Skip to comments.
Would Rudy Be Good for the Courts?
National Review Online ^
| May 16, 2007
| Robert Alt
Posted on 10/10/2007 11:43:00 AM PDT by TitansAFC
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
looks like Roe worshipper Rudy911 has a pretty bad judicial record and philosophy.
1
posted on
10/10/2007 11:43:03 AM PDT
by
TitansAFC
To: FreeInWV; 383rr; abishai; Afronaut; airborne; Alberta's Child; Antonious; azhenfud; B Knotts; ...
The Stop Rudy ping list!
E-mail/ping me if you want on/off the list! SPREAD THE WORD!!!
2
posted on
10/10/2007 11:43:48 AM PDT
by
TitansAFC
("My 80% enemy is not my 20% friend" -- Common Sense)
To: TitansAFC
Rudy would pick Supreme Court Judges that mirror his views like every President.
Trouble is though I don’t support too many of his views:
gun control
abortion
amnesty for illegals
support for the homosexual agenda
support for illegals
etc.
Etc.
3
posted on
10/10/2007 11:46:31 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: TitansAFC
Rudy would pack the courts with New England lawyers, none of them conservative.
4
posted on
10/10/2007 11:46:45 AM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
To: TitansAFC
Rudy is a social liberal and you can bet the bank he will not support or appoint strict constructionists to the USSC. The best you can hope for with Rudy would be a O’Connor or a Kennedy. A better probability is another Souter. And, another reason not to support Rudy.
5
posted on
10/10/2007 11:48:29 AM PDT
by
MBB1984
To: Joe Boucher
Rudy would hire his cronies.
6
posted on
10/10/2007 11:49:36 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: TitansAFC
Rudy will never get a chance to screw up the judicial appointments . Hillary need only say “Alan Placa” a few thousand times .
7
posted on
10/10/2007 11:49:45 AM PDT
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
To: TitansAFC
but...but...we will have to trust Rooty...he is the only one than can beat Hillary...he will go against his history and be a real conservative...and he was a hero on 911...
blah,blah,blah...so all you dumb socons work to get out the vote for Rooty before we dump you forever...
No wonder we are known as the dumb party. Hillary could not ask for more.
8
posted on
10/10/2007 11:49:56 AM PDT
by
dforest
(Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
To: MBB1984
9
posted on
10/10/2007 11:51:57 AM PDT
by
avacado
(Republicans Destroyed Democrats' Most Cherished Institution: SLAVERY!)
To: avacado
Most likely the same type Rudy would pick. He is a social liberal. Why expect him to be conservative?
10
posted on
10/10/2007 11:54:09 AM PDT
by
dforest
(Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
To: indylindy
"Most likely the same type Rudy would pick." Nope. Think worse than you can imagine.
11
posted on
10/10/2007 11:56:07 AM PDT
by
avacado
(Republicans Destroyed Democrats' Most Cherished Institution: SLAVERY!)
To: Joe Boucher
"Rudy would pick Supreme Court Judges that mirror his views like every President."
Actually, I think that most Presidents choose their Supreme Court picks by accepting the choice of someone in their Administration that they trust to find someone who mirrors their views. Since Rudy is a lawyer, chances are he would choose his own instead of relying on a trusted aide. I feel confident Rudy's choices would be as bad or worse than Clinton's because he would have personal knowledge of his picks and would not be relying on someone else's judgment.
12
posted on
10/10/2007 12:03:51 PM PDT
by
penowa
To: TitansAFC
While I’m not enthused about Rudy, don’t these elections always come down to the lesser of two evils? Hillary simply cannot win!
13
posted on
10/10/2007 12:06:05 PM PDT
by
JZelle
To: penowa
" I feel confident Rudy's choices would be as bad or worse than Clinton's ..." As bad or WORSE than Hillary's choices? Put the cap back onto that cheap bottle of whine you are drinking. D-e-l-u-s-i-o-n...
Worse than Hillary's!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!
14
posted on
10/10/2007 12:09:52 PM PDT
by
avacado
(Republicans Destroyed Democrats' Most Cherished Institution: SLAVERY!)
To: TitansAFC
IMO, it’s not impossible Giuliani could end up appointing the first gay justice - he does not pay much attention to normal standards of “competence” or “experience” as a measure of fitness for an appointment (ex: his driver ends up chief of police)and his is not likely to care what politicians of either party would prefer he do - if fact he’s apt to do the opposite, just to show them who is in charge.
15
posted on
10/10/2007 12:13:36 PM PDT
by
M. Dodge Thomas
(Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
To: avacado
She would pick a Beyer at best, probably another Ginsburg. I am not suggesting that Rudy is as bad as Hillary or that we should not support Rudy in the unfortunate event that it comes down to Rudy v. Hillary.
I do, however, believe we can obtain a much better choice for a GOP nominee.
16
posted on
10/10/2007 12:14:17 PM PDT
by
MBB1984
To: TitansAFC
...the most liberal justices in the history of the Supreme Court William Brennan and Harry Blackmun owe their appointments to Republican presidents. Touted by Nixon as "a strict constructionist," Blackmun went on to AUTHOR Roe v. Wade
and some of the most progressive (and destructive) opinions on environmental rights.
17
posted on
10/10/2007 12:14:27 PM PDT
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: TitansAFC
He tried to sue gun manufacturers.
Nuff said.
18
posted on
10/10/2007 12:15:30 PM PDT
by
Badeye
(Free Willie!)
To: TitansAFC
Rudy appointed judges who were 80% democrat when he was Mayor.
Heck, he even appointed homosexuals as judges to family court!
19
posted on
10/10/2007 12:18:57 PM PDT
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: avacado
Laugh all you want. He is NO better than Hillary. Both are screaming liberals and if you don’t recognize that then perhaps you may be one also. I haven’t voted for a liberal of either party for 30+ yrs., and I do not intend to start now.
20
posted on
10/10/2007 12:19:14 PM PDT
by
penowa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson