Skip to comments.
John Edwards Denies Tabloid Report of Affair
The Associated Press ^
| 10/11/07
Posted on 10/11/2007 7:49:49 PM PDT by LdSentinal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: Obie Wan
I think he’s being sarcastic since Ann Coulter called Edwards a faggot.
Comment #62 Removed by Moderator
To: sure_fine
"...wow, this has clinton finger prints all over it..."
Yeah right, Hillary's campaign really needs to draw attention to a sex scandal.
On the other hand, that could be just exactly what she wants us to think, or not think.
Gosh this is all so confusing.
63
posted on
10/11/2007 9:16:35 PM PDT
by
Radix
(When I became a man, I put away childish things)
To: LdSentinal
I tend to doubt this is true. If it is, shame on him and if it isn’t, I’m sure he’ll sue. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt but if he blames any Republican for it, then all bets are off.
64
posted on
10/11/2007 9:17:45 PM PDT
by
peggybac
(Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
To: LibLieSlayer
I did not have sexual relations with that woman... Ms. Lewinski... not one time. Is that what he said? "NOT ONE TIME"? I guess he meant more than one time. We were probably all supposed to get it.
65
posted on
10/11/2007 9:18:06 PM PDT
by
Aria
(NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
To: peggybac
I’m taking a bet right NOW THAT THIS STORY IS TRUE.Do you want to bet ???
66
posted on
10/11/2007 9:20:26 PM PDT
by
Obie Wan
(Put some money on it)
To: Aria
He is der slickmeister!
LLS
67
posted on
10/11/2007 9:21:09 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: Obie Wan
I totally believe that the story is accurate.
Even if it isn’t, I also think that it is just desserts for one of the scummiest (i.e. Edwards) persons to ever come down the Pike.
68
posted on
10/11/2007 9:21:55 PM PDT
by
Radix
(When I became a man, I put away childish things)
To: All
"It's not the evidence.....it's the seriousness of the charge. The suspect is guilty. Therefore we must have a congressional investigation".
(..........the perpetual mantra of Democrat Senate and House members).
69
posted on
10/11/2007 9:34:44 PM PDT
by
MinuteGal
(Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !)
To: Doogle
with a mirror...that kisses back..
70
posted on
10/11/2007 9:46:27 PM PDT
by
Wil H
(Turning $1000 into $100,000 through cattle futures requires the "willing suspension of disbelief")
To: LdSentinal
“The supermarket newspaper reported that the former North Carolina senator had an affair with a woman”
REALLY?
A WOMAN?
71
posted on
10/11/2007 9:48:10 PM PDT
by
Grunthor
(Thank you Mack Strong, and may God Bless you and your entire family.)
To: finnman69
“I’ve been in love with the same woman for 30-plus years and as anybody who’s been around us knows, she’s an extraordinary human being, warm, loving, beautiful, sexy and as good a person as I have ever known,”
And if his wife ever finds out, he’s a dead man!
72
posted on
10/11/2007 9:49:08 PM PDT
by
Grunthor
(Thank you Mack Strong, and may God Bless you and your entire family.)
To: LdSentinal
Since Mr.John likes lawsuits so much I would think that if this were untrue that he would threaten a lawsuit. However, he hasn’t and it appears he won’t because then the world would find out who the other sexy woman is in his life.
73
posted on
10/11/2007 10:27:57 PM PDT
by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: JustaDumbBlonde
LOL. Could it be the Edwards campaign’s answer to Ann Coulter (plant the idea of John Edwards as woman-adoring stud), while taking the spotlight away from the Hildebeast at the same time, and making both John and Elizabeth look sympathetic for facing false scurrilous story??
I’m pretty cynical and contemptuous toward ALL of the leading Demagogues, but I would be astonished if that were really the scenario. Who knows, stranger things have happened.... it would be a THREE-fer for the campaign.....
74
posted on
10/12/2007 12:02:54 AM PDT
by
Enchante
(Democrat terror-fighting motto: "bleat, cheat, retreat, defeat while we suck on liberal teat")
To: LdSentinal
an aside: I have hardly ever even seen a copy of the National Enquirer, but I just came off a 4-hour flight the other day in which the guy next to me was “reading” a copy of it for just about the entire flight. I kept waiting for him to put it away and read/do something else, but he had the same issue (and it didn’t look very thick) in his hands for almost 4 hours, flipping back and forth all through it. I couldn’t imagine what could hold anyone’s attention for 4 hours in such a publication, but now I know!!!!
75
posted on
10/12/2007 12:07:11 AM PDT
by
Enchante
(Democrat terror-fighting motto: "bleat, cheat, retreat, defeat while we suck on liberal teat")
To: ElkGroveDan
I am going to be highly skeptical of any dirt that surfaces on anyone running against the Clintons.I agree.
76
posted on
10/12/2007 12:18:05 AM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: LdSentinal
Well everybody can hate me for this one.
He gets a pass from me, like this is news, there is no way in hell that the only woman on earth he’s having sex with is his wife. If my wife gained that much weight you could guarantee my sexual needs would be discreetly fulfilled elsewhere.
Yes, I know vows, this, that, REALITY is if YOU look like Liz Edwards and your husband hasn’t joined you in the I don’t care what I look like club he is finding satisfaction elsewhere with a very high degree of probability.
77
posted on
10/12/2007 12:28:07 AM PDT
by
word_warrior_bob
(You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
To: word_warrior_bob
"He gets a pass from me, like this is news, there is no way in hell that the only woman on earth hes having sex with is his wife. If my wife gained that much weight you could guarantee my sexual needs would be discreetly fulfilled elsewhere."

Maybe he looks at his wife and sees this girl. The girl he met and fell in love with in college. Maybe he looks at her and sees the woman who went through several very difficult procedures in order that they might have more children. It's difficult to say what is in a person's heart, even if that person is John Edwards. Although it's not outside the realm of possiblility, for the sake of his family, I hope he isn't fooling around.
78
posted on
10/12/2007 3:27:59 AM PDT
by
Mila
To: LdSentinal
79
posted on
10/12/2007 3:33:42 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(When it makes you mad -- "ping & grrrr" -- Freeper:pandoraou812)
To: Reagan79
This should put Edwards back in the lead for the nomination
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson