Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I-69 still years away, officials say
The Monitor ^ | October 9, 2007 | Kyle Arnold

Posted on 10/09/2007 6:35:14 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

McALLEN — State transportation officials are still months from making a final decision about the location of the much-heralded Interstate 69 superhighway from Canada to Mexico.

Still deep in the preliminary study phases of an environmental impact assessment, Texas Department of Transportation officials are making headway toward a decision on whether to use existing U.S. highways 77 to Harlingen, 281 to Edinburg or 57, which connects to Laredo, or build an entirely new road.

I-69, known as Trans-Texas Corridor 69 in the state of Texas, is a proposal for a 2,600-mile highway system running from Canada to Mexico.

About 1,000 miles of that would run through Texas, starting near Texarkana, running through Houston and ending in McAllen, Harlingen or Laredo. But momentum for the project has been inconsistent since it was first proposed in 1994.

The I-69 project would be completed primarily using existing roads, but many stretches of highway would need complete overhauls or new stretches may be needed. In 2005, the projected cost for the Texas portion of the highway was $7.5 billion, but that figure has since increased, said Randall Dillard, a TxDOT spokesman.

Federal funding for huge highway projects is scarce. And there are concerns at the state level over where the road will go and how it will be funded, state officials say.

Any potential road would need to have space for six car lanes, four truck lanes and up to four rail lines, according to Doug Booher, environmental manager for TxDOT’s turnpike division.

TxDOT has spent the last several months studying the environmental impact of locating a new stretch of highway somewhere between Brownsville and Laredo.

After that process is completed next year, the agency plans to make a recommendation for using existing highways or building a new one. However, project analysts warn that step will take place only after months of studies and public hearings.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: cuespookymusic; dougbooher; dumbassengineering; i69; ih69; interstate69; paul; randalldillard; ronpaul; soixanteneuf; texas; transtexascorridor; trashtexasconjob; ttc; ttc69; tx; txdot; us281; us77
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 10/09/2007 6:35:15 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; AprilfromTexas; B4Ranch; B-Chan; ..

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


2 posted on 10/09/2007 6:35:58 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I-69 came out years ago.

I’ve got it on DVD.

/sarc


3 posted on 10/09/2007 6:39:22 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“transportation officials are still months from making a final decision about the location of the much-heralded Interstate 69 superhighway from Canada to Mexico.”

I don’t have any problem with this... As long as it’s a tunnel with no exits.


4 posted on 10/09/2007 6:43:53 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Why dont we put all that money for the road to the wall...just a thought ; )


5 posted on 10/09/2007 6:45:59 PM PDT by HungryRahul ( believe this sh*T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I-69, known as Trans-Texas Corridor 69 in the state of Texas, is a proposal for a 2,600-mile highway system running from Canada to Mexico.

I could get behind this idea, but only if there are no off-ramps between Mexico and Canada :-)

6 posted on 10/09/2007 6:46:07 PM PDT by IYellAtMyTV (Workday Forecast--Increasing pressure towards afternoon. Rum likely by evening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This was in today’s Townhall online:

http://www.townhall.com/content/18b82c48-cf75-4d2c-a501-82af424d6e8b


7 posted on 10/09/2007 6:49:23 PM PDT by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
I-69 came out years ago. I’ve got it on DVD.

That's the one that starred "Otto Fellato", right??

8 posted on 10/09/2007 6:53:10 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
That's the one that starred "Otto Fellato", right??

Yeah, and Lotta Thrustin too.

9 posted on 10/09/2007 6:57:52 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I know I have the brain of an adolescent boy trapt in my middle age body, but they can’t really be thinking of calling this road I-69?


10 posted on 10/09/2007 6:58:59 PM PDT by live+let_live
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: live+let_live

Part of it already exists, in Indiana and Michigan. I actually drove a stretch of it this past summer, from Flint to Port Huron.


11 posted on 10/09/2007 7:00:39 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IYellAtMyTV
I could get behind this idea, but only if there are no off-ramps between Mexico and Canada

You realize that's over 5,000 miles of fence to watch, right?

12 posted on 10/09/2007 7:08:23 PM PDT by ZOOKER ( Support global warming ... we midwesterners need a coastline too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Any potential road would need to have space for six car lanes, four truck lanes and up to four rail lines, according to Doug Booher, environmental manager for TxDOT’s turnpike division.

Pure vintage TXDOT Bravo Sierra!!! There is zero functional justification for placing passenger vehicles, trucks and rail in the same right-of-way. They each have different functions, roadbed needs -- and different destinations.

The only justification for doing so is to build TXDOT's empire.

13 posted on 10/09/2007 7:10:16 PM PDT by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: live+let_live

“I know I have the brain of an adolescent boy trapt in my middle age body, but they can’t really be thinking of calling this road I-69?”

It currently runs from Indy to Port Huron.

For the record, the Big Beaver Exit (exit 69) is on Interstate 75 in metro Detroit.


14 posted on 10/09/2007 7:16:49 PM PDT by TWohlford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford; live+let_live; Tolerance Sucks Rocks
For the record, the Big Beaver Exit (exit 69) is on Interstate 75 in metro Detroit.


15 posted on 10/09/2007 7:37:11 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Ahhh. I-69. Mutual sexual gratification with no fear of being screwed or pregnancy!!!


16 posted on 10/09/2007 7:40:56 PM PDT by dbacks (I forgot to pay the rent on my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HungryRahul

I second. All in favor? Good, motion approved.


17 posted on 10/09/2007 7:50:28 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; mnehrling; All
Federal funding for huge highway projects is scarce. And there are concerns at the state level over where the road will go and how it will be funded, state officials say.

Ron Paul managed to get an earmark of 13 million for this in March.

The pdf w/ the $13Million line item for I69 is here:

http://images.chron.com/content/news/photos/07/07/01/paul_earmarks/Transportation3.pdf

18 posted on 10/09/2007 7:53:56 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER; Brilliant
You realize that's over 5,000 miles of fence to watch, right?

Yeah, I posted with out reading any comments. If I had, I'd of seen Brilliant's brilliant idea. I like the tunnel better ;-)

19 posted on 10/09/2007 10:59:42 PM PDT by IYellAtMyTV (Workday Forecast--Increasing pressure towards afternoon. Rum likely by evening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IYellAtMyTV
Have seen

"of" seen?! Sheesh, what a maroon, LOL

20 posted on 10/09/2007 11:03:28 PM PDT by IYellAtMyTV (Workday Forecast--Increasing pressure towards afternoon. Rum likely by evening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson