down in history as being the greatest who ever held their positions. Instead, they let their members get away with the worst spending spree the hill has ever embarked on. They also let the likes of Jack Abramoff push his way around the house and senate like he owned the place. It’s leaders like them that lifted the Democrats back into power.
60 posted on 10/18/2007 10:06:32 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson