Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas near the top for raking in federal dollars (Ron Paul - shrimp or pork? Serves up both)
Houston Chronicle ^ | 10/9/2007 | BENNETT ROTH

Posted on 10/09/2007 12:16:56 PM PDT by dirtboy

WASHINGTON — Texas has long viewed itself as a conservative bastion, but the Lone Star State ranked third in the nation between 2000 and last year in receipt of federal dollars, raking in aid and contracts worth more than $1.2 trillion.

An analysis by a private watchdog group found that state agencies and a number of congressional districts were major beneficiaries of the federal largesse. For example:

• Rep. Ron Paul has long crusaded against a big central government. But the maverick GOP lawmaker and presidential contender also has represented a congressional district that is consistently among the top in Texas in its reliance on dollars from Washington. In the first nine months of the federal government's 2006 fiscal year alone, it received more than $4 billion in federal aid.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: earmarks; oinkoink; paul; paulestinians; porkluver; prawnpaul; ronpaul; shrimpboaters4truth; shrimproll; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 10/09/2007 12:17:00 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

LOL. He’s for federalism for everyone else, apparently.


2 posted on 10/09/2007 12:18:12 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I like shrimp and pork. He could serve up all he wants, I’d still vote for Hunter LOL


3 posted on 10/09/2007 12:19:02 PM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Shrimp or pork?....neither is KOSHER!....................


4 posted on 10/09/2007 12:19:42 PM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I know Texans don’t like to talk about it , but Texas is really big .


5 posted on 10/09/2007 12:20:08 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I know Texans don’t like to talk about it , but Texas is really big .


6 posted on 10/09/2007 12:20:41 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Prawn Paul


7 posted on 10/09/2007 12:23:03 PM PDT by lormand ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
From the article:

Paul's spokeswoman, Rachel Mills, said the congressman is aware that his district ranks high as a recipient of federal dollars.

She said Paul will continue to support federal grants to the district,"as long as taxes are taken by force from the people of Texas."

She added, "While Congressman Paul strongly believes that federal spending is out of control, the government has made promises to people in the form of Medicare and Social Security that many rely on, and it would be wrong to break those promises."

---------------

Such a rationalizer, that Ron Paul. I'm sure Trent Lott says the exact same thing. But at least Trent Lott doesn't pretend to be a principled small-government federalist.

8 posted on 10/09/2007 12:23:31 PM PDT by dirtboy (Ron Paul - shrimp pimp rock schlockster surrender crustacean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

And I’m sure we are only talking about Medicaire and SS bennies. ROFL.


9 posted on 10/09/2007 12:25:13 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Given their proportional over-representation (especially in he Senate) i’s just a fact of political life that “red” states tend to be net gainers in Federal tax flows, and that on the average the more rural an area, the greater the advantage. So I think we can take it for granted that there will aways be a tension between political theory and political practice in this regard, irrespective of whether such areas are represented by Democrats or Republicans.


10 posted on 10/09/2007 12:27:46 PM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (Opinion based on research by an eyewear firm, which surveyed 100 members of a speed dating club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Principles are nice, so is getting reelected.


11 posted on 10/09/2007 12:29:01 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
I like shrimp and pork.

Add a little cajun seasons, some dirty rice and mmmmmmmmmm.....good eats.

12 posted on 10/09/2007 12:31:24 PM PDT by A_Tradition_Continues (THE NEXT GENERATION CONSERVATIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues

Indeed


13 posted on 10/09/2007 12:32:42 PM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

14 posted on 10/09/2007 12:34:41 PM PDT by darkangel82 (All right! Let's go Tribe!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Let me state that I am not a Paulite. Now that that’s out of the way I have to question why so much time is spent here on FR denouncing Ron Paul if, as many say here, he doesn’t stand a chance anyway. I really don’t see the Republicans putting forward any candidates of sterling moral character or espousing a platform that’s not socialism lite except maybe Fred Thompson and I wonder about him.

So why all the effort to smear Ron Paul?


15 posted on 10/09/2007 12:34:45 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
Let me state that I am not a Paulite.

I think of 'em as Paulie WalNUTS.

16 posted on 10/09/2007 12:38:13 PM PDT by GOP_Proud (Dream Act: What part of "no" do you not get?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
So why all the effort to smear Ron Paul?

Smear? Calling a candidate on his hypocrisy is a smear?

17 posted on 10/09/2007 12:40:11 PM PDT by dirtboy (Ron Paul - shrimp pimp rock schlockster surrender crustacean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

Because these people don’t want to make war on Saudi Arabia, the true state sponsor of terrorism and Wahabi poison, or even to find Osama Bin Laden. Instead they want to continue to endanger American military men and women and tax us into submission, only to endanger us with their short-sighted foreign policy blunders in Iraq.

It sounded radical at first, but the more I study Islamic history and Islamo-American relations, this is the only conclusion I can come to.


18 posted on 10/09/2007 12:43:10 PM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

You probably won’t get a reasonable response from the anti-Paul brigade, outside of “he wants to surrender to al-Queda” or some other nonsense.


19 posted on 10/09/2007 12:44:15 PM PDT by t_skoz ("let me be who I am - let me kick out the jams!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: t_skoz
Because these people don’t want to make war on Saudi Arabia...

Ron Paul advocates declaring war on Saudi Arabia?

He is a certified nutcase.

Or did you make that up.

Does he still support impeachment of GWB? From my keyword suggestions.

11. Paul States George Bush is an un-Constitutional President and Should Be Removed from Office

"I'd be surprised if they [Democrats] win both - I think they're going to win one body and if they win the House right now they do not say they would have an impeachment but I think the way that place operates I think they probably will make every effort," said Paul.

"If they happened to have a ten or fifteen vote margin that would be a political thing - it would be payback time."

" I would have trouble arguing that he's been a Constitutional President and once you violate the Constitution and be proven to do that I think these people should be removed from office."

12-Paul Accuses George Bush of Advocating Domestic Concentration Camps

Right now we don't have concentration camps, but like you have pointed out, the authority has been given so that concentration camps can come without Habeas Corpus. I have heard the argument that there is nothing else left in the Bill of Rights. If they can lock you up, what good is freedom of speech or what good is a gun? That is now part of the books, part of the law."


20 posted on 10/09/2007 12:49:40 PM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson