To: Strategerist
Here we go again. Conservative third party puts another Clinton in the White House.
Smart move.
15 posted on
10/04/2007 9:52:55 AM PDT by
Dudoight
To: Dudoight
Conservative third party puts another Clinton in the White House. A Rudy nomination would kill the GOP. Conservatives would have no incentive to work for Rudy. The folks who man the phones and knock on doors, volunteering and passing out campaign literature? That's the conservative base, hello.
I have no intention of supporting Rudy should he win the nomination.
(Hands over ears) "La-la-la, I don't care if Hillary wins, la-la-la..."
To: Dudoight
I too find it hard to swallow that the people in the GOP would be that stupid to form a third party thinking they could actually win.
Hillary would win in a landslide if that happens. If Christian Conservatives insist on this, they are ensuring 8 more years of the Clintons.
I am rather disgusted the the attitudes of people who are so blinded by their hatred of Rudy that they obviously don't give a rat's patoot that their arrogance is in Hillary's favor. She's banking on the Useful Idiots of the Republican Party to push her over the top. Looks like she outsmarted them again.
33 posted on
10/04/2007 10:02:36 AM PDT by
Stars&StripesNE
(Liberals are the enemy within)
To: Dudoight
Here we go again. Conservative third party puts another Clinton in the White House. Smart move. A much smarter move than putting a liberal Republican in the White House...
To: Dudoight
Here we go again. Conservative third party puts another Clinton in the White House. Smart move.
There's an easy way out of this. Make sure Rudy is trampled in the primaries.
Really, any Republican supporting Rudy is at fault for making such a nightmare scenario possible.
It's not like we haven't been warning you about this since last year....
127 posted on
10/04/2007 10:38:42 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
To: Dudoight
“Here we go again. Conservative third party puts another Clinton in the White House.”
When did that happen before? Social conservatives did not vote for Perot, who was pro-abortion.
130 posted on
10/04/2007 10:41:47 AM PDT by
upsdriver
(DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT!!!!)
To: Dudoight
Here we go again. Conservative third party puts another Clinton in the White House.
Smart move.
Here we go again. The GOP alienates conservatives by abandoning conservative principles to appease and compromise with the socialist left and then blames the end result on Conservatives.
Smart move.
205 posted on
10/04/2007 11:44:12 AM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: Dudoight
Here we go again. Conservative third party puts another Clinton in the White House. You are wrong about '92: Perot was not conservative. This time, the blame would go to the RINO's who voted for Rudy in the primaries.
254 posted on
10/04/2007 12:28:25 PM PDT by
stillonaroll
(Rudy = Hillary: pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-gun)
To: Dudoight
“Here we go again. Conservative third party puts another Clinton in the White House.Smart move” It was the last time. It ushered in the first truly conservative congress we have had during our lifetimes and created the first budget surplus ever. Republican control since has ruined all that.
353 posted on
10/04/2007 3:14:32 PM PDT by
monday
To: Dudoight
“Here we go again. Conservative third party puts another Clinton in the White House.”
Why do people ignore the fact that the GOP has not nominated a pro-abortion candidate in most of our lifetimes. And us pro-lifers are the ones who are shown to be the ones out of the norm.
Whatever.
499 posted on
10/08/2007 10:33:48 AM PDT by
Preachin'
(Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
To: Dudoight
Conservative third party No such thing. They care nothing about a Conservative agenda voting for a third party. They are sore losers because their special interest wasn't being fullfilled. If they really cared about Conservatism, they wouldn't be putting a liberal in office to elect liberal judges....which would put their 'special issue' to the left even more. Makes no sense.
515 posted on
10/09/2007 6:00:30 AM PDT by
Fawn
(http://www.brightlion.com/InHope/InHope_en.aspx)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson