Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/21/2007 11:20:56 AM PDT by HoosierGirl25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HoosierGirl25

The problem of course is that government believes all its citizens are criminals.


2 posted on 09/21/2007 11:23:08 AM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25
people have a right to protect themselves in their home.

But apparently not outside it.

3 posted on 09/21/2007 11:23:56 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25

You can’t have it both ways Rudy, stfu.


4 posted on 09/21/2007 11:24:57 AM PDT by stm (Fred Thompson in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25

Rudy pro gun????

R O T F L M A O !!!!


5 posted on 09/21/2007 11:27:51 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25

Gee, I guess he flip flopped on this issue. He sure didn’t believe NYC residents had the right to own firearms and protect themselves. What a putz, I wouldn’t vote for this guy for dog catcher let alone President.


6 posted on 09/21/2007 11:28:16 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25
“A person’s home is their castle…[and] people have a right to protect themselves in their home. It’s a right they should have,” he said.

If it's all the same to you Rudy, I'll reserve the right to protect myself anywhere I go.

8 posted on 09/21/2007 11:29:27 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25
Giuliani said that gun rights improved under President Bush and guaranteed that they will continue to improve even more if he becomes President.

Gotta hike the cuffs of my pants up . . . the bullsh!t is getting deep around here.

10 posted on 09/21/2007 11:34:44 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25

I haven’t yet forgiven W for promising to sign an AWB, why should Rudy expect me to trust him after all the damage he inflicted on The Constitution? Rudy needs to go back to New York and put his money where his mouth is. He could start by shutting Bloomie up.


11 posted on 09/21/2007 11:35:48 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25

Blow us gun-owners a kiss, Rudolph.
We likes a li’l kiss when our peters is bein’ pulled.


13 posted on 09/21/2007 11:55:25 AM PDT by tumblindice (Hey Pedro: here's your sombrero! What's your hurry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25

Sorry, I don’t tuust you with my guns there Rudy.


15 posted on 09/21/2007 12:06:22 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25

My BULLSH*T meter is pegged in the red arc.How ‘bout yall?


17 posted on 09/21/2007 12:24:39 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25
Rudy was in NY when he was against guns and if any of you ever lived there you would understand, a lot to ask for now a days here at fred'srepublic.com

Still, he is a firm believer in states right and personal rights and as President he would defend our right to the 2 amendment.....

Go Rudy Go

25 posted on 09/21/2007 2:40:39 PM PDT by The Wizard (DemonRATS: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25
Cato Daily Dispatch

In "Individual Ruling: D.C. Gun Ban Goes Down," Cato senior fellow Robert Levy writes: "The Constitution forecloses an outright ban on handguns. Ergo, if we Americans decide that a ban is required for public safety, we must change the Constitution. We cannot simply ignore the constitutional provision and act as though the document did not exist. That's a recipe for lawlessness and mob rule. As a nation, we have chosen to have a written Constitution for good reason, and it has served us well for more than two centuries."

27 posted on 09/21/2007 4:31:39 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25

Here's the "gun owners' friend" in action

32 posted on 09/24/2007 8:37:52 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierGirl25

NYC effete elites trying desperatly to rehabilitate their candidate. (their girl?)

This is as pathetic as his cell phone set up.


33 posted on 09/24/2007 8:38:22 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson