Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HoosierGirl25

Gee, I guess he flip flopped on this issue. He sure didn’t believe NYC residents had the right to own firearms and protect themselves. What a putz, I wouldn’t vote for this guy for dog catcher let alone President.


6 posted on 09/21/2007 11:28:16 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: calex59

He knew it was impossible for anyone to get elected in NYC without championing the cause of “more gun control”. It’s pathetic, but that’s the position of about 99% of NYC voters. As a result the law-abiding among them wouldn’t arm themselves anyway, even if the state and local laws explicitly allowed them to. When a population has that kind of mindset, the prospect that “only the criminals will have guns” isn’t dependent on the gun laws, it’s a foregone conclusion regardless of the gun laws. Over the long term, that mindset is changeable, but not in the time frame of any political office term.


12 posted on 09/21/2007 11:42:36 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson