On CNN, O’Reilly Is ‘Ahmadinejad,’ Juan Williams, ‘Happy Negro’

NewsBusters.org ^ | 9/26/2007 | Matthew Balan

[Pyro7480]

Even after the Juan Williams "idiots at CNN" rebuke, CNN still pressed on about Bill O’Reilly’s race remarks, and a guest on Wednesday’s "Newsroom" took the language being used against O’Reilly and Williams to new lows. Syracuse University professor and blogger Boyce Watkins appeared on the CNN program, and compared O’Reilly to a murderous movie villain and to Iranian president Ahmadinejad. "If the villain in a movie comes up and says, 'I love you very much,' that usually means he wants to kill you. The fact is that Bill O'Reilly is a guy who has made a career demeaning, degrading, and devaluing every black institution he can get his hands on.... You know, he's about like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, when it comes to making ridiculous assertions and waiting for people to respond."

After his villain/Ahmadinejad comparison, Watkins blasted NPR host and Fox News contributor Juan Williams for coming to O’Reilly’s defense. O’Reilly’s race comments had come from an hour of his radio program that involved a segment with Williams. "Juan Williams sitting there, is sort of the 'Happy Negro' agreeing with Bill O'Reilly, doesn't impress me at all. A man cannot walk into your home and congratulate your mother for not being a prostitute and not expect you to be offended."

Video: Real (3.20 MB) or Windows (3.63 MB), plus MP3 (912 KB)

Boyce Watkins appeared with fellow blogger and NB contributor La Shawn Barber during the 10 am Eastern hour of "Newsroom." Prior to their segment, host Heidi Collins played a report by CNN correspondent Mary Snow, which recapped the whole O’Reilly "affair," including sound bites from CNN contributor Roland Martin (from an interview on "American Morning" in which Martin was critical of O’Reilly) and CNN host Rick Sanchez, who had talked to O’Reilly for a segment on his program.

Barber later took issue with the "Juan Williams is a Happy Negro" characterization by Watkins.

BARBER: You know, that the 'Happy Negro' comment about Juan Williams was totally uncalled for. That's the kind of ad hominem that we have to deal with....

WATKINS: (LAUGHS)

BARBER: And you know, these people are going to talk about O'Reilly and they're doing the same things. Put the man's comment in context. I'm not a Bill O'Reilly apologist. He does say outrageous things, but that's what he does. It's not that big a deal. It's really not that big a deal given the context ...

Boyce Watkins also went over-the-top in portraying Bill O’Reilly’s impact on race relations. Note how Heidi Collins does not challenge any of the previous statements Boyce Watkins made about O’Reilly.

COLLINS: Okay, so Boyce, so far, you've called him a villian and you've compared him to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Other people are comparing what he said to what Don Imus said about the Rutgers basketball team. Is that a fair comparison to you?

WATKINS: Well, I think it is. It is actually a fair comparison. It's only unfair to the extent that actually O'Reilly has done more damage than Imus. It's like comparing 9/11 to the Iraq War. More people have died in Iraq, but in 9/11, it was more traumatic, so people would consider that to be a more devastating event. Don Imus's clash sort of came all at once, where as O'Reilly's -- his pain has sort of been evolving through time, and I think he needs to be challenged and he needs to understand that people are going to come back at him if he makes these sort of offhand remarks about stereotypes in the black community. He may think he's complimenting us, but the fact is that it was an insult.

Earlier in the segment, Collins addressed the following questions to Barber. " La Shawn, what is this story about? Is this about race? Is this about the way things come across on television? Is this about a battle between CNN and Fox?" Barber’s answer:

BARBER: I think this is a lot of media-generated nonsense. I, personally, as a black person, wasn't offended by what O'Reilly said. If you actually listen and read his comments -- listen to and read his comments and context, it becomes clear that he and Juan Williams were talking about the violent, profanity-laced element of the gangster rap culture. And Bill O'Reilly was trying to make the point that people -- white people who don't know black people or aren't exposed to black people, may get the impression that gangster rap culture represents black Americans. Well, we know that's not true. So, he may have expressed it awkwardly. I have to admit that it was kind of an awkward way he said it, but it wasn't offensive to me, given the context in which he spoke.

"Media-generated nonsense" - that’s a good description of this whole affair.

Related: Barber's blog post about the intervew.

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.

[Pyro7480]

CNN is still trying to reach. Think what you may of O'Reilly, but this tactic of the Left MUST BE RESISTED.

[Pyro7480]

Huh??

[roses of sharon]

Wow, I hope CNN doesn’t actually pay its on-air racists to vent hysterically.

Hope no kids saw this political porn.

[DoughtyOne]

I am not a big O’Reilly fan, but this is just nonsense. It’s so sad that some people act like this. You wish it wouldn’t, but it really contributes to a skewed view.

Some blacks are idiots. Some whites are idiots. Not all blacks or all whites are idiots.

This black, is an idiot. He is a disgrace to humankind, not any specific group. Jessie and Al belong right beside him.

I wish CNN would refrain from giving wing nuts like this a platform from which to utter nonsense.

[Dallas]

and Juan’s response was http://www.foxnews.com/oreilly/index.html

[DoughtyOne]

I do not always agree with Juan Williams, in fact I disagree with him quite stridently not all that infrequently, but to describe him as this person did, is truly vile.

[MrB]

O’Reilly is a target of the left because he exposes them, and exposure will defeat them, because the public at large will not stand for their agenda.

Too bad he felt he had to “balance” his viewpoint with an unwarranted attack on Freerepublic.

[L98Fiero]

“Media-generated nonsense” - that’s a good description of this whole affair.

Every bit of it can be traced back to embarrassing these same people over the Duke LAX incident. The REAL racism in this country was laid bare for a whole nation to see.

That’s what the Imus deal was about. I’m convinced if the Duke thing had not happened, Imus’ comment would have gone unnoticed. Gotta get the focus back on racist whitey. It worked. Now there’s blood in the water. Jena, O’Reilly, it’s all because of the Duke fiasco. They HAVE to find something good that will stick.

[Rennes Templar]

I saw OR last night. It is dangerous what CNN is doing. How can we believe anything they say?

[ishabibble]

I saw this segment. Professor Watkins is a complete a@@clown. He dislikes BOR for past imagined grievances, so this setup was perfect for him.

Is anyone else wondering where Big Al Sharpton is, and when will he be stepping up with his mighty voice to condemn this shameless race huckstering? After all, he is an eyewitness to the entire restaurant luncheon, so where in the world is REV. Al Sharpton?

BOR TRIED to mess with Free Republic, and it didn’t work. He backed off more because he didn’t realize the magnitude of the Kos Kidz blind hatred than because he was wrong about this site, IMHO. That said, I think this thing is more Jena 6 fallout, and besides the various teen beatings by packs of black kids who are all stirred up by the Big Al and Jesse, and if it doesn’t stop now there will be endless 24/7 aggrieved race hustlers in the next few weeks. Stop the madness!! Bill didn’t say anything wrong!

[don-o]

[L98Fiero]

“Too bad he felt he had to “balance” his viewpoint with an unwarranted attack on Freerepublic.”

“Unwarrated?”

You are delusional. In my 4.5 years, I’ve seen literally thousands of posts bashing O’Reilly. My guess is the ratio of negative to positive posts would be something like 99/1.

Unwarranted, my butt.

[Paulus Invictus]

I was stuck in the doctor’s waiting room for more than an hour yesterday and they had CNN on their TV with the volume up. I could scarcely believe the hate-Bush tripe and leftist anger I heard from the talking heads- all libs. It’s truly the Commie News Network, no doubt about it!

[Enchante]

"It is actually a fair comparison. It's only unfair to the extent that actually O'Reilly has done more damage than Imus. It's like comparing 9/11 to the Iraq War."

This buffoon is a college professor??? Heaven help us all, please save Americans from our politically correct idiots!! How dare he bring up 9/11 and a WAR overseas in talking about Imus and O'Reilly..... did this guy actually get above 200s (the minimum possible) on his SATs, or how did such a bozo get through college and graduate school?

[moonman]

Thanks for the link. Simply ... AMAZING!

[bray]

"Juan Williams sitting there, is sort of the 'Happy Negro' agreeing with Bill O'Reilly, doesn't impress me at all."

Pot/Kettle/Black. Notice how the Stalinists thugs are afraid to have an honest discussion about race??

Pray for W and Our Troops

[kbennkc]

Mr. Falafel pervert slandering phony demagogue will not find much help from the right .

[SolidWood]

BOR can try to defend himself. I don’t give a crock for him anymore. He is a blowhard populist, not a conservative. His attacks on Freerepublic were just the topping.