Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/15/2007 10:56:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Jim Robinson

I vote for MY Conservative Candidate in the Primary; Will vote for the nominee in the General..!


47 posted on 10/15/2007 11:33:54 PM PDT by Jay Howard Smith (Retired(25yrNCO)Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; All

Fred Thompson on the issues:
“National Security The first responsibility of government is to protect the American people, the homeland, and our way of life. Today we face the urgent threat of radical Islamic terrorists. Al Qaeda is committed to attacking us here at home, and wants to use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to kill millions. We must never give them that opportunity.

We must defeat the terrorists abroad, and that begins in Iraq and Afghanistan ; the central fronts in this global war. We must show the world we have the will to fight and win. A weakened America - or an America that appears weaker - will only encourage further attacks. We must persevere. As Commander-in-Chief, the president must ensure the United States has the means to achieve victory. Presidential leadership requires talking to the American people about these stakes, mapping out a clear vision for success, and devising a comprehensive strategy for achieving it. I am committed to: A larger, more capable, and more modern military that can defeat terrorists, deter adversaries, and defend the U.S. and our interests.

A missile defense system that can protect the U.S. and our allies from long-range ballistic missiles. An enhanced intelligence community, with robust human-intelligence capabilities, focused on terrorism and proliferation. A robust approach to homeland security that will protect our nation from terrorists and WMD, regardless of where they come from. A strengthened system of global alliances to better combat terrorists, proliferators, and traditional threats to our interests.

A judicial system that deals with the realities of terrorists and unlawful enemy combatants. Federal Budget and Spending/Budgetary Reform In a few short years—not a generation from now—a fiscal tsunami that could imperil our security and economic prosperity will hit our nation and place an unfair burden of debt on our children and grandchildren. The tens of trillions of dollars in debt that will be accumulated over the next few decades will do immense harm to our economy.

This burden is now estimated at $170,000 per person and $440,000 per family. Time is running out to address this looming crisis. We need market-based approaches to reform that guarantee benefits for those who need them and embrace personal responsibility and cost-effectiveness without raising taxes. Given the scope and urgency of this problem, and the burden it will place on our children, reform is not only an economic necessity, it is a moral imperative that requires action now. I am committed to: Opening the government’s fiscal books on this looming crisis for all to see and understand. Working with individuals of all political persuasions to develop a comprehensive solution to the pending fiscal crisis.

Leading and making the hard choices necessary, to include cutting wasteful government spending, to safeguard our security, promote our prosperity, and protect our children and grandchildren from fiscal calamity. Tax Reform The U.S. tax code is broken and a burden on U.S. taxpayers and businesses, large and small. Today’s tax code is particularly hostile to savings and investment, and it shows. To make matters worse, its complexity is a drag on our productivity and economic growth. Moreover, taxpayers spend billions of dollars and untold hours each year filling out complicated tax returns, just so they can send more money to Washington, much of it for wasteful programs and the pet projects of special interests.

We need lower taxes, and we need to let taxpayers keep more of their hard-earned dollars—they know best where and how to spend them. And we need to make the system simpler and fairer for all. To ensure America’s long term prosperity and economic security, I am committed to: Fundamental tax reform built on the principles of simplicity, fairness, and growth. A new tax code that gets the government out of our citizens’ pocketbooks, while enhancing U.S. competitiveness abroad.

Dissolution of the IRS as we know it. Healthcare Americans have the best healthcare in the world. Some, however, choose not be insured; others cannot afford it. Every American should be able to get health insurance coverage that is affordable, fully accessible, and portable. Coverage should meet their individual needs and put them in control. Those who propose a one-size-fits-all Washington-controlled program ignore the cost, inefficiency, and inadequate care that such a system offers. Access to affordable, portable health care can be made available for all Americans without imposing new mandates or raising taxes.

Current government programs must also be streamlined and improved so that those who truly need help can get the health care they need. I am committed to a healthcare system that: Realigns programs and creates a system around individual consumers and patients by providing more information and more opportunities to choose affordable health care options that best meet their needs and those of their families. Improves the individual health of all Americans by shifting to a system that promotes cost-effective prevention, chronic-care management, and personal responsibility Modernizes delivery and administration of care by encouraging the widespread use of clinical best practices, medical information technology, and other innovations.

Increases competition and consumer choice while streamlining regulations through free-market solutions that benefit individuals and reduce costs for employers. Promotes and speeds medical research and life-sciences innovation. Government Effectiveness Our government is outdated, inefficient, and wasteful. It is often unable to perform even the most basic tasks our citizens expect. It is no longer enough just to want limited government; the American people deserve more effective government.

Given today’s challenges, we cannot afford—and shouldn’t accept—anything less than a nimble, effective, and efficient government that is able to focus its resources on the important issues facing our country. It must be able act on behalf of the American people and our national interests in a timely manner. The key to competent government is strong, committed leadership from the top.

The key to good government is good people who are well-managed and put the national interest first. I am committed to: Attracting and rewarding the best Americans to serve in government and ensuring they have the authority and resources needed to get the job done. Fixing government accounting so tax dollars are properly spent and the American people know exactly what they are being spent on. Improving government performance by making agencies accountable for accomplishing their missions on time and within budget.

Ensuring information technology systems are secure and that they give our government the capacity and effectiveness to get the job done. Building Strong Families Strong families are the bedrock of our nation and our culture. They are built around the sanctity of life and the institution of marriage, which is the union of a man and a woman. To counter coarseness in today’s culture that oftentimes victimizes our children and undermines the traditional values parents want to instill, we must not only protect but strengthen the institutions of family and marriage.

I am committed to: Using the Presidency to encourage policies that promote a culture of life, strengthen the institution of marriage and traditional families, and advance freedom of religion. Returning authority to the levels of government closest to families and communities—the states—and then protecting states from further intrusion by the federal government, the judiciary, and other states. Combating the spread of obscenity over TV and other media by making sure parents can better exercise their responsibilities. Immigration The United States is a nation of immigrants. Throughout our history, legal immigrants have brought energy, ideas, strength, and diversity to our country, our economy, and our culture. This must continue. But in the post-9/11 world, immigration is more of a national security issue. A government that cannot secure its borders and determine who may enter and who may not, abrogates a fundamental responsibility. I am committed to: Securing our borders and enforcing immigration laws. Amnesty is not an option and the toleration of “sanctuary cities” must end.

Reviewing our immigration laws and policies to ensure they advance our national interests. Uniting Americans by welcoming legal immigrants willing to learn English, assimilate into our communities, and become productive citizens. Education A well-educated citizenry is vital to our security, our economy, and our democracy. Despite the tens of billions of dollars spent on education by Washington each year, and the hundreds of federal education programs now in place, our children are still falling behind, particularly in subjects crucial to the global economy in which we live. At a time when America is behind other developed countries in education excellence, the federal role in education is too intrusive and too bureaucratic, and has become part of the problem.

State and local governments are closest to the parents, the kids, and the schools, and best situated to implement changes and innovations that best educate children. I am committed to: Giving parents more choices in education and schools less bureaucracy. Reviewing federal programs for cost-effectiveness, reducing federal mandates, returning education money to the states, and empowering parents by promoting voucher programs, charter schools, and other innovations that enhance education excellence through competition and choice.<[P> Encouraging students and teachers to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and math—fields that are crucial to our security, competitiveness, and prosperity. Promoting transparency to assess performance, promote accountability, and share innovations in education at all levels. Appointing Judges Faithful To Our Constitution Activist judges across the country seem intent on legislating from the bench to promote a culture of abortion, redefine marriage, and undermine families—in effect re-shaping the values of our entire society without the consent of the people. We need judges who recognize their role in our democracy is to interpret, not make, the law. I am committed to: Appointing strict constructionist judges who will interpret the law, not impose their views on us by legislating from the bench. Energy Security

The energy challenges our nation faces today are real and significant. Our dependence on foreign sources of oil threatens our national security and puts our economic prosperity at risk. America must rise to the challenge and take the steps necessary to become more energy independent before this becomes a crisis. No one solution will solve the energy challenges we face; all ideas must be on the table. Greater energy security will enhance our ability to pursue our foreign policy and national security objectives. Increasing our energy independence and investing in alternative energy sources will also produce a healthier environment.

And while we don’t know for certain how or why climate change is occurring, it makes sense to take reasonable steps to reduce CO2 emissions without harming our economy. Overall, I am committed to: A balanced approach to energy security that increases domestic supplies, reduces demand for oil and gas, and promotes alternative fuels and other diverse energy sources. Investing in renewable and alternative fuels to promote greater energy independence and a cleaner environment. An energy policy that invests in the advanced technologies of tomorrow and places more emphasis on conservation and energy efficiency.

Conducting research and development into technologies that improve the environment, especially the reduction of CO2 emissions. Second Amendment I strongly support the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms. Gun control is touted as a major crime-control measure. But some of the places with the strictest gun-control laws also have high violent-crime rates. Disarming law-abiding citizens does not prevent crime.

he answer to violent crime is smart, effective, and aggressive law enforcement. The real effect of these gun-control measures is to place onerous restrictions on law-abiding citizens who use firearms for such legal activities as self-defense, sport-shooting, hunting, and collecting. I am committed to: Strictly enforcing existing laws and severely punishing violent criminals. Protecting the rights individual Americans enjoy under the Second Amendment”

http://www.Fred08.com


48 posted on 10/15/2007 11:34:03 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Security * Unity * Prosperity | Fred08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Our Republic is at risk.

After observing them for 33 years, the lesson I've learned is that nothing will destroy our Republic faster than the Clintons.

55 posted on 10/15/2007 11:39:46 PM PDT by HAL9000 (FRED2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

If the candidates of both parties are a continuing danger to the few freedoms that remain to us since the destruction of the original Constitutional Republic, there is only one logical course of action specified in the founding documents.


58 posted on 10/15/2007 11:43:59 PM PDT by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Vote for candidates who are straightforward and realistic, and who don’t paint the world in an overly rosy or oversimplified light.


60 posted on 10/15/2007 11:45:19 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

This might have been motivated by what happened with “Benedict” Ahnold and the bills he’s just passed. Live and learn indeed — I worked on his campaign at his headquarters! And now he is making sure that all California textbooks MUST include gay parents as the norm. I pulled my kids out of public school just in time.


63 posted on 10/15/2007 11:49:37 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
382 days will go by fast. I can’t believe it’s that time again. BTTT
65 posted on 10/15/2007 11:51:39 PM PDT by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Those are wise words Jim.

And although it appears that a huge majority of Freepers are rallying around Fred Thompson, I am unconvinced of Thompson's conservatism, and no less than Richard Viguerie and Jerome Corsi have come out and stated that Thompson is just one more faux-conservative, dare I say it Jim?

Thompson is a RINO.

Viguerie compiled a list of votes of Thompson while in the U.S. Senate, based on material from the American Conservative Union, and what I see does not augur well for a Thompson candidacy, nomination or run for the White House:

* FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. 1998

* FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) 2000

* AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. 1999

* AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” 2001

* FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. 1995

* FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. 1996

* AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. 1997

* FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. 1995

* FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. 1995 and 1999

* FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. 1996.

* FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. 1998

* FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. 2000

* FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). 1999

* AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. 2001

* AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. 1997

* FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. 1997

* FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for everyone. 2002

* FOR limitations on campaign freedom of speech, by limiting contributions to national political parties to $2,000 and limiting the rights of individuals and groups to participate in the political process in the two months before elections. 2002. (McCain-Feingold)

In my view, the only true conservative who is right on the issues, pro-family, pro-life, is focused on national security and the need to secure our borders, is Congressman Duncan Hunter. And I readily admit that in polling data, Hunter has had, and has before him a tough row to hoe, but I believe that if a flake like Howard Dean can break out in 2004 and come close to building the momentum necessary to win a political nomination, (based on polls and based on his internet organizational efforts), then certainly someone with character, intelligence and experience like Hunter can go MUCH farther.

And it isn't inaccurate to point out that after Thompson served a third of one term, (2 years after a special election in '94) and then one whole 6 year term as Senator, he chose to quit.

Duncan Hunter has never quit and his 26+ years of leadership and support for our military testifies to that.

I'm calling it a night, hope all is well with you Jim.

MKJ
67 posted on 10/15/2007 11:55:21 PM PDT by mkjessup (Jan 20, 2009 - "We Don't Know. Where Rudy Went. Just Glad He's Not. The President. Burma Shave.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I’m just hoping we have a president that will bring us all back together (on the right). Some obviously won’t do that, but I think a few good men could bring back the conservative movement.

I know we’ll never please the left...no matter what.

Our goal should be unity in purpose, and the purpose being: individual rights, moral fortitude, a sovereign nation, and a reasoned foreign policy.

That sums up my desires. As long as we’re consistant and persistant, we’ll break-through our barriers.


68 posted on 10/15/2007 11:55:21 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Well put Jim!

Worth a "Reup" on my monthly donations!

BUMP!!!

77 posted on 10/16/2007 12:12:27 AM PDT by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Start working on dismantling the federal behemoth and returning the power to the states and the people as originally intended.

I'm all for that. The powerful central government is the root of all the other problems that you listed.

But I've been around long enough now and have seen the federal government continue to bloat, unrestrained, despite which party is in power, that I am utterly pessimistic about dismantling the 'federal behemoth', short of a revolution.

Never vote for or support a candidate that is not for the dismantling of social security.

Never vote for or support a candidate that is for the redistribution of wealth through socialistic programs called 'entitlements'.

78 posted on 10/16/2007 12:16:02 AM PDT by cowboyway (My heroes have always been Cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
I agree with every single point you just made!

I wish we could get Republican presidential candidates like you, JR. Why is it that there are always two or three issues that make a guy hold his nose when he votes for those guys in a general election (or even in a primary)? I never agree with prominent Republicans on every issue. I thought it came with the territory. Yet here you are and I find myself agreeing with you wholeheartedly on every single point.

Perhaps you should think about running, Jim? You have a large ready-made base of support already; namely, most of us Freepers. Who knows? You may be cut out for bigger things than simply being an internet innovator. Cheers!

80 posted on 10/16/2007 12:18:31 AM PDT by LibWhacker (Democrats are phony Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Amen. Its time we began asking every GOP candidate whether they subscribe to the above principles. We must cease supporting the lesser of two evils out fear the Democrats might win. I'm on the side of good and an optimist when I say we will win when we are true to ourselves and know the right as God gives us to see the right. Let's ask nothing but the highest standards of our party's next presidential candidates and indeed, of all of our party's candidates in the next election.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

83 posted on 10/16/2007 12:24:05 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; DaveLoneRanger

Looks to me that if we’re going to have to start a grass roots movement, it needs to start HERE, on FR.

And Dave, I couldn’t agree more with you about growing wary of Fred Thompson. In fact, I’ve been considering changing my tag line of late. So far, he’s a yawner.


85 posted on 10/16/2007 12:24:59 AM PDT by Humidston (THOMPSON/WATTS - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Never ever support or elect candidates who are weak on defending the 1st amendment...

So much for FRed.

Remember McCain-Feingold-Thompson?

89 posted on 10/16/2007 12:30:01 AM PDT by Gelato (... a liberal is a liberal is a liberal ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

No compromise - That’s why Duncan Hunter is a good choice.


97 posted on 10/16/2007 12:42:24 AM PDT by jer33 3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
As I've posted before, if you're one to hold out for the absolute, pure, 100% conservative (definitions for this word vary from person to person), and will not vote for anything else, you will lose. Almost. Every. Time.

If you're OK with that, then so be it.

Politics is about compromise. It's maddening, but it's true.

I plan to vote for the candidate who comes closest to my ideals, and who can realistically win the election.

Right now, that candidate is Mitt Romney.

99 posted on 10/16/2007 12:43:31 AM PDT by TChris (Cartels (oil, diamonds, labor) are bad. Free-market competition is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

add:

never, never, never, never, ever....vote for a democrat.
never.


107 posted on 10/16/2007 12:53:46 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

“[The gay agenda is]about forcing employers to employ cross dressers and other perverts against their will.”

And more importantly, it’s about empowering leftists with the right to SUE and hence TRANSFER MONEY from people who have decent values, thereby putting more money and power to work for the left and taking it away from the right. That’s really what lefties are talking about when they say “gay rights”. Money and power.


125 posted on 10/16/2007 1:53:40 AM PDT by CaliGirlGodHelpMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I’m going to have to agree with you Jim.

You’re right.


135 posted on 10/16/2007 3:38:47 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hillary has pay fever. There she goes now... "Ha Hsu, ha hsu, haaaa hsu, ha hsu...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson