Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson on the Issues
Bella Online, The Voice of Women ^ | September 24, 2007 | Linda Sue Grimes

Posted on 09/24/2007 2:10:01 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The following is a summary of Thompson’s views on the issues of National Security, Federal Budget and Spending/Budgetary Reform, Tax Reform, Healthcare, Government Effectiveness, Building Strong Families, Immigration, Education, Appointment of Judges, Energy Security, and the Second Amendment.

National Security

In a post 9/11 world, Thompson recognizes the need for America to increase its ability to defeat its terrorist enemies. Therefore, his plans include upscaling the military, improving the missile defense system, enhancing the intelligence community, making homeland security robust enough to protect America from terrorists worldwide, giving backbone the judicial system so it will face the reality of terrorism and unlawful enemy combatants.

Federal Budget and Spending/Budgetary Reform

To ease the burden that threatens future generations of Americans, Thompson plans to make the government’s fiscal records transparent so everyone can understand clearly the impending crisis, devise a comprehensive plan including all political views to help solve the crisis, cut wasteful spending, “to safeguard our security, promote our prosperity, and protect our children and grandchildren from fiscal calamity.”

Tax Reform

Thompson anticipates a full renovation the U.S. Tax code by dissolving the IRS “as we know it.” He wants to devise a “[f]undamental tax reform built on the principles of simplicity, fairness, and growth.” He envisions a tax code that lightens the tax burden on U.S. citizens while at the same time boosts U.S. competitiveness worldwide.

Healthcare

Even though American healthcare is the world’s best, some Americans opt not to have medical insurance, and others cannot afford it. Thompson believes that everyone who wants it should be able to acquire appropriate medical coverage. He realizes that there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution to healthcare and insurance coverage. He offers a five part solution to the problem: make available information and opportunities that allow individuals to choose the medical care options that best suit them and their families, create a system that actually improves the health of every American by bolstering “cost-effective prevention, chronic-care management, and personal responsibility,” update current administration and delivery by fostering “best practices,” emphasize free-market solutions, support and promote more research in medicine and life-science.

Government Effectiveness

Thompson realizes that current government practices are inefficient and wasteful. He plans to correct this deficiency by placing only the best qualified people in place and then allowing him proper “authority and resources” to their jobs, repair government accounting, making it more transparent, holding agencies accountable, and securing information technologies.

Building Strong Families

Fred Thompson believes that families are the “bedrock of our nation and our culture.” He wants to strengthen the institutions of family and marriage by encouraging policies that promote “a culture of life” and “advance the freedom of religion,” return to state governments authority for protecting families to eliminate intrusion by the federal government and the judiciary, fight obscenity in the media by allowing parents better control and the ability to “exercise their responsibilities.”

Immigration

In a post 9/11 world, immigration has become a security issue. Thompson believes a nation has the responsibility to determine who enters. He therefore plans to secure the borders and enforce immigration laws and end “sanctuary cities,” make sure that existing immigration laws actually benefit our national interest, promote unity by welcoming legal immigration, promoting the English language, encouraging assimilation so that legal immigrants may become productive citizens.

Education

Thompson recognizes the importance of education for a democracy and despite the fact that billions of dollars has been poured in the education systems, our schools are not performing well enough. He wants to lessen the bureaucracy and give parents more choices of schools, reduce federal mandates and return moneys to the state, encourage vouchers, charter schools, and foster competition and choice to improve schools, encourage teachers and students to study science, technology, engineering, and math, because these fields are crucial not only for prosperity but also for security in a post 9/11 world; he is also committed to “Promoting transparency to assess performance, promote accountability, and share innovations in education at all levels.”

Appointing Judges Faithful To Our Constitution

Because activist judges have been responsible for bringing about a “culture of abortion” and have been attempting to redefine and weaken marriage, which undermines families, Thompson intends to appoint only “strict constructionist judges who will interpret the law, not impose their views on us by legislating from the bench.”

Energy Security

Because dependence on foreign energy sources threatens our national and economic security, Thompson plans to seek a “balanced approach to energy security that increases domestic supplies, reduces demand for oil and gas, and promotes alternative fuels and other diverse energy sources,” encourage non-fossil fuel research, promote policies that enhance energy efficiency, and encourage research and development to improve the environment and lower C02 levels.

Second Amendment

Thompson strongly supports the protection of an individual’s right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the second amendment of the Constitution. He therefore is committed to protecting the individual’s right while “strictly enforcing existing laws and severely punishing violent criminals.”

For more information, please visit: Fred ’08


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Tennessee; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aliens; alternativefuels; banglist; budgetaryreform; conservatism; defense; education; electionpresident; elections; energysecurity; federalism; firstprinciples; fred; fredthompson; gop; healthcare; homelandsecurity; immigrantlist; immigration; intelligence; issues; judges; judiciary; medicine; nochildleftbehind; republicans; rtkba; sanctuarycities; scotus; secondamendment; securetheborders; taxes; taxreform; terrorism; terrorists; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: SuziQ; EternalVigilance

“Oh, Fred knows the difference, but he knows he’s speaking to some folks who wouldn’t know a constitutional republic if it bit them in the butt. He’s speaking to folks exactly where they are, ...”

So he’s insulting us by talking down to us? ... Please stop. You are digging the hole deeper.

“and they seem to like him.”
I would like him better if he had precision and accuracy in his pronouncements, and I’m sure the folks who supposedly wouldn’t know better wouldn’t mind it either.


41 posted on 09/24/2007 11:08:57 PM PDT by WOSG (I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

He’s not ‘talking down’ to anyone, he’s simply meeting some folks where they are. Are you denying that most folks don’t know the difference between a democracy and a representative republic? Just having someone as a candidate who talks up Federalism will go a long way towards educating voters. That’s a great thing!


42 posted on 09/24/2007 11:38:31 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"And while we don’t know for certain how or why climate change is occurring,
it makes sense to take reasonable steps to reduce CO2 emissions without harming our economy. "

SAY IT AIN'T SO, FRED! (Dispatch Inhofe, post haste.)

43 posted on 09/25/2007 12:06:14 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Rather than assume Thompson supports Fair Tax, it would be better to have quotes of Thompson himself stating his position on the FAIR Tax. has he made a statement clearly on this?

You are misreading my statement in post #5. "The Fair Tax Act Of 2007 (H.R.25/S.1025) that is currently before Congress addresses these very points. Fair Tax ping! ". It is a fact the points he outlines for tax reform match those features found in the Fair Tax. Regardless of that fact Thompson wrote the following letter to Americans For fair Taxation Chairman Leo Linbeck Jr.:

"Dear Leo:

I've appreciated seeing the Fair Tax folks when I'm out on the road, as well as their enthusiasm when they've come to my events. Although I wish they'd get my good side when they roll their cameras!

My staff and I have been working with Americans for Fair Taxation for some time now. We share the same belief that the next President should enact a fundamental overhaul of the tax code that makes it fairer, simpler, and more pro-growth. There are a number of ways to do that, and over the years I've looked at many of them. Congress must begin a serious consideration of real fundamental tax reform, rather than nibbling around the edges. I think the principles and ideas found in the Fair Tax are a good place to start, particularly given the grassroots support it enjoys across the country. Good luck in Iowa this weekend!

Regards,
Fred Thompson


Some people argue this is not an endorsement of The Fair Tax but there are three key points in the letter that prove otherwise. 1) Fred stating he and his staff have been working extensively with American For Fair Taxation. 2) The principles in his remarks on tax reform "principles of simplicity, fairness, and growth" exactly match those in those principles stated in his letter to Leo Linbeck. 3) His support for the principles in The Fair Tax.

The principles are the core of The Fair Tax. Therefore it would be impossible not to support The Fair Tax while supporting those principles. Some also argue it is possible to maintain only some of the elements in The Fair Tax while discarding the rest of the bill. It would no longer be The Fair Tax Act Of 2007(HR) and defeat the whole purpose of the bill. Sponsor Congressman John Linder and many Fair Tax leaders have stated the bill must pass without change.
44 posted on 09/25/2007 4:26:06 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: webboy45; 2ndDivisionVet
"Where are the details? How is he going to enforce the immigrant laws? What will he do differently? What kind of tax is he talking about that gets rid of the IRS and makes US products more competitive? Details, details, details!"

I agree! I like Fred Thompson as a person. And I believe he will be the GOP candidate next year and will beat Clinton BUT I want some SPECIFICS! Thompson needs to come forward with what "webboy45" calls "details!" I'm tired of politicians speaking rhetoric. I want to know details and specifics too!
45 posted on 09/25/2007 10:56:17 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ; EternalVigilance; webboy45

“Fred could talk about specifics all day, but that doesn’t mean what he wants done will get done.”

OR ... he can’t talk vague happy talk about dissolving the IRS without telling us exactly how taxes are to be cut, and thereby avoid *any* accountability to actually achieving anything!!!

Nice job if you can get it.

“The President is not a dictator, and he doesn’t file legislation.”
On the contrary, some of our most successful legislation has been crafted with the executive branch’s input, including specific legislation.

It was the “Reagan Tax Cuts” and “Bush Tax Cuts” because they were there in the trenches asking for *specific provisions*.


46 posted on 10/02/2007 11:24:17 PM PDT by WOSG (I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

“He’s not ‘talking down’ to anyone, he’s simply meeting some folks where they are. Are you denying that most folks don’t know the difference between a democracy and a representative republic?”

‘where they are’? I’m in Texas. I am denying that he needs to be patronizing like that. I dont see other GOP candidates doing that. That’s the kind of junk Al Gore would pull, talking to us like 5th graders. That would be a big phony act if true, and we don’t need phony candidates.


47 posted on 10/02/2007 11:36:15 PM PDT by WOSG (I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
‘where they are’? I’m in Texas. I am denying that he needs to be patronizing like that. I dont see other GOP candidates doing that.

Congratulations on being a savvy citizen! Most FReepers, are. However, as several threads on FR in the last week have shown, many are not, and they do need to be educated about this country. I'm glad Fred is doing this, and with his speaking style, they won't think they're being 'talked down to', as they might if they were being spoken to by Her Heinous. But then, she wouldn't be trying to educate any of them anyway; it's in her best interest to keep them uninformed.

48 posted on 10/03/2007 7:19:52 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson