Posted on 09/22/2007 8:46:03 PM PDT by monomaniac
By Steve Jalsevac
September 19, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - There has been growing concern over the past several years about increasingly aggressive measures undertaken to harvest human organs from dying patients. Dr. John Shea, a Toronto physician who has specialized in researching the issue, has just completed a report, Organ donation: The inconvenient truth, that sounds an alarm about the unethical or at least highly questionable practices of the organ transplant industry. The article is published in the September issue of Catholic Insight magazine.
The magazine editor states the article is offered to inform the public about "the moral principles and scientific facts pertaining to both the donation and harvesting of human organs for transplantation purposes. Many physicians have serious and well-considered concerns about the morality of human organ transplantation and about the fact that the general public has not been properly informed about what really happens when organs are retrieved."
Dr. Shea reports on the modern and still very unsettled definition of "brain death" used by many organ transplant physicians to justify declaring organ donors dead and therefore fair game for immediate organ harvesting .
Shea points out, "There is no consensus on diagnostic criteria for brain death. They are the subject of intense international debate. Various sets of neurological criteria for the diagnosis of brain death are used. A person could be diagnosed as brain dead if one set is used and not be diagnosed as brain dead if another is used." It depends on what hospital or which doctor is involved in a particular case.
In fact, says Shea, "A diagnosis of death by neurological criteria is theory, not scientific fact. Also, irreversibility of neurological function is a prognosis, not a medically observable fact."
The coldly utilitarian goal of promoting the acceptance of brain death, says Shea, "is to move to a society where people see organ donation as a social responsibility and where donating organs would be accepted as a normal part of dying." In fact, he says, the specific wishes of a donor opposed to having his organs removed would be bypassed by putting skilled pressure on surviving family members to approve the organ removal.
The apnea test, or removal of a ventilator, that is often used to determine brain death, says Dr. Shea, is the thing that often ends up killing the patient. "The test", he reports, "significantly impairs the possibility of recovery and can lead to the death of the patient through a heart attack or irreversible brain damage."
Shea reveals there are some preventive measures taken by organ removal teams that bring in to serious question whether their donor body, kept functioning through artificial means to preserve the organs, is really, fully dead.
"Some form of anesthesia is needed to prevent the donor from moving during removal of the organs. The donor's blood pressure may rise during surgical removal. Similar changes take place during ordinary surgical procedures only if the depth of anesthesia is inadequate. Body movement and a rise in blood pressure are due to the skin incision and surgical procedure if the donor is not anesthetized. Is it not reasonable to consider that the donor may feel pain? In some cases, drugs to paralyze muscle contraction are given to prevent the donor from moving during removal of the organs. Yet, sometimes no anesthesia is administered to the donor. Movement by the donor is distressing to doctors and nurses. Perhaps this is another reason why anesthesia and drugs to paralyze the muscles are usually given."
Since the definition of brain death was invented in the late 1960s "as a means for the moral validation of the retrieval of human organs for transplant", says Shea, the demand for organs has increasingly exceeded supply and so a new definitions of death had to be created to help meet the demand. The concept of "cardiac death" was developed but this also has serious ethical challenges and test measures that also kill a possibly still alive patient.
Another "ominous and disturbing development" is the recent recruitment of palliative caregivers by the organ harvesting industry. "Those care givers" says Shea, "in effect… are to be the agents of a soft-sell program to make the family 'feel comfortable and supported during this extremely difficult time.'"
Shea covers the changing Vatican debate on these end of life issues and the need for more definitive and better informed direction from the Church on the issues. An Italian researcher is quoted stating, "The concern of many is that the Vatican has not taken the appropriate position when doubts exist about the end of human life."
Organ donation: The inconvenient truth contains many references to support its statements and is a timely paper on the human transplant trend that is fast becoming ethically out-of-control. Many political jurisdictions are considering radical legislative measures, such as presumed consent, without being fully aware of the major ethical dilemmas related to organ transplants. Most are not aware, for instance, that organs are often taken from persons who are likely, in many ways, still alive.
To view the complete article, Organ donation: The inconvenient truth:
http://catholicinsight.com/online/bioethics/article_747.shtml ; HTML version
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007_docs/Organdonationinconvenienttruth.pdf ; pdf version
See related LifeSiteNews articles:
More Hospitals/Governments Push For Organ Transplants 5 Minutes or Less After Heart Stops
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/aug/06080808.html
Organ Transplant Doctor Investigated in Non-Heart Beating Donation Case
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/mar/07030903.html
Surgical Preparation For Organ Donation For Non-Brain Dead Patients?: Australia
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jul/06071305.html
UK Chief Medical Officer Pushes for Automatic Organ Donation
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07071702.html
Ontario NDP Introduces Organ Donor Bill Which Presumes Consent of all Dying
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/feb/06021602.html
Deaths now Automatically Reported to Organ Donation Program
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/mar/06032303.html
Organ Donation after Cardiac Death a Danger to Critical Patients ~ Medical Professor
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/oct/06101008.html
Great post. Exactly the reason why I haven’t signed the organ donor part of my driver’s license.
I have no problem donating my organs... I just don’t want any celebrities or politicians getting them.
I have no problem donating my organs... I just don’t want any celebrities or politicians getting them.I wouldn't either, as I long as I could be sure they were being taken after I was dead.
This issue will be rapidly eclipsed by the growing of organs from one's own tissue, which would solve the immense problem of rejection as well as all related ethical concerns.
Credit utilitarian ethics and genius for that, as wrongly as one might attribute bad donor practices to the same convenient scapegoat.
Only the families and the victim "donate" - the hospitals and doctors get exorbitant amounts of money. Cut the money down to the lowest level where it just pays the actual costs - and people will be safer.
Just not signing your license may not protect you. They are trying to push through 'presumed' clauses that if you don't actually state NO, they will pressure the family and they know just how to take advantage and play on these peoples emotions in their greatest distress.
If someone wants to donate, then there should be a separate card specifying that. That would be just as easy to sign for those wishing to take the chance.
No card - hands off.
Urgh... thanks for the heads up. I think I’ll write “NO ORGAN DONATION” in sharpie all over my driver’s license in the meantime.
Prudent
Just in time for Haloween too!
This article would be incomplete without including the Communist Chinese theory on organ donation.
In Communist China, if a person is a prisoner or a protester (sorry to repeat myself), they are frequently sent to a Doctor for a routine check-up. During the check-up, they are given medication to relax them. After they are knocked out, they are taken to an operating room. Perhaps they always wanted to go to America...well, their kidney will.
Exactly!!
You know, it is amazing how much bullshit that the ‘experts/ try to fed you that you will wind up not swallowing if you just apply a few Biblical principles to the issue.
Oh, but you could be famous if Teddy Kennedy got your liver.
read
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.