Posted on 09/19/2007 5:40:34 AM PDT by coca-cola kid
Saying that you didn’t get an answer. Asking what has he done when working in committees is actually something that you do. It is doing something although I know you won’t agree with that. He has done more than just work on committees and you were given several things that he has DONE which does not involve committee work.
He speaks to many issues, he isn’t a single issue candidate. He has done many things.
I’m not going to bother to type them out, because even if I do you will say I said nothing at all. Which is what you just did in post #12.
Have you read what Jim Robinson has said about Rudy Guiliani, have you read the Guiliani truth file? I have a file of some of Jim’s posts if you would like to read them. These are from today, and there are more going back several months.
There was this one:
To: Eagles Talon IV
I don’t know, but if you are promoting a known gun grabbing, abortion “rights” supporting, gay “rights” supporting, sanctuary city creating liberal, you’re definitely placing your conservative credentials in grave jeopardy.
105 posted on 09/19/2007 7:58:29 AM CDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
And this one:
To: Eagles Talon IV
No. Flat out no. Rudy is an abortionist liberal. He’s disqualified from any consideration whatsoever to run on a conservative ticket. As I’ve already told you, FR is a conservative site and we will not be wasting our time or resources on liberal abortionist pigs. If you wish to promote liberal abortionist pigs, please do it elsewhere. Hope I’m being crystal clear on this matter. Don’t want to be ambiguous.
124 posted on 09/19/2007 8:13:52 AM CDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
There are others that Jim Robinson has posted about Fred, and thinks Fred is a conservative.
So you say you believe you are a conservative and support Rudy? I agree with the owner of this website about that.
You were given an answer about what Fred has done. You are not worth the time it takes to type anything. You are a liar. And I can find the posts to prove you were given an answer. As far as you are concerned that is a waste of bandwidth.
“I guess I’m only a conservative if I agree with you.” Nope, that’s not the definition. But this is a conservative website and you don’t agree with the owner of the website who has given his own definition.
It’s all part of Fred’s plan (whatever that might be).
I received an “answer”....but I was asking for specific achievements supporters point to, and was merely given a cut and paste of his resume.
That is certainly NOT an answer to the question I was asking.
This just proves that the debates are scared of Thompson. ;)
Thank you for injecting some perspective, I remember there were a lot of nasty things said about George W. back during the Primaries, but once he got the nomination, the vast majority rallied their support around him.
I join with you and many others that will never vote for RUBY G. or any other gun grabbers. That will include: MUTT ROMNEY,PORTAJOHN McVAIN and ROT PAULINE, etal.
.
I’d be worried, too, if someone was catching up to my boy in one of the states he was counting on to win (New Hampshire). Keep on posting these threads, it sure is helping the Mittwits feel good about themselves. Hahahaha!
Rudy McRomney can’t beat Hillary...
If this is the worst mistake he’s made to date, he’s in good shape.
You were given more than that.
My husband gave me some good advice, don’t bother trying to talk/post to stupid people. Waste of time says my husband. He’s a wise man.
If FREd showed up there’d be a debate. ABC should keep their options open.
This is a heck of time to be telling Fred.
If it is in place, then why does your boy deliberately choose to ignore it? I'm sure you'd agree that Rudy is not too dumb to not understand the plain English it's written in.
As a huge Fred supporter (donations made, bumpersticker on the car, proselytizing to friends and family) the last thing I want to see is Fred’s supporters morph into the nasty little clowns the Romney/Hunter fans have become. Personally, I find the petty tyranny of your “Ooh, ooh. I’m gonna tell Jim!” post extremely off-putting.
Giuliani very publicly returned a big check from the Saudis on behalf of 9/11 victims...but later quietly accepted big checks from the Saudis when they were written out to his own company.
This is just a posting planted by a Rudi or Romney supporter to smear Fred. I bet that Tompkins guy is at the bottom of this!
Re: but later quietly accepted big checks from the Saudis when they were written out to his own company.
Let’s see the links and proof then.
It must have been very quiet, as nary a link is to be found:
“The “debates” we’ve been subjected to so far are nothing more than dog-and-pony shows, with serious candidates vying with a gaggle of no-chancers, trying to one-up each other with cute, 30-second sound bites.”
Yeah, they just need Fred’s participation in order for them to be credible events.
His stance on guns? There is a 2nd Amendment in place and that isn’t changing anytime soon
Unless you have a sufficiently liberal congress pass a bill restricting the 2nd amendment in a way like requiring microstamping of bullet casings, expanding the assault weapons ban to include any firearm not specifically used for hunting or sport or some similar foolishness. If you have a POTUS in office who has a past history of restricting gun ownership and sueing gun manufacturers across state lines eager to “comprimise” in order to get cooperation for his initiatives then the 2nd amendment could change very significantly.
This is exactly the concern most thinking conservatives have with Guilani.
Did Rudi have a classified clearance with access to high level intelligence related to the Middle East anytime in the last 5 years or so?
Fred did, I’m willing to bet he knows a bit more about our operations than Rudi does. This would make Fred immediately effective while Rudi would require quite a few briefings before he’d even be able to utter the names of the front-line commanders in the field.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.