Posted on 09/19/2007 3:11:52 PM PDT by goldstategop
The only "crisis" in health care in this country is that doctors are paid too little. (Also they've come up with nothing to help that poor Dennis Kucinich.)
But the Democratic Party treats doctors like they're Klan members. They wail about how much doctors are paid and celebrate the trial lawyers who do absolutely nothing to make society better, but swoop in and steal from the most valuable members of society.
Maybe doctors could get the Democrats to like them if they started suing their patients.
It's only a matter of time before the best and brightest students forget about medical school and go to law school instead. How long can a society based on suing the productive last?
You can make 30 times as much money as doctors by becoming a trial lawyer suing doctors. You need no skills, no superior board scores, no decade of training and no sleepless residency. But you must have the morals of a drug dealer. (And the bank wire transfer number to the Democratic National Committee.)
The editors of The New York Times have been engaging in a spirited debate with their readers over whether doctors are wildly overpaid or just hugely overpaid. The results of this debate are available on TimeSelect, for just $49.95.
"Many health care economists," the Times editorialized, say the partisan wrangling over health care masks a bigger problem: "the relatively high salaries paid to American doctors."
Citing the Rand Corp., the Times noted that doctors in the U.S. "earn two to three times as much as they do in other industrialized countries." American doctors earn about $200,000 to $300,000 a year, while European doctors make $60,000 to $120,000. Why, that's barely enough for Muslim doctors in Britain to buy plastic explosives to blow up airplanes!
How much does Pinch Sulzberger make for driving The New York Times stock to an all-time low? Probably a lot more than your podiatrist.
In college, my roommate was in the chemistry lab Friday and Saturday nights while I was dancing on tables at the Chapter House. A few years later, she was working 20-hour days as a resident at Mount Sinai doing liver transplants while I was frequenting popular Upper East Side drinking establishments. She was going to Johns Hopkins for yet more medical training while I was skiing and following the Grateful Dead. Now she vacations in places like Rwanda and Darfur with Doctors Without Borders while I'm going to Paris.
(Has anyone else noticed the nonexistence of a charitable organization known as "Lawyers Without Borders"?)
She makes $380 for an emergency appendectomy, or one-ten-thousandth of what John Edwards made suing doctors like her, and one-fourth of what John Edwards' hairdresser makes for a single shag cut.
Edwards made $30 million bringing nonsense lawsuits based on junk science against doctors. To defend themselves from parasites like Edwards, doctors now pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical malpractice insurance every year.
But as the Times would note, doctors in Burkina Faso only get $25 and one goat per year.
As long as we're studying the health care systems of various socialist countries, are we allowed to notice that doctors in these other countries aren't constantly being sued by bottom-feeding trial lawyers stealing one-third of the income of people performing useful work like saving lives?
But the Democrats (and Fred Thompson) refuse to enact tort reform legislation to rein in these charlatans. After teachers and welfare recipients, the Democrats' most prized constituency is trial lawyers. The ultimate Democrat constituent would be a public schoolteacher on welfare who needed an abortion and was suing her doctor.
Doctors graduate at the top of their classes at college and then spend nearly a decade in grueling work at medical schools. Most doctors don't make a dime until they're in their early 30s, just in time to start paying off their six-figure student loans by saving people's lives. They have 10 times the IQ of trial lawyers and 1,000 times the character.
Yeah, let's go after those guys. On to nuns next!
But Times' readers responded to the editorial about doctors being overpaid with a slew of indignant letters -- not at the Times for making such an idiotic argument, but at doctors who earn an average of $200,000 per year. Letter writers praised the free medical care in places like Spain. ("Nightmare" in the Ann Coulter dictionary is defined as "having a medical emergency in Spain.")
One letter-writer proposed helping doctors by having the government take over another aspect of the economy -- the cost of medical education:
"If we are to restructure the system by which we pay doctors to match Europe, which seems prudent as well as inevitable, we must also finance education as Europeans do, by using state dollars to finance the full or majority cost of higher education, including professional school."
And then to reduce the cost of medical school, the government could finance "the full or majority cost" of construction costs of medical schools, and "the full or majority cost" of the trucks that bring the cement to the construction site and the "the full or majority cost" of coffee that the truck drivers drink while hauling the cement and ... it makes my head hurt.
I may have to see a doctor about this. I should probably get on the waiting list now in case Hillary gets elected.
That's how liberals think: To fix an industry bedeviled by government controls, we'll spread the coercion to yet more industries!
The only sane letter on the matter, I'm happy to report, came from the charming town of New Canaan, Conn., which means that I am not the only normal person who still reads the Times. Ray Groves wrote:
"Last week, I had the annual checkup for my 2000 Taurus. I paid $95 per hour for much needed body work. Next month, when I have my own annual physical, I expect and hope to pay a much higher rate to my primary care internist, who has spent a significant portion of his life training to achieve his position of responsibility."
There is nothing more to say.
I agree with you about increasing the supply. But you paint a slightly more dire version of life as a doctor. They get to start living large in their 30's, not 40's. Sure they are paying back debt, but remember, the ability to borrow to buy a house is based on instantaneous income. I have several friends who are real estate agents who have sold really nice big houses to doctors in their early 30's...and yes, surgeons and other doctors who have to spend more years in school too.
But then, if y'all are consistant, you'd have to start calling him a "flip-flopper."
During my first divorce, my wife’s lawyer had a clear conflict of interest when he represented her. When I called the Mississippi Bar Association to make a complaint about his representation of her, they sent me a ten page complaint form and required me to obtain a lawyer to make a complaint. I then had a very difficult time finding a lawyer to take the case. Frustration and the lack of funds finally beat me down. What does it take to make a complaint against a physician? How easy is it to sue a doctor, a veterinarian, or anyone else...? A helluva lot easier than it is to prosecute a lawyer for conflict of interest, ethics violations and malpractice...Every time one loses a case, the lawyer that represents the person should be liable for malpractice because if the lawyer had done his job well, the person would have won their case....what is different between that and a physician’s case?
You folks are paying twice the necessary cost of health insurance in order to pay the doctors insurance bills.
What a waste of money.
You are all just paying the lawyers.
We, in Canada, OTOH, are paying 3 times the cost necessary in order to fund the unions.
Sigh.
Ann- you ROCK, girl! Still my hero!
This is a common problem today....they don't care if the client wins or loses, as long as they get paid.
I had to deal with a person like that a few weeks ago. He told me he had been hired to do a certain thing. When I told him it couldn't be done, he replied that he didn't really care. As long as the client was willing to pay him to try to make it work, he would continue to take the clients money.
or, forgive me for this statement, if people started paying attention in school, disregarded the propoganda thrown at them, and as they sat on juries, stopped with the stupid judgements and outrageous awards, this crap would stop. the government is not the whole problem, nor is it the answer to the problem....we the people have to take the country back.....bottom line
“How long can a society based on suing the productive last?”
Amen, Sistah! :)
I had an argument with a liberal friend concerning doctor’s salaries v. lawyers, pro ball players, entertainers.
Here’s the liberal reasoning.
Doctors are necessary to society, therefore they should be modestly paid because we are a captive to their trade.
On the other hand, ballplayers, entertainers, lawyers are NOT a necessity, therefore they should be able to charge whatever the traffic will bear.
Bass Ackwards!
no need for forgiveness, that was well-said. Juries are dumb enough to buy what John Edwards and the like are selling. Sad.
Is There A Trial Lawyer In The House? (Ann Coulter Slams Her Own Profession Alert)
Posted by goldstategop
On News/Activism 09/19/2007 3:11:52 PM PDT · 52 replies
Ann Coulter.com ^ | 09/19/2007 | Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter: Is there a trial lawyer in the House?
Posted by JWR_Editor
On News/Activism 09/19/2007 2:50:57 PM PDT · 32 replies
JewishWorldReview.com ^ | Sept. 19, 2007 | Ann Coulter
Indexing RELATED threads...JWR_Editor may have posted HIS thread a few minutes earlier than YOU did...
...but YOU posted Ann's column from HER website......and I understand that she REALLY likes it when you do that! :o)
“You folks are paying twice the necessary cost of health insurance in order to pay the doctors insurance bills.
What a waste of money.”
Seems the insurance companys got quite a scam going.
companies...whoops
What if doctors refused to treat lawyers...?
we’d get sued, what else?
add the AMA to that list - I am proudly NOT a member
I fear we'll find out - probably sooner than later...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
