Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"I honk for peace."

Yes...and you apparently flunk your job for peace too.

1 posted on 10/04/2007 7:02:34 AM PDT by DogByte6RER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


“’The First Amendment does not entitle primary and secondary teachers, when conducting the education of captive audiences, to cover topics, or advocate viewpoints, that depart from the curriculum adopted by the school system,’ the appeals court ruled.”

This MUST be the standard for all education, K-12 and college.


2 posted on 10/04/2007 7:03:40 AM PDT by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER

“”People ought to seek out peaceful solutions before going to war.””

yeah, we did that idiot.

You should be dismissed for being a moron.


3 posted on 10/04/2007 7:04:09 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER

I’m a teacher...and I am embarrassed that this ignorant person doesn’t know that her right to free speech does not include the right to indoctrinate her students contrary to the curriculum approved by the school. She flunks in every way...and is a poster child for what the NEA led teacher’s unions have done to our educational system.


4 posted on 10/04/2007 7:06:44 AM PDT by Keith (ANY REPUBLICAN in 2008 -- it's about defeating Mrs. Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER

This is an excellent precedent for all the socialist, leftist classroom politicians that INFEST OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM. Choke on it, libs.


6 posted on 10/04/2007 7:10:28 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER

I rather doubt the school fired her merely for making those few statements. But of course, as a leftist, she would never admit she was to blame for her own job loss. It’s always someone else’s fault.


8 posted on 10/04/2007 7:13:54 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
"I have gone all the way to the Supreme Court and I have still not had my day in court," said Mayer.

Wrong. The SC is the final appeals court in cases like hers. That she doesn't realize that when she lost her original case, she had her day in court - she should be thrown from teaching for cause - cluelessness.

9 posted on 10/04/2007 7:18:36 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER

“I have gone all the way to the Supreme Court and I have still not had my day in court,”

I think I hear that little violin in the background playing “My Heart Bleeds for You.”


11 posted on 10/04/2007 7:24:09 AM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
Deborah Mayer's long, lonely and expensive legal fight

One can only hope it was an extremely expensive lesson learned....
nah, no chance.
This schmuck has no clue as to the difference between education and indoctrination...any more than she understands the meaning of the First Ammendment.

12 posted on 10/04/2007 7:27:58 AM PDT by evad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
"People ought to seek out peaceful solutions before going to war."

Translation: "I have a problem with us defending ourselves anytime we have a Republican president".

14 posted on 10/04/2007 7:33:02 AM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
Notice how they try to mess with the timeline here.

Mayer said her troubles started on Jan. 10, 2003 -- the eve of the Iraq war...
Jan. 10, 2003 was NOT the eve of the Iraq war. That would be like saying Christmas Eve really falls on Columbus Day.

This proves that she's a moonbat all around, and was not necessarily just opposed to the Iraq war itself.

15 posted on 10/04/2007 7:39:46 AM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER

There used to be four primary rules for teachers on how to get fired:

1) Offend and anger your students.
2) Offend and anger their parents.
3) Offend and anger the other teachers and administrators.
4) Offend and anger the community.

Hotheads and radicals who become teachers are always horrified to learn that they are not permitted to use their podium as a soapbox to rant and rave in front of their students. They regard this as totally unfair, as it goes against their entire reason for wanting to “teach” in the first place.

There are, of course, other rules, some of which are not as obvious, such as “teachers are never fired for passing too many students”, “you should not have sex with your students”, and “never hit a student in front of witnesses, or in a way that leaves a mark.”


18 posted on 10/04/2007 7:54:48 AM PDT by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
"I honk for peace," Mayer, a veteran teacher in her first year at Bloomington, said she told them. She said she also told the students, "People ought to seek out peaceful solutions before going to war."

I suspect there was a lot more too it than saying that, that got her canned.

21 posted on 10/04/2007 8:41:09 AM PDT by Tribune7 (Michael Moore bought Haliburton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
"....during a weekly current-events indoctrination discussion in her Grades 4-6 class at Clear Creek Elementary School"
22 posted on 10/04/2007 8:44:37 AM PDT by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
"People ought to seek out peaceful solutions before going to war."

As we did! Seventeen U.N. resolutions ignored and repeated warnings later...

23 posted on 10/04/2007 9:14:16 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
She looks like she got hit in traffic while honking:


24 posted on 10/04/2007 9:29:06 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom (Socialism, thy name is Woman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DogByte6RER
Only a liberal would think the 1st amendment protects them from saying anything. The 1st only prohibits the government from making laws that trample on free speech rights. Schools and any other employer can take you to task for saying things they don't like, plus you can be sued for slander and libel. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences.

When a conservative talks, however, liberals are free to condem, ridicule and bring senate resolutions down on them because the 1st only applies to liberals/ Mega Sar

25 posted on 10/04/2007 10:02:26 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson