Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman John Dingell Proposes 50-cent Gas Tax Hike to Fight Global Warming
Fox News ^ | 09-27-07 | AP via Fox News

Posted on 09/27/2007 10:08:35 AM PDT by MNJohnnie

Dealing with global warming will be painful, says one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress. To back up his claim he is proposing a recipe many people won't like — a 50-cent gasoline tax, a carbon tax and scaling back tax breaks for some home owners.

"I'm trying to have everybody understand that this is going to cost and that it's going to have a measure of pain that you're not going to like," Rep. John Dingell, who is marking his 52nd year in Congress, said Wednesday in an interview with The Associated Press.

Dingell will offer a "discussion draft" outlining his tax proposals on Thursday, the same day that President Bush holds a two-day conference to discuss voluntary efforts to combat climate change.

But Dingell, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee that will craft climate legislation, is making it clear that he believes tackling global warming will require a lot more if it is to be taken seriously.

"This is going to cause pain," he said, adding that he wants to make certain "the pain is shared in a way that is fair, proper, acceptable and accomplishes the basic purpose" of reducing greenhouse gases, mainly carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 110th; 2008; democratparty; democrats; democratsagenda; dingell; economy; electionpresident; elections; energy; globalwarming; marines; taxincrease; worstcongressever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: libs_kma

It makes a big difference. All that tax money allows “walkin’ around” money payments to get re-elected.


21 posted on 09/27/2007 10:30:34 AM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

My best friend was one of the civilian housing officers at Ramstein. He told me he could have made a FORTUNE selling the U.S. gas coupons they were issued.

In fact, isn’t the tax per Litre? Which makes it even more oppresssive.


22 posted on 09/27/2007 10:31:29 AM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Remember Billy Dale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ
Many Americans are up in arms over the high price of gas, so this will go over really well

The people who are dumb enough to vote Dem in the first place aren't even aware of how much tax is included in the price of a gallon of gasoline. If this tax ever passes, it will be immediately followed by a barrage of MSM stories about record oil company profits and CEO salaries. By the time the idiots see the jump at the pump, they'll already have their bad guy.

23 posted on 09/27/2007 10:33:43 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Breyean
Historic and farm houses would be exempted

In other words, middle class families who work hard and do well and can afford to build nice-sized homes will be punished.

Meanwhile, the homes of the very wealthy will be exempt - since they have already inherited historic homes or will be able to spend millions to purchase and rehab old properties.

24 posted on 09/27/2007 10:33:48 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

“the pain is shared in a way that is fair, proper, acceptable and accomplishes the basic purpose”

This sort of tax is regressive. It has the greatest impact on the rural poor. They usually have long distances to travel for work, etc. They usually have no other alternative form of transportation. They usually are already paying the greatest cost for gas because they are subsidizing competitive pricing in urban areas.

This has a compound effect on the viability of local businesses in rural areas that cannot compete with other areas and countries because the cost of transporting the raw materials they produce becomes a limiting factor. Also, agriculture and timber indistries are large comsumers of oil products (diesel and fertilizers) and the tax, unless they are exempted, could raise the costs of inputs into their business. This could raise the cost of domestic food and wood products or render them non-competitive with foreign producers. It also creates greater input costs for the production of alternative fuels such as biomass and ethanol.

Bad urban idea.


25 posted on 09/27/2007 10:34:07 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

This will be one of the issues that will doom the Democrats. If Republicans are stupid and don’t take a firm stand against the Global warming foolishness they will be passing up a sure fire way to drive a wedge between the public and the Democrats desire for new taxes.

I’d be repeating a simple mantra, “Democrats think you aren’t paying enough for gasoline.” “Raise your hand if you think you don’t pay enough taxes or enough for your gasoline?”. It should be cast in terms of food and milk for babies. Tell the people in the crowds that you aren’t going to stand by while the carbon taxes and gasoline taxes raise the cost of groceries. I’d also put together a whole slew of simple effective phrases that will continually cast doubt in the mind of the public where the silly claims and fears of global warming are concerned. Make it a fight. People will have a propensity to not want to believe anything that will raise their taxes and cost of gasoline. Don’t let the left get away with this big lie.


26 posted on 09/27/2007 10:39:11 AM PDT by Maelstorm (You must not just speak sense, your words must be crafted to resonate in the minds of morons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

What is the cure for Dingell?


27 posted on 09/27/2007 10:40:16 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jgilbert63

“How about before we soak Joe Middle Class with a huge tax increase, let’s first cut entitlement spending by 50% and cut Congressional salaries by 50%. Do that first, then we’ll talk about a gas tax increase.”

I like your way of thinking.


28 posted on 09/27/2007 10:42:16 AM PDT by hoe_cake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Good luck Buckwheat!


29 posted on 09/27/2007 10:45:19 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
TERM LIMITS

Needed to save the Republic from these damned lifetime political careerists.

Damn them all!

30 posted on 09/27/2007 10:47:49 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
There is a reason the Republicans are a minority and it has nothing to do with me or anyone else complaining about there actions. And to add to my whining, if they don’t get their heads out of their asses, they are going to be in the minority in 2008 with a dim president!
31 posted on 09/27/2007 10:53:18 AM PDT by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Gentlemen:

Please direct the congressterd to the following...

http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/


32 posted on 09/27/2007 10:54:31 AM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martinidon

Considering that the guy just released this you might want to allow the GOP candidates a little time to answer.

I would be very surprised if Thompson at least does not jump on this. And I would expect that most, if not all, the imprtant GOP candidates to hit this.


33 posted on 09/27/2007 10:56:14 AM PDT by scory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

You know, if we can’t turn this into a winning issue, there’s no hope left for the country.


34 posted on 09/27/2007 10:57:20 AM PDT by Marathoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

He can KISS my ***, I don’t get ANYTHING back by supposedly “reducing Global warming”. THis is just another liberal-spendthrift policy (probably to pay for another bloated government program).


35 posted on 09/27/2007 10:58:32 AM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"I'm trying to have everybody understand that this is going to cost and that it's going to have a measure of pain that you're not going to like,"

Fine. I have an idea. Resign fro the political trough and go back to where you came from and get a real job and pay for your own perks and maybe you'll get a clue how it feels to have a bunch of cavalier clowns like you pissing our money away faster than we can earn it

36 posted on 09/27/2007 11:00:49 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

All we need to do to fight global warming is get all that hot air out of Washington D C.


37 posted on 09/27/2007 11:03:27 AM PDT by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scory
If this were a Republican making this comment, Pelosi and Reid would have already had press releases out and the dims would be preparing their talking points for the MSM talking head news shows.
I will wait and see how the Republicans respond, but if past experience says anything it will be a long wait.....
38 posted on 09/27/2007 11:11:59 AM PDT by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

My husband and I talked about the GOP loss in
06.He was up in arms over the fact that the dems took control of congress and said he just KNOWS that the dems will take the WH in 08.
I told him then,”you worry too much. All you gotta do is just let the dems be,and they’ll spend so much time tripping over their own male-type organs that by the time election day comes,their own constituents-as well as those with a brain-will be so fed up with them,there’s no way they’ll get elected.”
The party’s moved even further into moonbat territory than they were during Clinton’s salad days,and too many folks will see that,and that will seal their fate.
I have faith. I’m NOT worried.They keep doing one horrendously stupid thing after another,and isn’t it delicious that they’re doing it now,right before we get to the really serious part of the election cycle?


39 posted on 09/27/2007 11:13:37 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Finally, Fred!...Welcome aboard!..Now,Go get 'em,boy!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I think this might be a poison pill - he does not want this increase because he is very much a “car company” guy. It is like lowering the blood alcohol level to .02. It looks like you REALLY care when in fact you just want nothing to be approved.


40 posted on 09/27/2007 11:13:52 AM PDT by xcullen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson