Posted on 10/01/2007 4:32:28 AM PDT by Man50D
"The NAFTA Superhighway stops here, at the border with Oklahoma," Randy Brogdon, a Republican state senator who has championed the fight to keep the Trans-Texas Corridor out of Oklahoma, told a packed 300-person audience at the first public meeting of OK-SAFE in Tulsa on Saturday.
Oklahomans for Sovereignty and Free Enterprise, Inc. is a non-profit, Oklahoma corporation set up to oppose the NAFTA Superhighway and the North American Union, as threats to the sovereignty of the United States.
Brogdon objected to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America www.spp.gov, arguing that President Bush had entered the agreement after secret discussions with Mexico's then-president Vicente Fox and Canada's then-prime minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005.
"President Bush has proven that he is more than willing to over-step his executive authority when it came to trade policy," Brogdon told the group.
"Ariticle 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution says, 'Congress shall have the Power to Regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States,' not the president," Brogdon pointed out. "Yet President Bush has entered into an agreement with Mexico and Canada called SPP that seeks to eliminate our trade and security borders and he has failed to get the explicit approval of Congress
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
DITTO !!!
Oh, I think I understand now, thanks.
I understand you fellows consider yourselves "freemarketeers", and a free marketplace without interference from government can be a beautiful thing. But let's be at least somewhat honest here, guys, what is being planned is anything but the "free market" you are envisioning.
It is control of everything, and not just "trade".
If I thought you two were simply ignorant, looking at the facts would probably open your eyes, but I see something else here; a willful ignorance, which is worse.
Not only do we have to continually be on guard against the insiders and their subterfuge, we also have FReepers who are acting as their "useful idiots".
Maybe the U.N. will let me do 90 mph legally.
I believe the date by which the tinfoil is supposed to become reality is 2010. So HILLARY! could be the one ushering all this in. Please ping me when it actually happens (holding breath until blue in the face).
I have no problem with defunding the actual working groups, as they are probably unconstitutional, provided their recommendations are implemented bureaucratically. They are also working behind closed doors, apparently. (can't have the people, as well as individual states and provinces, looking over their shoulders, now can we?)
I, for one, will continue to boycott the Amero.
Of course, there aren’t any, so it’s a pretty easy boycott as boycotts go.
That depends on whether you’re a Freemason or not.
Hey Gatun, good to see you —at first I thought you were missing but when I saw all your “in forum” posts I realized that more likely it was me doing the disappearing...
PDF at post 90 for download.
None of the Council on Foreign Relations members and globalist-aspiration to amnesty crowd want to stop the SPP and NAU nonsense. I have found the candidate who does!
>We’re talking about a road.<
We are taling about FAR MORE than just a road, 1rudeboy!
>We’re talking about a road.<
We are taling about FAR MORE than just a road, 1rudeboy!
_____________________________________________
Can't be Rudy, his law firm fronts for the Spanish company that is buying up all the toll roads it can get its hands on.
>Duncan Hunter should not mix in the NAFTA Superhighway with an otherwise good campaign.<
Who are you to say what Rep. Duncan Hunter should or should not do?
__________________________________________
Guadalajara would be the site of the POE for all PacRim goods coming into the US. The first time US Customs would get a look into any of the cargo would be in KC. We would have to rely on what the Senate Amnesty Bill itself called the top-to-bottom, public and private sector culture of corruption in Mexico to get it right.
The same think tanks that have crafted this project have also reccommended a NAU travel visa that would be good for any foreign individual's access to each of the three countries (States, really), regardless of that individual's point of entry. iow...the lowest paid rung on the culture of corruption ladder in Mexico's own Customs organization would have the power to stamp anybody's passport for unfettered access to my country.
We're talking about a road to hell, but this particular one is paved with the worst intentions.
"..unfettered access to my country.."
Thank you, sir.
Lots of changes coming down.
Another fer instance; new "trade" laws aimed at leveling the playing field for our less fortunate neighboring countries that sure as heck won't favor our side.
Complete changeover of our currency from the dollar et al into something called the "Amero", for which you get reimbursed cents-on-the-dollar for your obsolete and nearly worthless greenbacks.
New enviromental rules administered by (who else?) the United Nations, and the America-loving bureaucrats in Belgium.
New taxes based not on our sales of merchandise, but rather on our tendancy to pollute the earth with our filthy manufacturing plants, never mind that other countries will continue to get a pass on their even filthier plants.
U.S. citizens living under completely different laws administered by (who else again?) the U.N.
We will be known as the FORMER United States, and our Constitution, our freedom, and our once-loved and much-admired way of life will be gone forever.
Those changes.
Bump for post #90.
I heard on the Rolleye James’s show that the Council of Foreign Relations (I think it was them) admitted that the North American Union would be achieved by 2010.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.