Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

They had Dingell running around a year ago promising TAX CUTS if they won in Nov 2006. Guess I am surprised the Dems took this long before stabbing their voters in the back yet again on yet another issue.
1 posted on 09/27/2007 10:08:39 AM PDT by MNJohnnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: All

I have to be the first to say: What a Dingell-berry!


2 posted on 09/27/2007 10:09:19 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (If You Support America - Thank a Soldier; If You Support Al-Qaeda - Thank a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

A $5 tax on cigars and a 50 cent a gallon tax hike on gasoline. This is outrageous. Especially when all the country needs is a good 5 cent cigar and a place to smoke it.


3 posted on 09/27/2007 10:10:38 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Hillary 2008: "The willing suspension of disbelief")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

This old relic and his ancient ideas needs to be put out to pasture. He is a menace to society.


4 posted on 09/27/2007 10:11:34 AM PDT by kempster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
...who is marking his 52nd year in Congress

This is the absolute crux of the problem.

5 posted on 09/27/2007 10:11:40 AM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Yep - because that’ll certainly bring gas prices down, won’t it. The pundits were right - the DemoRATS will now be using the Global Warming Chicken Little Umbrella in order to institute new taxes “for our own good.” Trouble is, of course, that everyone’s getting sick of both the global warming mantra in general and these idiot Dems in Congress in particular. We were warned they’d raise taxes and OH LOOK! They are.


6 posted on 09/27/2007 10:13:10 AM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Remember Billy Dale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

How about before we soak Joe Middle Class with a huge tax increase, let’s first cut entitlement spending by 50% and cut Congressional salaries by 50%. Do that first, then we’ll talk about a gas tax increase.


7 posted on 09/27/2007 10:14:20 AM PDT by jgilbert63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
I don’t understand why the Republicans don’t use this and other raising tax comments to frame the democrats positions. The Republicans will just let it go and let the dims back them into a corner.
10 posted on 09/27/2007 10:17:19 AM PDT by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

The moronic Michigan Democrats have returned this guy to Congress 26 times (and, really, 37 times) - despite the fact that he lives in a UAW district where a gas tax would be yet another blow at one of MI’s few remaining large employers.


14 posted on 09/27/2007 10:19:49 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
What does he propose to do with the money that will decrease the effect of climate change?

I think the war on poverty should remind everyone that they have no freaking clue what they're doing and the money won't make one damn bit of difference.

15 posted on 09/27/2007 10:21:35 AM PDT by libs_kma (www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Another aspect of his proposal that could adversely affect the economy enormously is later in the story...

“—Phaseout of the interest tax deduction on home mortgages for homes over 3,000 square feet. Owners would keep most of the deduction for homes at the lower end of the scale, but it would be eliminated entirely for homes of 4,200 feet or more.

He estimates that would affect 10 percent of homeowners. He says “it’s only fair” to tax those who buy large suburban houses and create urban sprawl. Historic and farm houses would be exempted.”


16 posted on 09/27/2007 10:22:21 AM PDT by Breyean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

same story here
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1903026/posts


19 posted on 09/27/2007 10:24:41 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

“the pain is shared in a way that is fair, proper, acceptable and accomplishes the basic purpose”

This sort of tax is regressive. It has the greatest impact on the rural poor. They usually have long distances to travel for work, etc. They usually have no other alternative form of transportation. They usually are already paying the greatest cost for gas because they are subsidizing competitive pricing in urban areas.

This has a compound effect on the viability of local businesses in rural areas that cannot compete with other areas and countries because the cost of transporting the raw materials they produce becomes a limiting factor. Also, agriculture and timber indistries are large comsumers of oil products (diesel and fertilizers) and the tax, unless they are exempted, could raise the costs of inputs into their business. This could raise the cost of domestic food and wood products or render them non-competitive with foreign producers. It also creates greater input costs for the production of alternative fuels such as biomass and ethanol.

Bad urban idea.


25 posted on 09/27/2007 10:34:07 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

This will be one of the issues that will doom the Democrats. If Republicans are stupid and don’t take a firm stand against the Global warming foolishness they will be passing up a sure fire way to drive a wedge between the public and the Democrats desire for new taxes.

I’d be repeating a simple mantra, “Democrats think you aren’t paying enough for gasoline.” “Raise your hand if you think you don’t pay enough taxes or enough for your gasoline?”. It should be cast in terms of food and milk for babies. Tell the people in the crowds that you aren’t going to stand by while the carbon taxes and gasoline taxes raise the cost of groceries. I’d also put together a whole slew of simple effective phrases that will continually cast doubt in the mind of the public where the silly claims and fears of global warming are concerned. Make it a fight. People will have a propensity to not want to believe anything that will raise their taxes and cost of gasoline. Don’t let the left get away with this big lie.


26 posted on 09/27/2007 10:39:11 AM PDT by Maelstorm (You must not just speak sense, your words must be crafted to resonate in the minds of morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

What is the cure for Dingell?


27 posted on 09/27/2007 10:40:16 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Good luck Buckwheat!


29 posted on 09/27/2007 10:45:19 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
TERM LIMITS

Needed to save the Republic from these damned lifetime political careerists.

Damn them all!

30 posted on 09/27/2007 10:47:49 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Gentlemen:

Please direct the congressterd to the following...

http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/


32 posted on 09/27/2007 10:54:31 AM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

You know, if we can’t turn this into a winning issue, there’s no hope left for the country.


34 posted on 09/27/2007 10:57:20 AM PDT by Marathoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

He can KISS my ***, I don’t get ANYTHING back by supposedly “reducing Global warming”. THis is just another liberal-spendthrift policy (probably to pay for another bloated government program).


35 posted on 09/27/2007 10:58:32 AM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
"I'm trying to have everybody understand that this is going to cost and that it's going to have a measure of pain that you're not going to like,"

Fine. I have an idea. Resign fro the political trough and go back to where you came from and get a real job and pay for your own perks and maybe you'll get a clue how it feels to have a bunch of cavalier clowns like you pissing our money away faster than we can earn it

36 posted on 09/27/2007 11:00:49 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson